Application of Fuzzy AHP in Priority Based Selection of Financial Indices: A Perspective for Investors

Ala, A., Simic, V., Pamucar, D., & Jana, C. (2023). A Novel Neutrosophic-Based Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer for Ensuring the Security and Resilience of Sustainable Energy: A Case Study of Belgium. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104709 Search in Google Scholar

Bajec, P., & Tuljak-Suban, D. (2019). A framework for detecting the proper multi-criteria decision-making method taking into account the characteristics of third-party logistics, the requirements of managers, and the type of input data. In Application of Decision Science in Business and Management. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.87222 Search in Google Scholar

Baskaran, V., Madasamy, M., Kumar, S. P., & Sahana, S. V. (2023). Modeling the land suitability for agricultural utility in a semi-arid region of Tirunelveli district, South India using multi-criteria and geospatial approach. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-023-01706-5 Search in Google Scholar

Bobar, Z., Božanić, D., Đurić-Atanasievski, K., Pamučar, D.: (2020). Ranking and Assessment of the Efficiency of Social Media using the Fuzzy AHP-Z Number Model - Fuzzy MABAC, Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 17(3), 43-70. https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.17.3.2020.3.3 Search in Google Scholar

Božanić, D. I., Pamučar, D. S., & Karović, S. M. (2016). Hibridni model fuzzy AHP–MABAC za rangiranje potencijalnih lokacija za izradu maskirnih vezova. Vojnotehnički glasnik/Military Technical Courier, 64(3), 705-729. https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg64-9261 Search in Google Scholar

Božanić, D., Pamučar, D., & Bojanić, D. (2015). Modification of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method using fuzzy logic: Fuzzy AHP approach as a support to the decision making process concerning engagement of the group for additional hindering. Serbian Journal of Management, 10(2), 151-171. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm10-7223 Search in Google Scholar

Bozanic, D., Tešić, D., Komazec, N., Marinković, D., & Puška, A. (2023). Interval fuzzy AHP method in risk assessment. Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 4(1), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.31181/rme040122082023b Search in Google Scholar

Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy sets and systems, 17(3), 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9 Search in Google Scholar

Chang, D. Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European journal of operational research, 95(3), 649-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2 Search in Google Scholar

Chen, H., Huang, A. B., Peng, B., & Liu, Y. M. (2023). Evaluation of Post-Earthquake Geological Environment Carrying Capacity Based on AHP-GIS Coupled Analysis Method. Acadlore TTransactions on Geosciences, 2(1), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.56578/atg020102 Search in Google Scholar

Dabić-Miletić, S., & Raković, K. (2023). Ranking of autonomous alternatives for the realization of intralogistics activities in sustainable warehouse systems using the TOPSIS method. Spectrum of Engineering and Management Sciences, 1(1), 48-57. https://doi.org/10.31181/sems1120234m Search in Google Scholar

Fattoruso, G., Barbati, M., Ishizaka, A. and Squillante, M. (2022). A hybrid AHPSort II and multi-objective portfolio selection method to support quality control in the automotive industry. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2022.2033140 Search in Google Scholar

Fattoruso, G., Scognamiglio, S. and Violi, A. (2022). A New Dynamic and Perspective Parsimonious AHP Model for Improving Industrial Frameworks. Mathematics, 10(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/math10173138 Search in Google Scholar

Gallizo, J. L., Jiménez, F., & Salvador, M. (2002). Adjusting financial ratios: a Bayesian analysis of the Spanish manufacturing sector. Omega, 30(3), 185-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(02)00026-9 Search in Google Scholar

Ghorui, N., Ghosh, A., Mondal, S. P., Kumari, S., Jana, S., & Das, A. (2021). Evaluation of performance for School Teacher Recruitment using MCDM techniques with Interval Data. Multicultural Education, 7(5). http://ijdri.com/me/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/45.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Ghosh, A. (2021). Analyzing Efficiency of Indian Life Insurance Companies using DEA and SEM. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(12), 3897-3919. https://turcomat.org/index.php/turkbilmat/article/view/8178 Search in Google Scholar

Ghosh, A., Jana, S. (2017). Best Indian Information Technology company based on Financial Ratios analysis using VIKOR method. Arthvati-Journal of Economics, 3 (7), 89-100. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=5H7fhGEAAAAJ&citation_for_view=5H7fhGEAAAAJ:Y0pCki6q_DkC Search in Google Scholar

Ghunaim, H., & Dichter, J. (2019). Applying the FAHP to improve the performance evaluation reliability of software defect classifiers. IEEE Access, 7, 62794-62804. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2915964 Search in Google Scholar

Hadžikadunić, A., Stević, Ž., Badi, I., & Roso, V. (2023). Evaluating the Logistics Performance Index of European Union Countries: An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach Utilizing the Bonferroni Operator. International Journal of Knowledge and Innovation Studies, 1(1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.56578/ijkis010104 Search in Google Scholar

Hangshenas, S., Özçelik, Y., Mikaeil, R., & Moghaddam, S. (2017). Ranking and Assesment of tunneling projects risks using fuzzy MCDM (Case Study: Toyserkan Doolayi Tunnel). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316276762_Ranking_and_Assessment_of_Tunneling_Projects_Risks_Using_Fuzzy_MCDM_Case_Study_Toyserkan_Doolayi_Tunnel Search in Google Scholar

Hsieh, H. N., Chen, J. F., & Do, Q. H. (2015). Applying TRIZ and fuzzy AHP based on lean production to develop an innovative design of a new shape for machine tools. Information, 6(1), 89-110. https://doi.org/10.3390/info6010089 Search in Google Scholar

Jana, C. (2021). Multiple attribute group decision-making method based on extended bipolar fuzzy MABAC approach. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 40(6), 227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-021-01606-3 Search in Google Scholar

Jana, C., Dobrodolac, M., Simic, V., Pal, M., Sarkar, B., & Stević, Ž. (2023). Evaluation of sustainable strategies for urban parcel delivery: Linguistic q-rung orthopair fuzzy Choquet integral approach. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106811 Search in Google Scholar

Jana, C., Mohamadghasemi, A., Pal, M., & Martinez, L. (2023). An improvement to the interval type-2 fuzzy VIKOR method. Knowledge-Based Systems, 280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2023.111055 Search in Google Scholar

Jana, C., Simic, V., Pal, M., Sarkar, B., & Pamucar, D. (2024). Hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method with a bipolar fuzzy approach and its applications to economic condition analysis. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107837 Search in Google Scholar

Jana, S., Basu, S (2021). Ranking of Top 20 Pharmaceutical Companies in India using TOPSIS. Empirical Economics Letters, ISSN 1681 8997, Special Issue 3. Search in Google Scholar

Jana, S., Maji, B., Sarkar, A. (2019). Linear Programming Approach for Portfolio Review. Parishodh Journal, 8(XI), 692-702. https://www.academia.edu/84206671/Linear_Programming_Approach_for_Portfolio_Review Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, H., Isaksson, L., & Fiedler, M. (2006, April). SF Wu. A decision system for adequate authentication. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Networking, International Conference on Systems and International Conference on Mobile Communications and Learning Technologies (ICNICONSMCL’06), Washington, DC, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNICONSMCL.2006.9 Search in Google Scholar

Khan, A. A., Mashat, D. S., & Dong, K. (2024). Evaluating Sustainable Urban Development Strategies through Spherical CRITIC-WASPAS Analysis. Journal of Urban Development and Management, 3(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.56578/judm030101 Search in Google Scholar

Krstic, M., Tadic, S., & Agnusdei, L. (2023). Evaluating governance models in intermodal terminal operations: A hybrid grey MCDM approach. Journal of Intelligent Management Decision, 2(4), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.56578/jimd020403 Search in Google Scholar

Kumar, R. D., &Nagarajan, V. (2021). Implementation and performance measure of fuzzy AHP for resource allocation in 5G. Fluctuation and Noise Letters, 20(02), 2150020. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219477521500206 Search in Google Scholar

Kung, J. Y., Chuang, T. N., &Ky, C. M. (2011, June). A fuzzy MCDM method to select the best company based on financial report analysis. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2011) (pp. 2013-2017). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.2011.6007679 Search in Google Scholar

Laitinen, E. K. (2006). Financial statement data in assessing the future potential of a technology firm: The case of Nokia. International Review of Financial Analysis, 15(3), 256-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2005.03.001 Search in Google Scholar

Low, C., & Hsueh Chen, Y. (2012). Criteria for the evaluation of a cloud-based hospital information system outsourcing provider. Journal of medical systems, 36, 3543-3553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-012-9829-z Search in Google Scholar

Modibbo, U. M., Hassan, M., Ahmed, A. and Ali, I. (2022). Multi-criteria decision analysis for pharmaceutical supplier selection problem using fuzzyTOPSIS.” Management Decision 60 (3), 806-836. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2020-1335 Search in Google Scholar

Nandi, S., Granata, G., Jana, S., Ghorui, N., Mondal, S. P., &Bhaumik, M. (2023). Evaluation of the treatment options for COVID-19 patients using generalized hesitant fuzzy-multi criteria decision making techniques. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101614 Search in Google Scholar

Nazzal, D., Mustafa, D., Halabi, E., Gnimat, S., & Gayada, S. (2019). Evaluation of types, stages and treatment of breast cancer among Palestinian women. Palestinian Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal (Pal. Med. Pharm. J.), 5(1), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.59049/2790-0231.1029 Search in Google Scholar

Öcal, M. E., Oral, E. L., Erdis, E., &Vural, G. (2007). Industry financial ratios—application of factor analysis in Turkish construction industry. Building and environment, 42(1), 385-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.07.023 Search in Google Scholar

Onay, A., Karamaşa, Ç., & Saraç, B. (2016). Application of Fuzzy AHP in Selection of Accounting Elective Courses in Undergraduate and Graduate Level. Journal of Accounting Finance and Auditing Studies, 2(4), 20-42. https://www.acadlore.com/article/JAFAS/2016_2_4/jafas020402 Search in Google Scholar

Petrović, N., Živanović, T., & Mihajlović, J. (2023). Evaluating the annual operational efficiency of passenger and freight road transport in Serbia through entropy and TOPSIS methods. Journal of Engoneering Management and Systems Engineering, 2(4), 204-211. https://doi.org/10.56578/jemse020402 Search in Google Scholar

Prajapati, D., Daultani, Y., Cheikhrouhou, N., & Pratap, S. (2020). Identification and ranking of key factors impacting efficiency of Indian shipping logistics sector. Opsearch, 57, 765-786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-020-00442-z Search in Google Scholar

Saaty, T. (1980, November). The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for decision making. In Kobe, Japan, 1, p. 69. http://www.cashflow88.com/decisiones/saaty1.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Seruffo, M., Frances, C., Santana, A., & Vijaykumar, N. (2012). Heuristic algorithm based on multicriteria analysis for selection of first mile access in standard integrated services digital broadcasting terrestrial. IET Communications, 6(17), 2933-2940. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2012.0237 Search in Google Scholar

Sharma, A., Hussain, V. M. S., Kumar, P. A., & Pandit, M. (2023). Prioritization of forging die design criteria based on failure analysis using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). Materials Today: Proceedings, 80, 925-932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.329 Search in Google Scholar

Shekar, P. R., & Mathew, A. (2023). Integrated assessment of groundwater potential zones and artificial recharge sites using GIS and Fuzzy-AHP: a case study in Peddavagu watershed, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11474-5 Search in Google Scholar

Shiue, W., Li, S. T., & Chen, K. J. (2008). A frame knowledge system for managing financial decision knowledge. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 1068-1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.035 Search in Google Scholar

Stevic, Z., N. Mujakovic, A. Goli, and S. Moslem. Selection of logistics distribution channels for final product delivery: FUCOM-MARCOS model. Journal of Intelligent Management Decision 2 (4), 172-178. https://doi.org/10.56578/jimd020402 Search in Google Scholar

Sun, J., & Li, H. (2009). Financial distress prediction based on serial combination of multiple classifiers. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 8659-8666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.002 Search in Google Scholar

Taletović, M. (2023). Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Warehouse: A Brief Review. Spectrum of Engineering and Management Sciences, 1(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.31181/sems11202331t Search in Google Scholar

Van Laarhoven, P. J., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy sets and Systems, 11(1-3), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7 Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Y. J., & Lee, H. S. (2008). A clustering method to identify representative financial ratios. Information Sciences, 178(4), 1087-1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2007.09.016 Search in Google Scholar

Xidonas, P., Mavrotas, G., & Psarras, J. (2009). A multicriteria methodology for equity selection using financial analysis. Computers & operations research, 36(12), 3187-3203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2009.02.009 Search in Google Scholar

Yang, C. C., & Chen, B. S. (2004). Key quality performance evaluation using fuzzy AHP. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 21(6), 543-550. https://doi.org/10.1080/10170660409509433 Search in Google Scholar

Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and control, 8(3), 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X Search in Google Scholar

Zangoueinezhad, A., & Moshabaki, A. (2011). Measuring university performance using a knowledge-based balanced scorecard. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60(8), 824-843. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401111182215 Search in Google Scholar

Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Stević, Ž., & Mardani, A. (2020). Modelling procedure for the selection of steel pipes supplier by applying fuzzy AHP method. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 3(2), 39-53. https://oresta.org/menu-script/index.php/oresta/article/view/53 Search in Google Scholar