This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Akerman, A., Gaarder, I., & Mogstad, M. (2015). The Skill Complementarity of Broadband Internet. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 130(4), 1781-1824. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjv028AkermanA.GaarderI.&MogstadM.2015The Skill Complementarity of Broadband Internet13041781182410.1093/qje/qjv028Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Alaeddin, O., Altounjy, R., Zainudin, Z., & Kamarudin, F. (2018). From physical to digital: investigating consumer behaviour of switching to mobile wallet. Polish Journal of Management Studies 17(2), 18-30.AlaeddinO.AltounjyR.ZainudinZ.&KamarudinF.2018From physical to digital: investigating consumer behaviour of switching to mobile wallet172183010.17512/pjms.2018.17.2.02Search in Google Scholar
Andrews, D., Nicoletti, G., & Timiliotis, C. (2018). Digital technology diffusion: A matter of capabilities, incentives or both? OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1476. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.AndrewsD.NicolettiG.&TimiliotisC.2018Paris, FranceOECD PublishingSearch in Google Scholar
Arens, M. (2019). Policy support for and R&D activities on digitising the European steel industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 143, 244-250.ArensM.2019Policy support for and R&D activities on digitising the European steel industry143244–25010.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.020Search in Google Scholar
Aristei, D., Vecchi, M., & Venturini, F. (2016). University and inter-firm R&D collaborations: propensity and intensity of cooperation in Europe. The Journal of Technology Transfer 41(4), 841-871. doi: 10.1007/ s10961-015-9403-1AristeiD.VecchiM.&VenturiniF.2016University and inter-firm R&D collaborations: propensity and intensity of cooperation in Europe41484187110.1007/s10961-015-9403-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
van Ark O’Mahoney, M., & Timmer, M. (2008). The Productivity Gap between Europe and the United States: Trends and Causes. Journal of Economic Perspectives 22(1), 25-44. doi: 10.1257/jep.22.1.25van Ark O’MahoneyM.&TimmerM.2008The Productivity Gap between Europe and the United States: Trends and Causes221254410.1257/jep.22.1.25Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Balagurova, E. A., Borisov, V. N., Orlova, T. G., Pochukaev, K. G., & Pochukaeva, O. V. (2017). Evaluation of the competitiveness of machinery production as a cumulative effect of the innovative investment saturation dynamics. Scientific works of the Institute of economic forecasting Russian Academy of Sciences 294-315.BalagurovaE. A.BorisovV. N.OrlovaT. G.PochukaevK. G.&PochukaevaO. V.2017Evaluation of the competitiveness of machinery production as a cumulative effect of the innovative investment saturation dynamics294–315Search in Google Scholar
Blind, K., & Mangelsdorf, A. (2013). Alliance Formation of SMEs: Empirical Evidence From Standardization Committees. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 60(1), 148-156. doi: 10.1109/ TEM.2012.2192935BlindK.&MangelsdorfA.2013Alliance Formation of SMEs: Empirical Evidence From Standardization Committees60114815610.1109/TEM.2012.2192935Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bloom, N., Sadun, R., & van Reenen, J. (2012). The Organization of Firms Across Countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 127(4), 1663-1705. doi: 10.1093/qje/qje029BloomN.SadunR.&van ReenenJ.2012The Organization of Firms Across Countries12741663170510.1093/qje/qje029Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
BMWi. (2018). Monitoring-Report Wirtshchaft DIGITAL 2018 Retrieved from https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/DE/Publikationen/Digitale-Welt/monitoring-report-wirtschaft-digital-2018-langfassung.htmlBMWi2018Retrieved fromhttps://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/DE/Publikationen/Digitale-Welt/monitoring-report-wirtschaft-digital-2018-langfassung.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Bresnahan, T. F., Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2002). Information Technology, Workplace Organization, and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm–Level Evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 339-376.BresnahanT. F.BrynjolfssonE.&HittL. M.2002Information Technology, Workplace Organization, and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm–Level Evidence117339–37610.3386/w7136Search in Google Scholar
Bundesregierung. (2018). Forschung und Innovation für die Menschen. Die Hightech-Strategie 2025 Retrieved from https://www.bmbf.de/upload_filestore/pub/Forschung_und_Innovation_fuer_die_Menschen.pdfBundesregierung2018Retrieved fromhttps://www.bmbf.de/upload_filestore/pub/Forschung_und_Innovation_fuer_die_Menschen.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Cenamor, J., Sjödin, D. R., & Parida, V. (2017). Adopting a platform approach in servitization: Leveraging the value of digitalization. International Journal of Production Economics 192, 54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.12.033CenamorJ.SjödinD. R.&ParidaV.2017Adopting a platform approach in servitization: Leveraging the value of digitalization19254–6510.1016/j.ijpe.2016.12.033Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chen, J. L. (2018). The Cases Study of “One Belt and One Road” and “Made in China 2025” Impact on the Development of Taiwan’s Machine Tool Industry. International Business Research 11(2), 189. doi: 10.5539/ ibr.v11n2p189ChenJ. L.2018The Cases Study of “One Belt and One Road” and “Made in China 2025” Impact on the Development of Taiwan’s Machine Tool Industry11218910.5539/ibr.v11n2p189Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coreynen, W., Matthyssens, P., & Van Bockhaven, W. (2017). Boosting servitization through digitization: Pathways and dynamic resource configurations for manufacturers. Industrial Marketing Management 60, p. 42–53. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.04.012CoreynenW.MatthyssensP.&Van BockhavenW.2017Boosting servitization through digitization: Pathways and dynamic resource configurations for manufacturers6042–5310.1016/j.indmarman.2016.04.012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Corrado, C., Haskel, J., & Jona-Lasinio, C. (2014). Knowledge Spillovers, ICT and Productivity Growth Discussion Paper No. 8274. Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp8274.pdfCorradoC.HaskelJ.&Jona-LasinioC.2014Discussion Paper No. 8274. Retrieved fromhttp://ftp.iza.org/dp8274.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Dezhina, I. (2018). Innovation policy in Russia and the development of university–industry linkages. Industry and Higher Education 32(4), 245-252. doi: 10.1177/0950422218774974DezhinaI.2018Innovation policy in Russia and the development of university–industry linkages32424525210.1177/0950422218774974Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dezhina, I. G. (2017). Science and innovation policy of Russian Government: a variety of instruments with uncertain outcome? Public Administration Issues 7-26. doi: 10.17323/1999-5431-2017-0-5-7-26DezhinaI. G.2017Science and innovation policy of Russian Government: a variety of instruments with uncertain outcome?7–2610.17323/1999-5431-2017-0-5-7-26Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dezhina, I., & Etzkowitz, H. (2016). Path dependence and novelties in Russian innovation. Triple Helix 3(11). doi: 10.1186/s40604-016-0042-9DezhinaI.&EtzkowitzH.2016Path dependence and novelties in Russian innovation31110.1186/s40604-016-0042-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dezhina, I., Ponomarev, A., & Frolov, A. (2015). Advanced Manufacturing Technologies in Russia: Outlines of a New Policy. Foresight-Russia 9(1), 20-31. doi: 10.17323/1995-459X.2015.1.20.31DezhinaI.PonomarevA.&FrolovA.2015Advanced Manufacturing Technologies in Russia: Outlines of a New Policy91203110.17323/1995-459X.2015.1.20.31Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dhyne, E., Konings, J., Konings, J., & Vanormelingen, S. (2018). IT and productivity: A firm level analysis. Working Paper Research, No. 346, National Bank of Belgium. Retrieved from https://www.nbb.be/doc/oc/repec/reswpp/wp346en.pdfDhyneE.KoningsJ.KoningsJ.&VanormelingenS.2018Working Paper Research, No. 346, National Bank of Belgium. Retrieved fromhttps://www.nbb.be/doc/oc/repec/reswpp/wp346en.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Digital McKinsey. (2017). Cifrovaya Rossiya: novaya real’nost’ [Digital Russia: a new reality]. Retrieved from http://www.tadviser.ru/images/c/c2/Digital-Russia-report.pdfDigitalMcKinsey.2017Retrieved fromhttp://www.tadviser.ru/images/c/c2/Digital-Russia-report.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Digital Transformation Monitor. (2017). Germany Industrie 4.0 Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/dem/monitor/sites/default/files/DTM_Industrie%204.0.pdfDigitalTransformation Monitor.2017Retrieved fromhttps://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/dem/monitor/sites/default/files/DTM_Industrie%204.0.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Dul, J., & Hak, T. (2008). Case Study Methodology in Business Research Oxford, Great Britain: Butterworth-Heinemann.DulJ.&HakT.2008Oxford, Great BritainButterworth-Heinemann10.4324/9780080552194Search in Google Scholar
Eloranta, V., & Turunen, T. (2016). Platforms in service-driven manufacturing: Leveraging complexity by connecting, sharing, and integrating. Industrial Marketing Management 55, 178-186. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.10.003ElorantaV.&TurunenT.2016Platforms in service-driven manufacturing: Leveraging complexity by connecting, sharing, and integrating55178–18610.1016/j.indmarman.2015.10.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Eloranta, V., Orkoneva, L., Hakanen, E., & Turunen, T. (2016). Using platforms to pursue strategic opportunities in service-driven manufacturing. Service Science 8(3), 344-357. doi: 10.1287/serv.2016.0155ElorantaV.OrkonevaL.HakanenE.&TurunenT.2016Using platforms to pursue strategic opportunities in service-driven manufacturing8334435710.1287/serv.2016.0155Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Esmaeilian, B., Behdad, S., & Wang, B. (2016). The evolution and future of manufacturing: A review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 39, 79-100. doi: 10.13140/ RG.2.1.2720.0402EsmaeilianB.BehdadS.&WangB.2016The evolution and future of manufacturing: A review3979–10010.13140/RG.2.1.2720.0402Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
European Union. (2018). Digital Transformation Scoreboard 2018: EU businesses go digital: Opportunities, outcomes and uptake Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/dem/monitor/sites/default/files/Digital%20Transformation%20Scoreboard%202018_0.pdfEuropeanUnion.2018Retrieved fromhttps://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/dem/monitor/sites/default/files/Digital%20Transformation%20Scoreboard%202018_0.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Fagerberg, J., & Srholec, M. (2016). Explaining regional economic performance: The role of competitiveness, specialization and capabilities. In R. Huggins (Ed.), Handbook of Regions and Competitiveness (pp. 117-135). Northampton, Great Britain: Edward Elgar Publishing.FagerbergJ.&SrholecM.2016Explaining regional economic performance: The role of competitiveness, specialization and capabilitiesHugginsR.117135Northampton, Great BritainEdward Elgar PublishingSearch in Google Scholar
Federal Customs Service. (2018). Tamozhennaya statistika vneshnej torgovli [Customs statistics of the foreign trade]. Retrieved from http://stat.customs.ru/apex/f?p=201:7:507656887394057::NOFederalCustoms Service.2018Retrieved fromhttp://stat.customs.ru/apex/f?p=201:7:507656887394057::NOSearch in Google Scholar
Ferris, S., & Gawande, K. (1998). Coordination Failures and Government Policy: Evidence from Emerging Countries. Carleton Economic Papers 98-03.FerrisS.&GawandeK.1998Coordination Failures and Government Policy: Evidence from Emerging Countries980310.1080/713869427Search in Google Scholar
Fuchs, C. (2018). Industry 4.0: The Digital German Ideology. Triple C: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 16(1), 280-289. doi: 10.31269/triplec.v16i1.1010FuchsC.2018Industry 4.0: The Digital German Ideology. Triple C: Communication, Capitalism & Critique16128028910.31269/triplec.v16i1.1010Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gal, P., Nicoletti, G., Renault, T., Sorbe, S., & Timiliotis, C. (2019). Digitalization and Productivity: In Search of The Holy Grail - Firm-Level Empirical Evidence From European Countries Economics. Department Working Papers No. 1533. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.GalP.NicolettiG.RenaultT.SorbeS.&TimiliotisC.2019Department Working Papers No. 1533Paris, FranceOECD PublishingSearch in Google Scholar
Gauthier, C., Bastianutti, J., & Haggège, M. (2018). Managerial capabilities to address digital business models: The case of digital health. Strategic Change 27(2), 173-180. doi: 10.1002/jsc.2192GauthierC.BastianuttiJ.&HaggègeM.2018Managerial capabilities to address digital business models: The case of digital health27217318010.1002/jsc.2192Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gershman, M., & Thurner, T. (2018). New development: Reinventing industrial policy — a Russian study in engineering and design. Public Money and Management 38(2), 157-160. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2018.1407166GershmanM.&ThurnerT.2018New development: Reinventing industrial policy — a Russian study in engineering and design38215716010.1080/09540962.2018.1407166Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gershman, M., Bredikhin, S. V., & Vishnevskiy, K. (2016) The Role of Corporate Foresight and Technology Roadmapping in Companies’ Innovation Development: the Case of Russian State-Owned Enterprises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 110, 187-195. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.018GershmanM.BredikhinS. V.&VishnevskiyK.2016The Role of Corporate Foresight and Technology Roadmapping in Companies’ Innovation Development: the Case of Russian State-Owned Enterprises110187–19510.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.018Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ghobakhloo, M. (2018). The future of manufacturing industry: a strategic roadmap toward Industry 4.0. Manufacturing Technology Management 29(6), 910-936. doi: 10.1108/JMTM-02-2018-0057GhobakhlooM.2018The future of manufacturing industry: a strategic roadmap toward Industry 4.029691093610.1108/JMTM-02-2018-0057Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gobble, M. M. (2018). Digitalization, Digitization, and Innovation. Research-Technology Management, 61(4), 56-59. doi: 10.1080/08956308.2018.1471280GobbleM. M.2018Digitalization, Digitization, and Innovation614565910.1080/08956308.2018.1471280Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
GOV.UK. (2017). UK Digital Strategy 2017 Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-digital-strategy/uk-digital-strategyGOV.UK2017Retrieved fromhttps://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-digital-strategy/uk-digital-strategySearch in Google Scholar
Gstraunthaler, T., & Proskuryakova, L. (2012). Enabling innovation in extractive industries in commodity-based economies Innovation 14(1), 19-32. doi: 10.5172/impp.2012.14.1.19GstraunthalerT.&ProskuryakovaL.2012Enabling innovation in extractive industries in commodity-based economies141193210.5172/impp.2012.14.1.19Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hasselblatt, M., Huikkola, T., Kohtamäki, M., & Nickell, D. (2018). Modeling manufacturer’s capabilities for the Internet of Things. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 33(6), 822-836. doi: 10.1108/JBIM-11-2015-0225HasselblattM.HuikkolaT.KohtamäkiM.&NickellD.2018Modeling manufacturer’s capabilities for the Internet of Things33682283610.1108/JBIM-11-2015-0225Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hofman, A., Aravena, C., & Aliaga, V. (2016). Information and communication technologies and their impact in the economic growth of Latin America, 1990–2013. Telecommunications Policy 40(5), 485-501. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2016.02.002HofmanA.AravenaC.&AliagaV.2016Information and communication technologies and their impact in the economic growth of Latin America, 1990–201340548550110.1016/j.telpol.2016.02.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hong, J. (2017). Causal relationship between ICT R&D investment and economic growth in Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 116(C), 70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.005HongJ.2017Causal relationship between ICT R&D investment and economic growth in Korea116C707510.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hong, J. P., Byun, J. E., & Kim, P. R. (2016). Structural changes and growth factors of the ICT industry in Korea: 1995-2009. Telecommunications Policy 40(5), 502-513. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2015.08.001HongJ. P.ByunJ. E.&KimP. R.2016Structural changes and growth factors of the ICT industry in Korea: 1995-200940550251310.1016/j.telpol.2015.08.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
ISSEK NRU HSE. (2018a). Delovye tendencii i cifrovaya aktivnost’ predpriyatij obrabatyvayushchej promyshlennosti [Business trends and digital activity of manufacturing enterprises]. Retrieved from https://issek.hse.ru/data/2019/01/14/1146819625/Delovye_tendencii_i_cifrovaya_aktivnost’..abatyvayushchej_promyshlennosti.pdfISSEK NRU HSE2018aRetrieved fromhttps://issek.hse.ru/data/2019/01/14/1146819625/Delovye_tendencii_i_cifrovaya_aktivnost’..abatyvayushchej_promyshlennosti.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
ISSEK NRU HSE. (2018b). Faktory, Ogranichivayushchie Deyatel’nost’organizacij Bazovyh otraslejehkonomiki V 2017 godu [Limiting factors the activities of organizations of the basic sectors of the economy in 2017]. Retrieved from https://issek.hse.ru/data/2018/03/23/1163992811/faktory_ogranichivaushie_deyatelnost_2017.pdfISSEK NRU HSE2018bRetrieved fromhttps://issek.hse.ru/data/2018/03/23/1163992811/faktory_ogranichivaushie_deyatelnost_2017.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
ISSEK NRU HSE. (2018c). Vklad cifrovizacii v rost rossijskoj ehkonomiki [Contribution of digitalization to the growth of the Russian economy]. Retrieved from https://issek.hse.ru/data/2018/07/04/1152915836/NTI_N_91_04072018.pdfISSEK NRU HSE2018cRetrieved fromhttps://issek.hse.ru/data/2018/07/04/1152915836/NTI_N_91_04072018.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
ISSEK NRU HSE. (2019a). Cifrovaya aktivnost’ predpriyatij obrabatyvayushchej promyshlennosti v 2018 godu [Digital enterprise activity manufacturing industry in 2018]. Retrieved from https://issek.hse.ru/data/2019/03/06/1198898189/NTI_N_122_06032019.pdfISSEK NRU HSE2019aRetrieved fromhttps://issek.hse.ru/data/2019/03/06/1198898189/NTI_N_122_06032019.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
ISSEK NRU HSE. (2019b). Indeks cifrovizacii biznesa [The index of the digitalization of business]. Retrieved from https://issek.hse.ru/data/2019/02/27/1193920132/NTI_N_121_27022019.pdfISSEK NRU HSE2019bRetrieved fromhttps://issek.hse.ru/data/2019/02/27/1193920132/NTI_N_121_27022019.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
ITIF. (2017). The Competitive Edge: A Policymaker’s Guide to Developing a National Strategy Retrieved from http://www2.itif.org/2017-competitive-edge.pdf ?_ga=2.185036321.948272023.1542447096-497218199.1542447096ITIF2017Retrieved fromhttp://www2.itif.org/2017-competitive-edge.pdf?_ga=2.185036321.948272023.1542447096-497218199.1542447096Search in Google Scholar
ITIF. (2018). Why Manufacturing Digitalization Matters and How Countries Are Supporting It. Retrieved from http://www2.itif.org/2018-manufacturing-digitalization.pdfITIF2018Retrieved fromhttp://www2.itif.org/2018-manufacturing-digitalization.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Kang, H. S., Lee, J. Y., Choi, S. S., Park, J. H., Son, J. Y., Kim, H., & Noh, S. D. (2016). Smart Manufacturing: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology 3(1), 111-128. doi: 10.1007/s40684-016-0015-5KangH. S.LeeJ. Y.ChoiS. S.ParkJ. H.SonJ. Y.KimH.&NohS. D.2016Smart Manufacturing: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions3111112810.1007/s40684-016-0015-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kim, Y.-Z., & Lee, K. (2008). Sectoral Innovation System and a Technological Catch-up: The Case of the Capital Goods Industry in Korea. Global Economic Review 37(2), 135-155. doi: 10.1080/12265080802021151KimY.-Z.&LeeK.2008Sectoral Innovation System and a Technological Catch-up: The Case of the Capital Goods Industry in Korea37213515510.1080/12265080802021151Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kohnová, L., Papula, J., Salajová, N. (2019). Internal factors supporting business and technological transformation in the context of Industry 4.0. Business: Theory and Practice 20, 137-145. doi: 10.3846/btp.2019.13KohnováL.PapulaJ.SalajováN.2019Internal factors supporting business and technological transformation in the context of Industry 4.020137–14510.3846/btp.2019.13Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Krykavskyy, Y., Pokhylchenko, O., & Hayvanovych, N. (2019). Supply chain development drivers in industry 4.0 in Ukrainian enterprises. Oeconomia Copernicana 10(2), 273-290. doi: 10.24136/oc.2019.014KrykavskyyY.PokhylchenkoO.&HayvanovychN.2019Supply chain development drivers in industry 4.0 in Ukrainian enterprises10227329010.24136/oc.2019.014Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kudryavtseva, T. J., Skhvediani, A. E., & Bondarev, A. A. (2018). Digitalization of banking in Russia: Overview. 2018 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN) IEEE.KudryavtsevaT. J.SkhvedianiA. E.&BondarevA. A.20182018 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN) IEEE10.1109/ICOIN.2018.8343196Search in Google Scholar
Kuzminov, I., Gokhberg, L., Thurner, T., & Khabirova, E. (2018). The Current State of the Russian Agricultural Sector. EuroChoices 17(1), 52-57. doi: 10.1111/1746-692X.12184KuzminovI.GokhbergL.ThurnerT.&KhabirovaE.2018The Current State of the Russian Agricultural Sector171525710.1111/1746-692X.12184Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kuznetsov, B. V., & Simachev, Yu. V. (2015). Evolution of the state industrial policy in Russia. Journal of the New Economic Association 2(22), 152-178.KuznetsovB. V.&SimachevYu. V.2015Evolution of the state industrial policy in Russia222152178Search in Google Scholar
Kwak, K., & Kim, W. (2014). Productivity growth of newly industrializing economies in heterogeneous capital goods markets: the case of the Korean machinery and equipment industry. Journal Applied Economics 47(7), 654-668.KwakK.&KimW.2014Productivity growth of newly industrializing economies in heterogeneous capital goods markets: the case of the Korean machinery and equipment industry47765466810.1080/00036846.2014.978075Search in Google Scholar
Kwak, K., & Kim, W. (2015). Productivity growth of newly industrializing economies in heterogeneous capital goods markets: the case of the Korean machinery and equipment industry. Applied Economics 47(7), 654-668. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2014.978075KwakK.&KimW.2015Productivity growth of newly industrializing economies in heterogeneous capital goods markets: the case of the Korean machinery and equipment industry47765466810.1080/00036846.2014.978075Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kwak, K., & Kim, W., Kim, K. (2018). Latecomer Firms’ Combination of Strategies in a Specialized Suppliers Sector: A Comparative Case Study of the Korean Plastic Injection Molding Machine Industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 133, 190-205. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.004KwakK.&KimW.KimK.2018Latecomer Firms’ Combination of Strategies in a Specialized Suppliers Sector: A Comparative Case Study of the Korean Plastic Injection Molding Machine Industry133190–20510.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lacasa, I. D., Jindrab, B., Radosevic, S., & Shubbak, M. (2019). Paths of technology upgrading in the BRICS economies. Research Policy 48, 262-280. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.016LacasaI. D.JindrabB.RadosevicS.&ShubbakM.2019Paths of technology upgrading in the BRICS economies48262–28010.1016/j.respol.2018.08.016Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lee K., & Malerba, F. (2017). Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership: Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems. Research Policy 46(2), 338-351. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.09.006LeeK.&MalerbaF.2017Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership: Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems46233835110.1016/j.respol.2016.09.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lee, J. J., & Yoon, H. (2015). A comparative study of technological learning and organizational capability development in complex products systems: Distinctive paths of three latecomers in military aircraft industry. Research Policy 44(7), 1296-1313. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.03.007LeeJ. J.&YoonH.2015A comparative study of technological learning and organizational capability development in complex products systems: Distinctive paths of three latecomers in military aircraft industry4471296131310.1016/j.respol.2015.03.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lenka, S., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2017). Digitalization capabilities as enablers of value co-creation in servitizing. Psychology and Marketing 34(1), 92-100. doi: 10.1002/mar.20975LenkaS.ParidaV.&WincentJ.2017Digitalization capabilities as enablers of value co-creation in servitizing3419210010.1002/mar.20975Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lisovskii, A. L., Belovitskii, K. B., & Skomoroshchenko, A. A. (2018). Consequences of digitalization of the Russian Economy for human capital. Quality-Access to Success 19, 15-19.LisovskiiA. L.BelovitskiiK. B.&SkomoroshchenkoA. A.2018Consequences of digitalization of the Russian Economy for human capital1915–19Search in Google Scholar
Martín‐Peña, M. L., Díaz‐Garrido, E., & Sánchez‐López, J. M. (2018). The digitalization and servitization of manufacturing: A review on digital business models. Strategic Change 27(2), 91-99. doi 10.1108/ JBIM-12-2018-0400Martín‐PeñaM. L.Díaz‐GarridoE.&Sánchez‐LópezJ. M.2018The digitalization and servitization of manufacturing: A review on digital business models272919910.1108/JBIM-12-2018-0400Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Min, Y., Lee, S., & Aoshima, Y. (2019). A comparative study on industrial spillover effects among Korea, China, the USA, Germany and Japan. Industrial Management & Data Systems 119(3), 454-472. doi: 10.1108/ IMDS-05-2018-0215MinY.LeeS.&AoshimaY.2019A comparative study on industrial spillover effects among Korea, China, the USA, Germany and Japan119345447210.1108/IMDS-05-2018-0215Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mitra, A., Sharma, C., & Veganzones-Varoudakis, M. A. (2016). Infrastructure, ICT and Firms’ Productivity and Efficiency: An Application to the Indian Manufacturing Singapore: Springer Singapore.MitraA.SharmaC.&Veganzones-VaroudakisM. A.2016SingaporeSpringer Singapore10.1007/978-981-10-0083-6_2Search in Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). The Schumpeterian tradeoff revisited. The American Economic Review, 72(1), 114-132.NelsonR. R.&WinterS. G.1982The Schumpeterian tradeoff revisited721114132Search in Google Scholar
NRU HSE. (2018a). Cifrovaya ehkonomika: global’nye trendy i praktika rossijskogo biznesa [Digital economy: global trends and practice of Russian business]. Retrieved from https://imi.hse.ru/pr2017_1NRU HSE2018aRetrieved fromhttps://imi.hse.ru/pr2017_1Search in Google Scholar
NRU HSE. (2018b). Indikatory innovacionnoj deyatel’nosti: 2018. Statisticheskij sbornik [Indicators of innovation activities; 2018. Statistical compendium]. Retrieved from https://www.hse.ru/data/2018/03/23/1164003717/Indicators_of_Innovation_2018.pdfNRU HSE2018bRetrieved fromhttps://www.hse.ru/data/2018/03/23/1164003717/Indicators_of_Innovation_2018.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
NRU HSE. (2018b). Indikatory innovacionnoj deyatel’nosti: 2018. Statisticheskij sbornik [Indicators of innovation activities; 2018. Statistical compendium]. Retrieved from https://www.hse.ru/data/2018/03/23/1164003717/Indicators_of_Innovation_2018.pdfNRU HSE2018bRetrieved fromhttps://www.hse.ru/data/2018/03/23/1164003717/Indicators_of_Innovation_2018.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
NRU HSE. (2019). Indikatory cifrovoj ekonomiki: 2019: statisticheskij sbornik [Digital Economy Indicators in the Russian Federation: 2019: Data Book]. Retrieved from https://www.hse.ru/data/2019/06/25/1490054019/ice2019.pdfNRU HSE2019Retrieved fromhttps://www.hse.ru/data/2019/06/25/1490054019/ice2019.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
NTI. (2018). Technologies. Description of the Technet Retrieved from http://www.nti2035.ru/technology/technetNTI2018Retrieved fromhttp://www.nti2035.ru/technology/technetSearch in Google Scholar
OECD. (2017). The next Production Revolution — A report for the G20 Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/g20/summits/hamburg/the-next-production-revolution-G20-report.pdfOECD2017Retrieved fromhttps://www.oecd.org/g20/summits/hamburg/the-next-production-revolution-G20-report.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
OECD. (2019). Vectors of Digital Transformation. OECD Digital Economy Papers, 273, 26-27. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5ade2bbaen.pdf?expires=1548433207&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=0B987517F2C54426F43A96F10B784C2BOECD2019OECD Digital Economy Papers, 273, 26-27. Retrieved fromhttps://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5ade2bbaen.pdf?expires=1548433207&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=0B987517F2C54426F43A96F10B784C2BSearch in Google Scholar
OECD/IEA. (2017). Digitalization and Energy. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/DigitalizationandEnergy3.pdfOECD/IEA2017Retrieved fromhttps://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/DigitalizationandEnergy3.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Parida, V., Sjödin, D., & Reim, W (2019). Reviewing Literature on Digitalization, Business Model Innovation, and Sustainable Industry. Past Achievements and Future Promises. Sustainability 11(2), 391. doi: 10.3390/su11020391ParidaV.SjödinD.&ReimW2019Reviewing Literature on Digitalization, Business Model Innovation, and Sustainable Industry11239110.3390/su11020391Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pilat, D. (2004). The ICT Productivity Paradox: Insights from Micro Data. OECD Economic Studies 1, 37-65.PilatD.2004The ICT Productivity Paradox: Insights from Micro Data137–6510.1787/eco_studies-v2004-art3-enSearch in Google Scholar
Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2015). How smart, connected products are transforming companies. Harvard Business Review 93, 96-114.PorterM. E.&HeppelmannJ. E.2015How smart, connected products are transforming companies9396–114Search in Google Scholar
Production management. (2017a). Cifrovoe Proizvodstvo: Segodnya I Zavtra Rossijskoj Promyshlennosti [Special issue of the almanac “Digital production: today and tomorrow of the Russian industry”]. Retrieved from http://up-pro.ru/imgs/specprojects/digital-pro/Digital_production.pdfProduction management2017aRetrieved fromhttp://up-pro.ru/imgs/specprojects/digital-pro/Digital_production.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Production management. (2017b). Cifrovoe Proizvodstvo: Segodnya I Zavtra Rossijskoj Promyshlennosti, 2 “Digital production: today and tomorrow of the Russian industry”, 2]. Retrieved from http://up-pro.ru/imgs/specprojects/digital-pro/Digital_production_3.pdfProduction management2017bRetrieved fromhttp://up-pro.ru/imgs/specprojects/digital-pro/Digital_production_3.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Rabetino, R., Harmsen, W., Kohtamäki, M., & Sihvonen, J. (2018). Structuring servitization-related research. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 38(2), 350-371. doi: 10.1108/ IJOPM-03-2017-0175RabetinoR.HarmsenW.KohtamäkiM.&SihvonenJ.2018Structuring servitization-related research38235037110.1108/IJOPM-03-2017-0175Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rachinger, M., Rauter, R., Müller, C., Vorraber, W., & Schirgi, E. (2018). Digitalization and its influence on business model innovation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. doi: 10.1108/JMTM-01-2018-0020RachingerM.RauterR.MüllerC.VorraberW.&SchirgiE.2018Digitalization and its influence on business model innovation10.1108/JMTM-01-2018-0020Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (1996). Understanding Economic Policy Reform. Journal of Economic Literature 34(1), 9-41.RodrikD.1996Understanding Economic Policy Reform34194110.4324/9780429498893-10Search in Google Scholar
Rowley, J. (1987). Using Case Studies in Research. Management Research News, 25(1). doi: 10.1108/01409170210782990RowleyJ.1987Using Case Studies in Research25110.1108/01409170210782990Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Russian Government. (2019). Nacional’naya programma “Cifrovaya ekonomika Rossijskoj Federacii” [The National Program “Digital economy of the Russian Federation”]. Retrieved from http://static.government.ru/media/files/urKHm0gTPPnzJlaKw3M5cNLo6gc-zMkPF.pdfRussianGovernment.2019Retrieved fromhttp://static.government.ru/media/files/urKHm0gTPPnzJlaKw3M5cNLo6gc-zMkPF.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Simachev, Yu., Kuzyk, М., Кuznetsov, B., & Pogrebnyak, Е. (2014). Russia on the Path Towards a New Technology: Industrial Policy: Exciting Prospects and Fatal Traps. Foresight-Russia 8(4), 6-23.SimachevYu.KuzykМ.КuznetsovB.&PogrebnyakЕ.2014Russia on the Path Towards a New Technology: Industrial Policy: Exciting Prospects and Fatal Traps84623Search in Google Scholar
Ślusarczyk, B., Haseeb, M., & Hussain, H. I. (2019). Fourth industrial revolution: a way forward to attain better performance in the textile industry. Engineering Management in Production and Services 11(2), 52-69. doi: 10.2478/emj-2019-0011ŚlusarczykB.HaseebM.&HussainH. I.2019Fourth industrial revolution: a way forward to attain better performance in the textile industry112526910.2478/emj-2019-0011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sommarberg, M., & Mäkinen, S. (2019). A method for anticipating the disruptive nature of digitalization in the machine-building industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 146, 808-819. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.044SommarbergM.&MäkinenS.2019A method for anticipating the disruptive nature of digitalization in the machine-building industry146808–81910.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.044Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Stiroh, K. J. (2002). Are ICT Spillovers Driving the New Economy? The Review of Income and Wealth 48(1), 33-57. doi: 10.1111/1475-4991.00039StirohK. J.2002Are ICT Spillovers Driving the New Economy?481335710.1111/1475-4991.00039Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Strange, R., & Zucchella, A. (2017). Industry 4.0, global value chains and international business. Multinational Business Review 25(3), 174-184. doi: 10.1108/MBR-05-2017-0028StrangeR.&ZucchellaA.2017Industry 4.0, global value chains and international business25317418410.1108/MBR-05-2017-0028Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Strobel, Th. (2016). ICT intermediates and productivity spillovers—Evidence from German and US manufacturing sectors. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 37(C), 147-163. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2016.04.003StrobelTh.2016ICT intermediates and productivity spillovers—Evidence from German and US manufacturing sectors37C14716310.1016/j.strueco.2016.04.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Szalavetz, A. (2018). Industry 4.0 and capability development in manufacturing subsidiaries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 145, 384-395. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.027SzalavetzA.2018Industry 4.0 and capability development in manufacturing subsidiaries145384–39510.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.027Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Szirmai, A. (2012). Industrialisation as an engine of growth in developing countries, 1950–2005. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 23, 406-420. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2011.01.005SzirmaiA.2012Industrialisation as an engine of growth in developing countries, 1950–200523406–42010.1016/j.strueco.2011.01.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tao, F., & Qi, Q. (2017). Data-driven smart manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 48(part C), 157-169. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.156TaoF.&QiQ.2017Data-driven smart manufacturing48part C15716910.1016/j.procir.2019.03.156Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tether, B. S., & Hipp, C. (2002). Knowledge intensive, technical and other services: patterns of competitiveness and innovation compared. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 14(2), 163-182. doi: 10.1080/09537320220133848TetherB. S.&HippC.2002Knowledge intensive, technical and other services: patterns of competitiveness and innovation compared14216318210.1080/09537320220133848Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
The Government of the Republic of Korea. (2017). People-Centered “Plan for the Fourth Industrial Revolution” to Promote Innovative Growth Retrieved from www.4th-ir2018.co.kr/bbs/download.php%3Fbo_table%3Dreference_en%26wr_id%3D6%26no%3D1+&cd=1&hl=ru&ct=clnk&gl=ruThe Government of the Republic of Korea2017Retrieved fromwww.4th-ir2018.co.kr/bbs/download.php%3Fbo_table%3Dreference_en%26wr_id%3D6%26no%3D1+&cd=1&hl=ru&ct=clnk&gl=ruSearch in Google Scholar
Thurner, T. W., & Zaichenko, S. (2016) Sectoral differences in technology transfer. International Journal of Innovation Management 20(02). doi: 10.1142/ S1363919616500201ThurnerT. W.&ZaichenkoS.2016Sectoral differences in technology transfer200210.1142/S1363919616500201Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Thurner, T., & Proskuryakova, L. N. (2014). Out of the cold–the rising importance of environmental management in the corporate governance of Russian oil and gas producers Business Strategy and the Environment 23(5), 318-332. doi: 10.1002/bse.1787ThurnerT.&ProskuryakovaL. N.2014Out of the cold–the rising importance of environmental management in the corporate governance of Russian oil and gas producers23531833210.1002/bse.1787Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Turovets, J., Vishnevskiy, K., Tokareva, M. S., & Kukushkin, K. (2019). Technology foresight for digital manufacturing: Russian case 2nd International Scientific Conference on Digital Transformation on Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Service, Institute of Physics Publishing (IOP), 012062, 1-6. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/497/1/012062TurovetsJ.VishnevskiyK.TokarevaM. S.&KukushkinK.2019Technology foresight for digital manufacturing: Russian case0120621610.1088/1757-899X/497/1/012062Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Turovets, Yu. V., & Vishnevskiy, K. O. (2019) Standardization in digital manufacturing: implications for Russia and the EAEU. Business Informatics 13(3), 78-96. doi: 10.17323/1998-0663.2019.3.78.96TurovetsYu. V.&VishnevskiyK. O.2019Standardization in digital manufacturing: implications for Russia and the EAEU133789610.17323/1998-0663.2019.3.78.96Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vishnevskiy, K., & Yaroslavtsev, A. B. (2017). Russian S&T Foresight 2030: case of nanotechnologies and new materials. Foresight 19(2), 198-217. doi: 10.1108/FS-08-2016-0041VishnevskiyK.&YaroslavtsevA. B.2017Russian S&T Foresight 2030: case of nanotechnologies and new materials19219821710.1108/FS-08-2016-0041Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vishnevskiy, K., Calof, J. L., & Meissner, D. (2019). Corporate Foresight and Roadmapping for Innovation in Russia: A Joint University Corporate Experience. In D. A. Schreiber, Z. L. Berge (Eds.), Futures Thinking and Organizational Policy: Case Studies for Managing Rapid Change in Technology, Globalization and Workforce Diversity Cham, Swtizerland: Palgrave Macmillan.VishnevskiyK.CalofJ. L.&MeissnerD.2019Corporate Foresight and Roadmapping for Innovation in Russia: A Joint University Corporate ExperienceSchreiberD. A.BergeZ. L.(Eds.)Cham, SwtizerlandPalgrave MacmillanSearch in Google Scholar
Voskoboynikov. I. (2017). Sources of long run economic growth in Russia before and after the global financial crisis. Russian Journal of Economics 3(4), 348-365. doi: 10.1016/j.ruje.2017.12.003VoskoboynikovI.2017Sources of long run economic growth in Russia before and after the global financial crisis3434836510.1016/j.ruje.2017.12.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
De Vries, H., Blind, K., Mangelsdorf, A., Verheul, H., & Van der Zwan, J. (2009) SME access to European standardization. Enabling small and medium-sized enterprises to achieve greater benefit from standards and from involvement in standardization Retrieved from http://www.unms.sk/swift_data/source/dokumenty/technicka_normalizacia/msp/SME-AccessReport.pdfDe VriesH.BlindK.MangelsdorfA.VerheulH.&Van der ZwanJ.2009Retrieved fromhttp://www.unms.sk/swift_data/source/dokumenty/technicka_normalizacia/msp/SME-AccessReport.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Vu, K. (2013). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and Singapore’s Economic Growth. Information Economics and Policy 25(4), 284-300. doi: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2013.08.002VuK.2013Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and Singapore’s Economic Growth25428430010.1016/j.infoecopol.2013.08.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wang, Y. (2017). Industry 4.0: a way from mass customization to mass personalization production. Advances in Manufacturing 4, 311-320. doi: 10.1007/s40436-017-0204-7WangY.2017Industry 4.0: a way from mass customization to mass personalization production4311–32010.1007/s40436-017-0204-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Witkowski, J. Cheba, K., & Kiba-Janiak, M. (2017). The macro-and micro-environmental factors of decisions of production facility location by Japanese companies in Poland. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia 5, 43-56.WitkowskiJ. Cheba, K.&Kiba-JaniakM.2017The macro-and micro-environmental factors of decisions of production facility location by Japanese companies in Poland543–56Search in Google Scholar