[Bastian, O., Haase, D. & Grunevald K. (2012). Ecosystem properties, potentials and services – The EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example. Ecological Indicators, 21, 7−16. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.03.014.10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.03.014]Search in Google Scholar
[Barton, D.N., Stange, E., Blumentrath, S. & Vagnes Traaholt N. (2015). Economic valuation of ecosystem services for policy. A pilot study on green infrastructure in Oslo. NINA Report 1114.]Search in Google Scholar
[Daniel, T.C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J.W., Chan, K.M.A., Costanza, R., Elmquist, T., Flint, C.G., Gobster, P.H., Gret-Regamey, A., Lave, R., Muhar, S., Penker, M., Ribe, R.G., Schauppenlehner, T., Sikor, T., Soloviy, I., Spierenburg, M., Taczanowska, K., Tam, J. & Von der Dunk A. (2012). Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109(23), 8812–8819. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1114773109.10.1073/pnas.1114773109338414222615401]Search in Google Scholar
[De La Barrera, F., Reyes-Paecke, S. & Banzhaf E. (2016). Indicators for green spaces in contrasting urban settings. Ecological Indicators, 62, 212–219. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.027.10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.027]Search in Google Scholar
[Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Müller, F. & Windshorst W. (2009). Landscapes‘ Capacities to Provide Ecosystem Services – A Concept for Land Cover Based Assessments. Landscape Online, 15, 1−22. DOI: 10.3097/LO.200915.10.3097/LO.200915]Search in Google Scholar
[Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S. & Müller F. (2012). Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21, 17–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019.10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019]Search in Google Scholar
[Haase, D., Larondelle, N., Andersson, E., Artmann, M., Borgstrom, S., Breuste, J., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Gren, Å., Hamstead, Z., Hansen, R., Kabisch, N., Kremer, P., Langemeyer, J., Rall, E., Mcphearson, T., Pauleit, S., Qureshi, S., Schwarz, N., Voigt, A. & Elmqvist T. (2014). A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: Concepts, models, and implementation. Ambio, 43(4), 413−433. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0.10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0398952024740614]Search in Google Scholar
[Haines-Young, R. & Potachin M.B. (2018). Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 and guidance on the application of the revised structure. https://cices.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2018/01/Guidance-V51-01012018.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Izakovičová, Z., Mederly, P. & Petrovič F. (2017). Long-term land use changes driven by urbanisation and their environmental effects (Example of Trnava city, Slovakia). Sustainability, 9(9), 1553. DOI: 10.3390/su9091553.10.3390/su9091553]Search in Google Scholar
[Jarabica, V. (2011). Chrenová I v Nitre. Urbanita, 23(1), p. 30−33.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kubišta, R. (2008). Inventarizačné metódy v záhradnej architektúre. Acta Horticulturae et Regiotecturae, 11(Suppl.), 12−15.]Search in Google Scholar
[Machovec, J. (1982). Sadovnická dendrologie. Praha: SPN.]Search in Google Scholar
[Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington: Island Press. https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Murgaš, F. & Klobučník M. (2018). Quality of life in the city, quality of urban life or well-being in the city: conceptualization and case study. Ekológia (Bratislava), 37(2), 183−200. DOI: 10.2478/eko-2018-0016.10.2478/eko-2018-0016]Search in Google Scholar
[Piscová, V., Hrnčiarová, T., Hreško, J., Dobrovodská, M., Izakovičová, Z., Izsoff, M., Kalivoda H., Kanka, R., Kenderessy, P., Považan, R., Roháč, J., Slabejová, M., Slivinský, J., Špulerová, J., Švajda, J., Topercer, J., Vlachovičová, M., Borovský, I. & Hurta V. (2018). Využívanie vysokohorskej krajiny a jeho dôsledky na zmenu prostredia (na príklade Tatier a Nízkych Tatier). Bratislava: Veda, vydavateľstvo SAV.]Search in Google Scholar
[Plieninger, T., Dijks, S., Oteros-Rozas, E. & Bieling C. (2013). Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy, 33, 118–129. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013.10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013]Search in Google Scholar
[Špulerová, J. (2006). Funkcie nelesnej drevinovej vegetácie v krajine. Životné Prostredie, 40(1), 37−40.]Search in Google Scholar
[Turanovičová, M. & Rózová Z. (2017). Metodické východiská hodnotenia kultúrnych ekosystémových služieb v urbanizovanom prostredí. Životné Prostredie, 51(4), 232−239.]Search in Google Scholar
[Turanovičová, M. & Rózová Z. (2018). Vplyv kvality manažmentu na úžitok kultúrnych ekosystémových služieb. Geografické Informácie, 22(2), 315−326. DOI: 10.17846/GI.2018.22.2.315-326.10.17846/GI.2018.22.2.315-326]Search in Google Scholar
[Zulian, G., Stange, E., Woods, H., Carvalho, L., Dick, J., Andrews, Ch., Baró, F., Vizcaino, P., Barton, D.N., Nowel, M., Rusch, G.M., Autunes, P., Fernandes, J., Ferraz, D., Ferreira dos Santos, R., Aszalós, R., Arany, I., Czúcz, B., Priess, J.A., Hoyer, Ch., Bürger-Patricio, G., Lapola, D., Mederly, P., Halabuk, A., Bezák, P., Kopperoinen, L. & Viinikka A. (2018). Practical application of spatial ecosystem service models to aid decision support. Ecosystem Services, 29(Part C), 465−480. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.005.10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.005582168329492376]Search in Google Scholar