[Albrecht, J., Schumacher, J. & Wende W. (2014). The German impact-mitigation regulation – A model for the EU’s no-net-loss strategy and biodiversity offsets? Environmental Policy and Law, 44(3), 317−332.]Search in Google Scholar
[AOPK (2011). Data about area of protected territories.http://www.nature.cz/publik_syst2/files/udaje_o_rozloze_biotopu_cr.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Bastian, O. (1998). Landscape-ecological goals as guiding principles to maintain biodiversity at different planning scales. Ekológia, Bratislava, 17(1), 49−61.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bastian, O. (2013). The role of biodiversity in supporting ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites. Ecological Indicators, 24, 13−22. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.016.10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Bastian, O. & Schreiber K.-F. (Eds.) (1999). Analyse und ökologische Bewertung der Landschaft. Heidelberg, Berlin: Spektrum Akademie Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bastian, O. & Xiao N. (2018). The role of biodiversity in a city. In K. Grunewald, J. Li, G. Xie & L. Kümper-Schlake (Eds.), Towards green cities. Urban biodiversity and ecosystem services in China and Germany (pp. 49−55). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58223-8.10.1007/978-3-319-58223-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Blume, H.-P. & Sukopp H. (1976). Ökologische Bedeutung anthropogener Bodenveränderungen. Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde, 10, 75−89.]Search in Google Scholar
[Botzat, A., Fischer, L.K. & Kowarik I. (2016). Unexploited opportunities in understanding liveable and biodiverse cities. A review on urban biodiversity perception and valuation. Global Environmental Change, 39, 220−233. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.04.008.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.04.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Chevassus-au-Louis, B., Salles, J.-M., Bielsa, S., Richard, D., Martin, G. & Pujol J.-L. (2009). Approche économique de la biodiversité et des services liés aux écosystèmes. Paris: Rapport du CAS.]Search in Google Scholar
[City plan Liberec (2019). City plan of the statutory city of Liberec. https://www.liberec.cz/cz/radnice/strategie-projekty/uzemni-plan/uzemni-planovani/uzemni-plany-obci/liberec/platny-uzemni-plan/]Search in Google Scholar
[COM (2011). Final communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Brussels: European Commission.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cudlín, P., Prokopová, M., Francírková, T., Burešová, R., Smrž, T. & Boucníková E. (2005). System NATURA 2000 utilization for purposes of biotope valuation. Ekológia (Bratislava), 24(Suppl. 1), 52−68.]Search in Google Scholar
[de Groot, R.S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L. & Willemen L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 260−272. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006.10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Diviaková, A., Kočická, E., Belčáková, I. & Beláňová E. (2018). Evaluation of the significance of linear non-forest woody vegetation in the development of an ecological network. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 16(2), 1221−1241. DOI: 10.15666/aeer/1602_12211241.10.15666/aeer/1602_12211241]Search in Google Scholar
[EEC (2007). Guidance document on the strict protection of animal species of Community interest under the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC 2007.http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/guidance/pdf/guidance_en.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Fischer, L.K. & Kowarik I. (2018). Urbane Artenvielfalt ist beliebt! Gesellschaftliche Unterstützung für eine vielfältige Natur im besiedelten Bereich. GIT Labor-Fachzeitschrift, 12, 24−27.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gantioler, S., Rayment, M., Bassi, S., Kettunen, M., McConville, A., Landgrebe, R., Gerdes, H. & ten Brink P. (2010). Costs and socio-economic benefits associated with the Natura 2000 network. Final Report to the European Commission, DG Environment, Institute for European Environmental Policy/GHK/Ecologic, Brussels.]Search in Google Scholar
[Geißler, M. (2017). Bilanzierung der Landschaftspflege im urbanen Raum am Beispiel der Städte Chemnitz, Dresden und Leipzig. Unpubl. Master thesis, Technical University, Dresden.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grunewald, K. & Syrbe R.-U. (2013). Bilanzierung von ausgewählten Leistungen und Anforderungen der Landschaftspflege in Sachsen aus landesweiter Sicht. Dresden: Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grunewald, K., Syrbe, R.-U. & Bastian O. (2014). Landscape management accounting as a tool for indicating the need of action for ecosystem maintenance and restoration – exemplified for Saxony. Ecological Indicators, 37(A), 241−251. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.014.10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.014]Search in Google Scholar
[Grunewald, K. & Bastian O. (2017). Maintaining ecosystem services to support urban needs. Sustainability, 9(1647), 9. DOI:10.3390/su909164710.3390/su9091647]Search in Google Scholar
[Haaren, C.V. & Albert C. (2011). The concepts of ecosystem services and environmental planning: An assessment of the scope for synergies. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 7(3), 150−167. DOI: 10.1080/21513732.2011.616534.10.1080/21513732.2011.616534]Search in Google Scholar
[Haber, W. (1998). Das Konzept der differenzierten Landnutzung – Grundlage für Naturschutz und nachhaltige Naturnutzung. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (Ed.), Ziele des Naturschutzes und einer nachhaltigen Naturnutzung in Deutschland (pp. 57−64). Bonn: BMU.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haines-Young, R. & Potschin M.B. (2018). Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 and Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure. https://cices.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2018/01/Guidance-V51-01012018.pdf10.3897/oneeco.3.e27108]Search in Google Scholar
[Hofmann, M., Westermann, J.R., Kowarik, I. & Van der Meer E. (2012). Perceptions of parks and urban derelict land by landscape planners and residents. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(3), 303−312. DOI: 10.1016/j. ufug.2012.04.001.10.1016/j.ufug.2012.04.001]Search in Google Scholar
[IEEP (ten Brink, P., Monkhouse, C. & Richartz S.) (2002). Promoting the socio-economic benefits of Natura 2000. Background Report, Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), European Conference, Brussels, November 28-29, 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[IÖR (2019). The BIDELIN project.http://bidelin.ioer.eu/en/]Search in Google Scholar
[Kettunen, M., Bassi, S., Gantioler, S. & ten Brink P. (2009). Assessing socio-economic benefits of Natura 2000 – a toolkit for practitioners. Brussels: Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kowarik, I. & Körner S. (2005). Wild urban woodlands. New perspectives for urban forestry. Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/b138211]Search in Google Scholar
[Landschaftsplan Dresden (2018). The landscape plan of the capital city of Dresden.http://www.dresden.de/de/stadtraum/umwelt/umwelt/landschaftsplan/geltender_landschaftsplan.php]Search in Google Scholar
[Laurila-Pant, M., Lehikoinen, A., Uusitalo, L. & Venesjärvi R. (2015). How to valuate biodiversity in environmental management? Ecological Indicators, 55, 1−11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.20153.02.034.10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.02.034]Search in Google Scholar
[MA (2005). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mace, G.M., Norris, K. & Fitter A.H. (2012). Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol. Evol., 27(1), 19−26. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006.10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.00621943703]Search in Google Scholar
[Matzdorf, B., Hansjürgens, B., Lienhoop, N., Schröter, B., Schröter-Schlaack, C., Stöcker, U., Suntken, S. & Szallies I. (2019). Erkenntnisse aus dem TEEB-Deutschland-Prozess für die Politikgestaltung in ländlichen Räumen nutzen. Handlungsempfehlungen am Beispiel dreier Politikfelder. Natur und Landschaft, 94(1), 21−27. DOI: 10.17433/1.2019.50153657.21-27.10.17433/1.2019.50153657.21-27]Search in Google Scholar
[Mertz, O., Ravnborg, H.M., Lövei, G.L., Nielsen, I. & Konijnendijk C.C. (2007). Ecosystem services and biodiversity in developing countries. Biodivers. Conserv., 16(10), 2729−2737. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-007-9216-010.1007/s10531-007-9216-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Moyzeová, M. (2018). Inclusion of the public in the natural capital, ecosystem services and green infrastructure assessments (Results of structured interviews with stakeholders of commune Liptovská Teplička). Ekológia (Bratislava), 37(1), 42–56. DOI: 10.2478/eko-2018-0005.10.2478/eko-2018-0005]Search in Google Scholar
[Müller, N. & Abendroth S. (2007). Empfehlungen für die Nationale Strategie zur Biologischen Vielfalt in Deutschland. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung, 39, 114−118.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pechanec, V., Machar, I., Štěrbová, L., Prokopova, M., Kilianova, H., Chobot, K. & Cudlín P. (2017). Monetary valuation of natural forest habitats in protected areas. Forests, 8, 427. DOI: 10.3390/f8110427.10.3390/f8110427]Search in Google Scholar
[Riedel, W., Lange, H., Jedicke, E. & Reinke M. (Eds.) (2016). Landschaftsplanung. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Spektrum.10.1007/978-3-642-39855-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Ring, I., Hansjürgens, B., Elmqvist, T., Wittmer, H. & Sukhdev P. (2010). Challenges in framing the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: the TEEB initiative. Current Opinion of Environmental Sustainability, 2(1−2), 15−26. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.03.005.10.1016/j.cosust.2010.03.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Ring, I. & Schröter-Schlaack C. (Eds.) (2011). Instrument mixes for biodiversity policies. POLICYMIX Report, No. 2/2011. Leipzig: Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ. http://policymix.nina.no]Search in Google Scholar
[Schlüter, H. (1982). Geobotanische Kennzeichnung und vegetationsökologische Bewertung von Naturraumeinheiten. Archiv für Naturschutz und Landschaftforschung, 22, 69−77.10.1515/9783112519226-002]Search in Google Scholar
[Schutzgebiete Dresden (2018). Schutzgebiete in Dresden.http://www.dresden.de/de/stadtraum/umwelt/umwelt/naturschutz/Schutzgebiete_nach_Naturschutzrecht.php]Search in Google Scholar
[Schweppe-Kraft, B. (2009). Natural capital in Germany – State and valuation; with special reference to biodiversity. In R. Döring (Ed.), Sustainability, natural capital and nature conservation (pp. 193−216). Beiträge zur Theorie und Praxis starker Nachhaltigkeit, Vol. 3. Marburg: Metropolis.]Search in Google Scholar
[Seják, J., Dejmal, I., Petříček, V., Cudlín, P., Míchal, I., Černý, K., Kučera, T., Vyskot, I., Strejček, J., Cudlínová, E., Cabrnoch, J., Šindlar, M., Prokopová, M., Kovář, J., Kupka, M., Sčasný, M., Šafařík, M., Roušarová, Š., Stejskal, V. & Zapletal J. (2003). Monetary valuation of the habitats of the Czech Republic. Prague: Czech Ecological Institute, Ministry of Life Environment of the Czech Republic.]Search in Google Scholar
[Seják, J. & Cudlín P. (2010). On measuring the natural and environmental resource value and damages. Studia Ecologica, 4(2), 53−68.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spangenberg, J.H. & Settele J. (2010). Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services. Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 327−337. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.007.10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.007]Search in Google Scholar
[TEEB (2010). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity. London: Earthscan.]Search in Google Scholar
[TEEB (2011). TEEB manual for cities: Ecosystem services in urban management. London: Earthscan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tüxen, R. (1956). Die heutige potentielle natürliche Vegetation als Gegenstand der Vegetationskartierung. Angewandte Pflanzensoziologie, 13, 5−42.]Search in Google Scholar
[UNEP (1992). The United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity.]Search in Google Scholar
[User’s Manual for CBI (2012): http://www.cbd.int/authorities/doc/User%27s%20Manual-for-the-City-Biodiversity-Index18April2012.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Werner, P. & Zahner R. (2009). Biological diversity and cities. A review and bibliography. BfN-Skripten, 245.]Search in Google Scholar
[Werner, P. (2016). Biologische Vielfalt im urbanen Raum. Zusammenhang, Entwicklung und Einflussfaktoren auf Flora und Fauna. Natur und Landschaft, 91(7), 314−321. DOI: 10.17433/7.2016.50153400.10.17433/7.2016.50153400.314-321]Search in Google Scholar