[Aiba, M., Takafumi, H. & Hiura T. (2012). Interspecific differences in determinants of plant species distribution and the relationships with functional traits. J. Ecol., 100. 950−957. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2012.01959.x.10.1111/j.1365-2745.2012.01959.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Aitchison, J. (1986). The statistical analysis of compositional data. London: Chapman and Hall.10.1007/978-94-009-4109-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Aitchison, J. & Greenacre M. (2002). Biplots of Compositional Data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 51, 375–392. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9876.00275.10.1111/1467-9876.00275]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Andivia, E., Fernández, M., Alejano, R. & Vázquez-Piqué J. (2015). Tree patch distribution drives spatial heterogeneity of soil traits in cork oak woodlands. Ann. For. Sci., 72, 549–559. DOI: 10.1007/s13595-015-0475-8.10.1007/s13595-015-0475-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Angers, D.A. & Caron J. (1998). Plant-induced Changes in Soil Structure: Processes and Feedbacks. Biogeochemistry, 42(1–2), 55–72. DOI: 10.1023/A:1005944025343.10.1023/A:1005944025343]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Baddeley, A. & Turner R. (2005). Spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. Journal of Statistical Software, 12, 1–42. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v012.i06.10.18637/jss.v012.i06]Search in Google Scholar
[Barthes, B. & Roose E. (2002). Aggregate stability as an indicator of soil susceptibility to runoff and erosion; validation at several levels. Catena, 47(2), 133–149. DOI: 10.1016/S0341-8162(01)00180-1.10.1016/S0341-8162(01)00180-1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Binkley, D. & Giardina C. (1998). Why do tree species affect soils? The warp and woof of tree-soil interactions. Biogeochemistry, 42(1–2), 89–106. DOI: 10.1023/A:1005948126251.10.1023/A:1005948126251]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Blanchet, F.G., Legendre, P. & Borcard D. (2008). Forward selection of explanatory variables. Ecology, 89(9), 2623–2632. DOI: 10.1890/07-0986.1.10.1890/07-0986.118831183]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Blank, L. & Carmel Y. (2012). Woody vegetation patch type determines herbaceous species richness and composition in Mediterranean ecosystem. Community Ecol., 13, 72–81. DOI: 10.1556/ComEc.13.2012.1.9.10.1556/ComEc.13.2012.1.9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Boogaart van der, K.G., Tolosana-Delgado, R. & Bren M. (2018). Compositions: Compositional Data Analysis. R package version 1.40-2. https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=compositions]Search in Google Scholar
[Borcard, D. & Legendre P. (2002). All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices. Ecol. Model., 153, 51–68. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00501-4.10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00501-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bratton, S. (1976). Resource division in an understory herb community: responses to temporal and microtopographic gradients. Am. Nat., 110(974), 679–693. www.jstor.org/stable/2459584.10.1086/283097]Search in Google Scholar
[Breshears, D., Rich, P., Barnes, F. & Campbell K. (1997). Overstorey-imposed heterogeneity in solar radiation and soil moisture in a semiarid woodland. Ecol. Appl., 7(4), 1201–1215. DOI: 10.2307/2641208.10.2307/2641208]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Buzuk, G.N. (2017). Phytoindication with ecological scales and regression analysis: environmental index. Bulletin of Pharmacy, 2 (76), 31–37.]Search in Google Scholar
[Canton, Y., Sole-Benet, A., Asensio, C., Chamizo, S. & Puigdefabregas J. (2009). Aggregate stability in range sandy loam soils Relationships with runoff and erosion. Catena, 77, 192–199. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2008.12.011.10.1016/j.catena.2008.12.011]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Chang, L.-W., Zelený, D., Li, C.-F., Chiu, S.-T. & Hsieh C.-F. (2013). Better environmental data may reverse conclusions about niche-and dispersal-based processes in community assembly. Ecology, 94, 2145–2151. DOI: 10.1890/12-2053.1.10.1890/12-2053.124358699]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Chase, J.M. (2014). Spatial scale resolves the niche versus neutral theory debate. J. Veg. Sci., 25, 319–322. DOI: 10.1111/jvs.12159.10.1111/jvs.12159]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Chudomelová, M., Zelený, D. & Li Ch.-F. (2017). Contrasting patterns of fine-scale herb layer species composition in temperate forests. Acta Oecol., 80, 24–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2017.02.003.10.1016/j.actao.2017.02.003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cottenie, K. (2005). Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics. Ecol. Lett., 8, 1175–1182. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00820.x.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00820.x21352441]Search in Google Scholar
[Dallas, T. & Drake J.M. (2014). Relative importance of environmental, geographic, and spatial variables on zooplankton metacommunities. Ecosphere, 5(9), 104. DOI: 10.1890/ES14-00071.1.10.1890/ES14-00071.1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[De la Cruz, M. (2008). Metodos para analizar datos puntuales. In F.T. Maestre, A. Escudero & A. Bonet (Eds.), Introduccion al Analisis Espacial de Datos en Ecologia y Ciencias Ambientales: Metodos y Aplicaciones (pp. 76−127). Madrid: Asociacion Espanola de Ecologia Terrestre, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos y Caja de Ahorros del Mediterraneo.]Search in Google Scholar
[Didukh, Ya.P. (2011). The ecological scales for the species of Ukrainian flora and their use in synphytoindication. Kyiv: Phytosociocentre.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dixon, P.M. (2002). Nearest-neighbor contingency table analysis of spatial segregation for several species. Ecoscience, 9(2), 142–151. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4290147810.1080/11956860.2002.11682700]Search in Google Scholar
[Dray, S., Bauman, D., Blanchet, G., Borcard, D., Clappe, S., Guenard, G., Jombart, T., Larocque, G., Legendre, P., Madi, N. & Wagner H.H. (2018). adespatial: Multivariate multiscale spatial analysis. R package version 0.3-2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=adespatial.]Search in Google Scholar
[Egozcue, J.J., Pawlowsky–Glahn, V., Mateu–Figueras, G. & Barcel’o–Vidal C. (2003). Isometric logratio transformations for compositional data analysis. Mathematical Geology, 35(3), 279–300. DOI: 10.1023/A:1023818214614.10.1023/A:1023818214614]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Elliott, K.J., Vose, J.M., Knoepp, L.D., Clinton, B.D. & Kloeppel B.D. (2015). Functional role of the herbaceous layer in eastern deciduous forest ecosystems. Ecosystems, 18(2), 221–236. DOI: 10.1007/s10021-014-9825-x.10.1007/s10021-014-9825-x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fekete, I., Varga, C., Biró, B., Tóth, J.A., Várbíró, G., Lajtha, K., Szabó, S. & Kotroczó Z. (2016). The effects of litter production and litter depth on soil microclimate in a Central European deciduous forest. Plant Soil, 398 (1–2), 291–300. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-015-2664-5.10.1007/s11104-015-2664-5]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fortin, M.-J. & Dale M. (2005). Spatial analysis: Guide for ecologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Frelich, L.E., Machado, J.L. & Reich P.B. (2003). Fine scale environmental variation and structure of understorey plant communities in two old growth pine forests. J. Ecol., 91, 283–293. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00765.x.10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00765.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gazol, A. & Ibanez R. (2010). Plant species composition in a temperate forest: Multi-scale patterns and determinants. Acta Oecol., 36, 634–644. DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2010.09.009.10.1016/j.actao.2010.09.009]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gilbert, B. & Lechowicz M.J. (2004). Neutrality, niches, and dispersal in a temperate forest understory. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 101(20), 7651–7656. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0400814101.10.1073/pnas.040081410141966115128948]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gilliam, F.S., Turrill, N.L. & Adams M.B. (1995). Herbaceous-layer and overstorey species in clear-cut and mature central Appalachian hardwood forests. Ecol. Appl., 5, 947–955. DOI: 10.2307/2269345.10.2307/2269345]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gilliam, F.S. (2007). The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems. Bioscience, 57, 845–858. DOI: 10.1641/B571007.10.1641/571007]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Griffith, D.A. (1992). What is spatial autocorrelation? Reflections on the past 25 years of spatial statistics. L’Espace Géographique, 21, 265–280.10.3406/spgeo.1992.3091]Search in Google Scholar
[Hurlbert, S.H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr., 54(2), 187–211. DOI: 10.2307/1942661.10.2307/1942661]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jones, C.G., Lawton, J.H. & Shachak M. (1994). Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos, 69, 373–386. DOI: 10.2307/3545850.10.2307/3545850]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jones, M.M., Tuomisto, H., Clark, D.B. & Olivas P. (2006). Effects of mesoscale environmental heterogeneity and dispersal limitation on floristic variation in rainforest ferns. J. Ecol., 94, 181–195. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01071.x.10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01071.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jones, M.M., Tuomisto, H., Borcard, D., Legendre, P., Clark, D.B. & Olivas P.C. (2008). Explaining variation in tropical plant community composition: influence of environmental and spatial data quality. Oecologia, 155, 593–604. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-007-0923-8.10.1007/s00442-007-0923-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Karst, J., Gilbert, B. & Lechowicz M.J. (2005). Fern community assembly: the roles of chance and the environment at local and intermediate scales. Ecology, 86, 2473–2486. DOI: 10.1890/04-1420.10.1890/04-1420]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[King, A.W. & With K.A. (2002). Dispersal success on spatially structured landscapes: when do spatial pattern and dispersal behavior really matter? Ecol. Model., 147(1), 23−39. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00400-8.10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00400-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Laliberte, A.S., Rango, A., Herrick, J.E., Fredrickson, E.L. & Burkett L. (2009). An object–based image analysis approach for determining fractional cover of senescent and green vegetation with digital plot photography. J. Arid Environ., 69, 1–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.08.016.10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.08.016]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Legendre, P. & Fortin M.J. (1989). Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio, 80(2), 107–138. DOI: 10.1007/BF00048036.10.1007/BF00048036]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Legendre, P. (1993). Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology, 74, 1659–1673. DOI: 10.2307/1939924.10.2307/1939924]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Legendre, P. & Gallagher E.D. (2001). Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species. Oecologia, 129(2), 271–280. DOI: 10.1007/s004420100716.10.1007/s00442010071628547606]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Legendre, P., Mi, X., Ren, H., Ma, K., Yu, M., Sun, I.–F. & He F. (2009). Partitioning beta diversity in a subtropical broadleaved forest of China. Ecology, 90, 663–674. DOI: 10.1890/07-1880.1.10.1890/07-1880.119341137]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Legendre, P. & Legendre L. (2012.) Numerical ecology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.]Search in Google Scholar
[Legendre, P. & Gauthier O. (2014). Statistical methods for temporal and space-time analysis of community composition data. Proc. R. Soc. B, 281(1778), 20132728. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2728.10.1098/rspb.2013.2728390693724430848]Search in Google Scholar
[Lennon, J.J. (2000). Red-shifts and red herrings in geographical ecology. Ecography, 23, 101−113. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2000.tb00265.x.10.1111/j.1600-0587.2000.tb00265.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Levin, D.A. & Wilson A.C. (1976). Rates of evolution in seed plants: Net increase in diversity of chromosome numbers and species numbers through time. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 73(6), 2086–2090. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.73.6.2086.10.1073/pnas.73.6.208643045416592327]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lososová, Z., Šmarda, P., Chytrý, M., Purschke, O., Pyšek, P., Sádlo, J., Tichý, L. & Winter M. (2015). Phylogenetic structure of plant species pools reflects habitat age on the geological time scale. J. Veg. Sci., 26, 1080–1089. DOI: 10.1111/jvs.12308.10.1111/jvs.12308]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lyon, J. & Sharpe W.E. (2003). Impacts of hay-scented fern on nutrition of northern red oak seedlings. J. Plant Nutr., 26(3), 487–502. DOI: 10.1081/PLN-120017661.10.1081/PLN-120017661]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[MacKinney, A.L. (1929). Effects of forest litter on soil temperature and soil freezing in autumn and winter. Ecology, 10(3), 312–321. DOI: 10.2307/1929507.10.2307/1929507]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mölder, A., Bernhardt-Römermann, M. & Schmidt W. (2008). Herb-layer diversity in deciduous forests: raised by tree richness or beaten by beech? For. Ecol. Manag., 256(3), 272–281. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.012.10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.012]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Nettesheim, F.C., Garbin, M.L., Rajão, P.H.M., Araujo, D.S.D. & Grelle C.E.V. (2018). Environment is more relevant than spatial structure as a driver of regional variation in tropical tree community richness and composition. Plant Ecology & Diversity, DOI: 10.1080/17550874.2018.1473520.10.1080/17550874.2018.1473520]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Oijen, D., Feijen, M., Hommel, P., Ouden, J. & Waal R. (2005). Effects of tree species composition on within-forest distribution of understorey species. Appl. Veg. Sci., 8(2), 155–166. DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2005.tb00641.x.10.1111/j.1654-109X.2005.tb00641.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F.G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P.R., O’Hara, R.B., Simpson, G.L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M.H.H. & Wagner H. (2018). Community ecology package. R package version 2.5-2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan]Search in Google Scholar
[Paluch, J.G. & Gruba P. (2012). Effect of local species composition on topsoil properties in mixed stands with silver fir (Abies alba Mill.). Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 85(3), 413–426. DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cps040.10.1093//cps040]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Parent, L., de Almeida, C., Hernandes, A., Egozcue, J.J., Gülser, C., Bolinder, M.A., Kätterer, T., Andrén, O., Parent, S.E., Anctil, F., Centurion, J.F. & Natale W. (2012). Compositional analysis for an unbiased measure of soil aggregation. Geoderma, 179–180, 123–131. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.02.022.10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.02.022]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pennisi, B.V. & van Iersel M. (2002). Three ways to measure medium EC. GMPro, 22(1), 46–48.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rao, C.R. (1964). The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A, 26, 329–358. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25049339]Search in Google Scholar
[Siefert, A., Ravenscroft, C., Althoff, D., Alvarez-Y Epiz, J.C., Carter, B.E., Glennon, K.L., Heberling, J.M., Jo, I.S., Pontes, A., Sauer, A., Willis, A. & Fridley J.D. (2012). Scale dependence of vegetation-environment relationships: a meta-analysis of multivariate data. J. Veg. Sci., 23, 942–951. DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01401.x.10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01401.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Silvertown, J., McConway, K., Gowing, D., Dodd, M., Fay, M.F., Joseph, J.A. & Dolphin K. (2006). Absence of phylogenetic signal in the niche structure of meadow plant communities. Proc. R. Soc. B, 273, 39–44. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3288.10.1098/rspb.2005.3288156000416519232]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Smith, T.W. & Lundholm J.T. (2010). Variation partitioning as a tool to distinguish between niche and neutral processes. Ecography, 33, 648–655. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06105.x.10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06105.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Standovár, T., Ódor, P., Aszalós, R. & Gálhidy L. (2006). Sensitivity of ground layer vegetation diversity descriptors in indicating forest naturalness. Community Ecol., 7(2), 199–209. DOI: 10.1556/ComEc.7.2006.2.7.10.1556/ComEc.7.2006.2.7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Stohlgren, T.J., Owen, A.J. & Lee M. (2000). Monitoring shifts in plant diversity in response to climate change: a method for landscapes. Biodivers. Conserv., 9(1), 65–86. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008995726486.10.1023/A:1008995726486]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Teng, S.N., Xu, C., Sandel, B. & Svenning J-C. (2018). Effects of intrinsic sources of spatial autocorrelation on spatial regression modelling. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 363–372. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12866.10.1111/2041-210X.12866]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tobler, W. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46(1), 234–240. DOI: 10.2307/143141.10.2307/143141]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Vadunina, A.F. & Korchagin S.A. (1986). Methods for research of physical properties of the soil. Moscow: Agropromizdat.]Search in Google Scholar
[von Oheimb, G. & Härdtle W. (2009). Selection harvest in temperate deciduous forest: impact on herb layer richness and composition. Biodivers. Conserv., 18(2), 271–287. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-008-9475-4.10.1007/s10531-008-9475-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Weiher, E., Freund, D., Bunton, T., Stefanski, A., Lee, T. & Bentivenga S. (2011). Advances, challenges and a developing synthesis of ecological community assembly theory. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 366, 2403–2413. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0056.10.1098/rstb.2011.0056313042921768155]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Westhoff, V. & van der Maarel E. (1978). The Braun-Blanquet approach. In R.H. Whittaker (Ed.), Classification of plant communities (pp. 289−399). Hague: W. Junk.10.1007/978-94-009-9183-5_9]Search in Google Scholar
[Whigham, D.F. (2004). The ecology of woodland herbs in temperate deciduous forests. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 35, 583–621. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105708.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105708]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Xing, Z., Yan, D., Wang, D., Liu, Sh. & Dong G. (2018). Experimental analysis of the effect of forest litter cover on surface soil water dynamics under continuous rainless condition in North China. Kuwait Journal of Science, 45(2), 75–83.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yoon, T. K., Noh, N. J., Han, S., Lee, J. & Son Y. (2014). Soil moisture effects on leaf litter decomposition and soil carbon dioxide efflux in wetland and upland forests. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 78, 1804–1816. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2014.03.0094.10.2136/sssaj2014.03.0094]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zadorozhnaya, G.A., Andrusevych, K.V. & Zhukov O.V. (2018). Soil heterogeneity after recultivation: ecological aspect. Folia Oecol., 45(1), 46–52. DOI: 10.2478/foecol-2018-0005.10.2478/foecol-2018-0005]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zhukov, A. & Gadorozhnaya G. (2016). Spatial heterogeneity of mechanical impedance of a typical chernozem: the ecological approach. Ekológia (Bratislava), 35, 263–278. DOI: 10.1515/eko-2016-0021.10.1515/eko-2016-0021]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zhukov, A.V. & Zadorozhnaya G.A. (2016). Ecomorphes of the sod-lithogenic soils on reddish-brown clays. Issues of Steppe Forestry and Forest Reclamation of Soils, 45, 91–103.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhukov, O., Kunah, O., Dubinina, Y. & Novikova V. (2018). The role of edaphic and vegetation factors in structuring beta diversity of the soil macrofauna community of the Dnipro river arena terrace. Ekológia (Bratislava), 37(3), 301–327. DOI: 10.2478/eko-2018-0023.10.2478/eko-2018-0023]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zinke, P. (1962). The pattern of influence of individual forest trees on soil properties. Ecology, 43(1), 130–133. DOI: 10.2307/1932049.10.2307/1932049]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar