Ethical considerations in Risk management of autonomous and intelligent systems

AI ACT (2023a): Amendments adopted by the European Parliament on 14 June 2023 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on laying down harmonized rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts. [online] [Retrieved December 18, 2023] Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2023-0236_EN.html Search in Google Scholar

AI ACT (2023b): Artificial Intelligence Act: Council and Parliament strike a deal on the first rules for AI in the world. [online] [Retrieved December 18, 2023] Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2023/12/09/aFrtificial-intelligence-act-council-and-parliament-strike-a-deal-on-the-first-worldwide-rules-for-ai/ Search in Google Scholar

BAQUERO, J. A., BUKHAARDT, R. et al. (2020): Derisking AI by design: How to build risk management into AI development. [online] [Retrieved February 28, 2024] Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/derisking-ai-by-design-how-to-build-risk-management-into-ai-development Search in Google Scholar

CARRIER, R. & NARAYANAN, S. (2022): FH – AI risk management process. In: ForHumanity. [online] [Retrieved December 18, 2023] Available at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tsFWSjQlE5kcyfLqlbTBPnGD8opsYNuSciROMi0yFOM/edit Search in Google Scholar

ELING, M., McSHANE, M. & NGUYEN, T. (2021): Cyber risk management: History and future research directions. In: Risk Manag Insur Rev., 24, pp. 93–125. DOI: 10.1111/rmir.12169. Search in Google Scholar

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (2020): Artificial framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies. [online] [Retrieved December 18, 2023] Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0275_EN.pdf Search in Google Scholar

FACCHINETTI, S., GIUDICI, P. & OSMETTI, S. A. (2020): Cyber risk measurement with ordinal data. In: Stat Methods Appl., 29, pp. 173–185. DOI: 10.1007/s10260-019-00470-0. Search in Google Scholar

FRASER, H. L. & BELLO Y VILLARINO, J. M. (2021): Where residual risks reside: A comparative approach to Art 9(4) of the European Union’s proposed AI regulation. In: SSRN. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3960461. Search in Google Scholar

GIUDICI, P., CENTURELLI, M. & TURCHETTA, S. (2024): Artificial intelligence risk measurement. In: Expert Systems with Applications, 235, 121220. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121220. Search in Google Scholar

GIUDICI, P. & RAFFINETTI, E. (2022): Explainable AI methods in cyber risk management. In: Qual Reliab Eng Int., 38, pp. 1318–1326. DOI: 10.1002/qre.2939. Search in Google Scholar

HAN, S., KELLY, E., NIKOU, S. & SVEE, E. O. (2022): Aligning artificial intelligence with human values: reflections from a phenomenological perspective. In: AI & Soc., 37, pp. 1383–1395. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-021-01247-4. Search in Google Scholar

CHAMBERLAIN, J. (2023): The risk-based approach of the European Union’s proposed artificial intelligence regulation: Some comments from a tort law perspective. In: European Journal of Risk Regulation, 14(1), pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.1017/err.2022.38. Search in Google Scholar

IEEE (2001): Standard for software life cycle processes – risk management. [online] [Retrieved December 18, 2023] Available at: https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/1540/2280/ Search in Google Scholar

IEEE (2021): IEEE standard model process for addressing ethical concerns during system design. In: IEEE Std 7000-2021. DOI: 10.1109/IEEESTD.2021.9536679. Search in Google Scholar

ISO 31000 (2018): ISO 31000 risk management – guidelines. Second edition. [online] [Retrieved December 18, 2023] Available at: https://shahrdevelopment.ir/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/ISO-31000.pdf Search in Google Scholar

KPMG (2021): Artificial Intelligence in Risk Management. [online] [Retrieved February 28, 2024] Available at: https://kpmg.com/ae/en/home/insights/2021/09/artificial-intelligence-in-risk-management.html Search in Google Scholar

KUMAR, R., SHANKAR, S. & NAGLE, F. (2020): The Case for AI Insurance. In: Harvard Business Review Digital Articles. [online] [Retrieved February 28, 2024] Available at: https://hbr.org/2020/04/the-case-for-ai-insurance Search in Google Scholar

MACRAE, C. (2022): Learning from the failure of autonomous and intelligent systems: Accidents, safety, and sociotechnical sources of risk. In: Risk Anal., 42(9), pp. 1999–2025. DOI: 10.1111/risa.13850. Search in Google Scholar

MADIEGA, T. (2023): Artificial intelligence act. In: EU Legislation in Progress. [online] [Retrieved December 18, 2023] Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/698792/EPRS_BRI(2021)698792_EN.pdf Search in Google Scholar

NIST (2023): The artificial intelligence risk management framework. DOI: 10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1. Search in Google Scholar

OECD (2023): Advancing accountability in AI: Governing and managing risks throughout the lifecycle for trustworthy AI. In: OECD Digital Economy Papers, 349. DOI: 10.1787/2448f04ben. Search in Google Scholar

PATÉ-CORNELL, M. E., KUYPERS, M., SMITH, M. & KELLER, P. (2018): Cyber risk management for critical infrastructure: A risk analysis model and three case studies. In: Risk Analysis, 38(2), pp. 226–241. DOI: 10.1111/risa.12844. Search in Google Scholar

POEL, I. (2020): Embedding values in artificial intelligence (AI) systems. In: Minds & Machines, 30, pp. 385–409. DOI: 10.1007/s11023-020-09537-4. Search in Google Scholar

SCHUETT, J. (2023): Risk management in the Artificial Intelligence Act. In: European Journal of Risk Regulation, pp. 1–19. DOI: org/10.1017/err.2023.1. Search in Google Scholar

UNESCO (2022): Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. [online] [Retrieved December 18, 2023] Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137 Search in Google Scholar

ZÄNGERLE, D. & SCHIERECK, D. (2023): Modelling and predicting enterprise-level cyber risks in the context of sparse data availability. In: Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract., 48, pp. 434–462. DOI: 10.1057/s41288-022-00282-6. Search in Google Scholar