[
CINTORA, A. (2011): Brief commentary on Michael Williams’ criticism of Agrippan scepticism. In: Logic and Philosophy of Science, 9(1), pp. 539–554.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CLARKE, S. (2005): Future technologies, dystopic futures and the precautionary principle. In: Ethics and Information Technology, 7(3), pp. 121–126.10.1007/s10676-006-0007-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CODE, L. (2020): Epistemic responsibility. Albany: State University of New York Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DÉMUTH, A. (2009): Poznanie, vedenie alebo interpretácia? [Knowledge, guidance or interpretation?]. Pusté Úľany: Schola Philosophica.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GLUCHMAN, V. (1994): Angažovanosť, solidarita, zodpovednosť [Commitment, solidarity, responsibility]. Prešov: Universum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GLUCHMAN, V. (1996): Etika sociálnych dôsledkov a jej kontexty [Ethics of social consequences and its contexts]. Prešov: PVT
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GLUCHMAN, V. (2008): Etika a reflexie morálky [Ethics and reflection of morality]. Prešov: Filozofická fakulta Prešovskej univerzity
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HORÁK, O. (2021): Táto krajina nie je pre starých. Interview s bioetikom P. Sýkorom. [This country is not for the old. Interview with bioethicist P. Sýkora]. In: DenníkN, April 26, 2021 [online] [Retrieved August 1, 2021] Available at: https://dennikn.sk/2359545/tato-krajina-nieje-pre-starych-minimalizovat-pocet-umrti-na-slovensku-nebol-ciel-vravi-bioetik-sykora-oockovacej-strategii/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JONAS, H. (1984): The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LATOUR, B. & WOOLGAR, S. (1979/1986): Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400820412
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LEVY, N. & SAVULESCU, J. (2020): Epistemic responsibility in the face of a pandemic. In: Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 7(1), [online] [Retrieved May 15, 2021] Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaa03310.1093/jlb/lsaa033
]Search in Google Scholar
[
POPPER, K. R. (2012): The open society and its enemies. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203439913
]Search in Google Scholar
[
POPPER, K. R. (1992): In search of a better world: Lectures and essays from thirty years. London & New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SINGER, P. (1997): How are we to live? Ethics in an age of self-interest. Sydney: Random House.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SMREKOVÁ, D. (2000): K dvom významom pojmu zodpovednosť [Two meanings of the term responsibility]. In: Filozofia, 55(8), pp. 620–631.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SMREKOVÁ, D. & PALOVIČOVÁ, Z. (2009): Dvojznačnosť etických pojmov [Ambiguity of ethical concepts]. Bratislava: Filozofický ústav SAV.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
STANDFORD ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PHILOSOPHY (2021): The epistemic condition for moral responsibility [online] [Retrieved July 25, 2021] Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility-epistemic/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SZAPUOVÁ, M. (2003): Otázky feministickej epistemológie v kontexte súčasných epistemologických iniciatív (naturalizovanej a sociálnej epistemológie) [Issues of feminist epistemology in the context of current epistemological initiatives (naturalized and social epistemology)]. In: Brněnské přednášky [Brno lectures]. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, pp. 267–284.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TALIGA, M. (2019): Kritický racionalizmus a metóda falzifikácie [Critical rationalism and the method of falsification]. Banská Bystrica: Signis.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TUGENDHAT, E. (1993): Vorlesungen über Ethik [Lectures on Ethics]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
VLADYKOVÁ, Ľ. (2015): Úvod do filozofie ekológie [Introduction to the philosophy of ecology]. Košice: Univerzita Pavla Jozefa Šafárika v Košiciach.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WEBER, M. (1965): Politics as a vocation. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
