[
Arstila, Valtteri [2015]. “Theories of apparent motion”. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15: 337–58. DOI: 10.1007/s11097-015-9418-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arstila, Valtteri [2018]. “Temporal experiences without the specious present”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96: 287–302. DOI: 10.1080/00048402.2017.1337211
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bayne, Tim & Montague, Michelle [2011]. “Cognitive phenomenology: An introduction”. In Cognitive Phenomenology, edited by T. Bayne & M. Montague. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1–34.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bourget, David & Mendelovici, Angela [2019]. “Phenomenal intentionality”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/phenomenal-intentionality/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, Richard [2006]. “What is a brain state?” Philosophical Psychology 19: 729–42. DOI: 10.1080/09515080600923271
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chuard, Philippe [2017]. “The snapshot conception of temporal experience”. In I Phillips (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Temporal Experience, edited by I. Phillips. New York: Routledge: 121–32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chuard, Philippe [2011]. “Temporal experiences and their parts”. Philosopher’s Imprint. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3521354.0011.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chuard, Philippe. [2020]. “Temporal consciousness”. In The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Consciousness, edited by U. Kriegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 187–207.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crane, Tim [2013]. “Unconscious belief and conscious thought”. In Phenomenal Intentionality, edited by U. Kriegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 156–73.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dainton, Barry [2023]. “Temporal consciousness”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=consciousness-temporal
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dainton, Barry [2000]. Stream of Consciousness. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dainton, Barry [2017]. “Brentano on the unity of consciousness”. In The Routledge Handbook of Fanz Brentano and the Brentano School, edited by U. Kriegel. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Donnelly, Maureen [2010]. “Endurantist and perdurantist accounts of persistence”. Philosophical Studies 154 27–51. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-010-9526-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ehring, Douglas [2001]. “Temporal parts and bundle theory”. Philosophical Studies 104: 163–8. DOI: 10.1023/a:1010327401920
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fréchette, Guillaume [2017]. “Brentano on time-consciousness”. In The Routledge Handbook of Franz Brentano and the Brentano School, edited by U. Kriegel. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gow, Laura [2016]. “The limitations of Perceptual Transparency”. The Philosophical Quarterly 265: 723–44. DOI: 10.1093/pq/pqw018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harman, Gilbert [1990]. “The intrinsic quality of experience”. In Philosophical Perspectives Vol. 4 Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Company: 31–52. DOI: 10.2307/2214186
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haslanger, Sally [1989]. “Endurance and temporary intrinsics”. Analysis 49: 119–25. DOI: 10.1093/analys/49.3.119
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haslanger, Sally [2003]. “Persistence through time”. In The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics, edited by M. Loux & D. Zimmerman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hawley, Katherine [2001]. How Things Persist. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hawley, Katherine [2020]. “Temporal parts”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=temporal-parts
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hawthorne, John [2006]. “Three-dimensionalism”. In Metaphysical Essays, edited by J. Hawthorne. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hawthorne, John [2008]. “Three-dimensionalism versus Four-dimensionalism”. In Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics, edited by J. Hawthrone, T. Sider, & D. Zimmerman. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heil, John. (2003). From An Ontological Point of View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heil, John. [2021]. Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hirsch, Eli [2008]. “Ontological arguments: Interpretive charity and quantifier variance”. In Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics, edited by J. Hawthorne, T. Sider & D. Zimmerman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoerl, Christoph [2013]. “A succession of feelings, in and of itself, is not a feeling of succession”. Mind 122: 373–417. DOI: 10.1093/mind/fzt070
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoerl, Christoph [2017]. “Temporal experience and the philosophy of perception”. In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Temporal Experience, edited by I. Phillips. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoerl, Christoph [2009]. “Time and tense in perceptual experience”. Philosopher’s Imprint. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/p/phimp/3521354.0009.012/1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hofweber, Thomas & Velleman, J. David [2010]. “How to endure”. The Philosophical Quarterly 61: 37–57. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2010.671.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Horgan, Terence & Tienson, John [2002]. The intentionality of phenomenology and the phenomenology of temporality. In Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings, edited by D. Chalmers. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 520–33.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Husserl, Edmund [1928]. The Phenomenology of Internal Time-Consciousness. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
James, William [1890]. The Principles of Psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kriegel, Uriah [2013]. The Phenomenal Intentionality Research Program. In Phenomenal Intentionality, edited by U. Kriegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1–26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kriegel, Uriah [2007]. “Intentional inexistence and phenomenal intentionality”. Philosophical Perspectives 21: 307–40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2007.00129.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Le Poidevin, Robin [2007]. The Images of Time: An Essay on Temporal Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewis, David [1986]. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Loar, Brian [2003]. “Phenomenal intentionality as the basis of mental content. In Reflections and Replies: Essays on the Philosophy of Tyler Burge, edited by M. Hahn. Mass.: MIT Press: 229–58.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Loar, Brian [1990]. “Phenomenal states”. Philosophical Perspectives 4: 81. DOI: 10.2307/2214188
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McCall, Storrs & Lowe, E. J. [2003]. “3D/4D equivalence, the twins paradox and absolute time”. Analysis 63: 114–23. DOI: 10.1093/analys/63.2.114
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McCall, Storrs & Lowe, E. J. [2006]. “The 3D/4D controversy: A storm in a teacup”. Noûs, 40: 570–78. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2006.00624.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mendelovici, Angela [2018]. The Phenomenal Basis of Intentionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mendola, Joseph [2021]. Experience and Possibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Merricks, Trenton [2001]. Objects and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miller, Kristie [2005]. “The metaphysical equivalence of three and four dimensionalism”. Erkenntnis 62: 91–117. DOI: 10.1007/s10670-004-2845-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nagel, Thomas [1974]. “What is it like to be a bat?”. The Philosophical Review. 83: 435–50. DOI: 10.2307/2183914
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Shaughnessy, Brian [2000]. Consciousness and the World. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Parsons, Josh [2004]. “Distributional properties”. In Lewisian Themes: The Philosophy of David K. Lewis, edited by F. Jackson & G. Priest. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 173–80.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Parsons, Josh [2015]. “A phenomenological argument for stage theory”. Analysis 75: 237–42. DOI: 10.1093/analys/anv022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Parsons, Josh [2000]. “Must a four-dimensionalist believe in temporal parts?”. Monist 83: 399–418. DOI: 10.5840/monist200083319
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paul, L. A [2017]. “The subjectively enduring self”. In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Temporal Experience, edited by I. Phillips. New York: Routledge: 262–72.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Phillips, Ian [2010]. “Perceiving temporal properties”. European Journal of Philosophy 18: 176–202. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0378.2008.00299.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Phillips, Ian [2014]. “The temporal structure of experience”. In Subjective Time, edited by V. Arstila & D. Lloyd. Mass.: MIT Press: 139–58.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prosser, Simon [2017]. “Rethinking the specious present”. In, The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Temporal Experience, edited by I. Philips. New York: Routledge: 146–56.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prosser, Simon [2016]. Experiencing Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roelofs, Luke [2019]. Combining Minds: How to Think About Composite Subjectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roelofs, Luke [2014]. “Phenomenal blending and the palette problem”. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 3: 59–70. DOI: 10.1002/tht3.113
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sattig, Thomas [2015]. The Double Lives of Objects: An Essay in the Metaphysics of the Ordinary World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sattig, Thomas [2002]. “Temporal parts and complex predicates”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 102: 329–36. DOI: 10.1111/j.0066-7372.2003.00057.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sider, Theodore [2001]. Four Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sider, Theodore [2008]. “Temporal parts”. In Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics, Edited by J Hawthorne, T. Sider, & D. Zimmerman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sider, Theodore [1996]. “All the world’s a stage”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74: 433–53. DOI: 10.1080/00048409612347421
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Soteriou, Matthew. [2013]. The Mind’s Construction: The Ontology of Mind and Mental Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Soteriou, Matthew [2007]. “Content and the stream of consciousness”. Philosophical Perspectives 21: 543–68. DOI: 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2007.00135.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steward, Helen [1997]. The Ontology of Mind: Events, Processes, and States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steward, Helen [2013]. “Processes, continuants, and individuals”. Mind, 122: 781–812. DOI: 10.1093/mind/fzt080
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steward, Helen [2015]. “I-what is a continuant?”. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 89, 109–23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8349.2015.00246.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stratman, Christopher [2023]. “Analytic phenomenology and the inseparatism thesis”. Argumenta: 1–26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tye, Michael [1995]. Ten Problems of Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tye, Michael [2000]. Consciousness, Color and Content. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
