[Albert, David Z. 2015. After Physics. Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674735507]Search in Google Scholar
[Bennett, Karen. 2017. Making Things Up. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199682683.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Benovsky, Jiri. 2010. Relational and substantival ontologies, and the nature and the role of primitives in ontological theories. Erkenntnis 73(1): 101–121.10.1007/s10670-010-9213-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Benovsky, Jiri. 2015. From experience to metaphysics: on experience-based intuitions and their role in metaphysics. Noûs 49(4): 684–97.10.1111/nous.12024]Search in Google Scholar
[Benovsky, Jiri. 2016. Eliminativism and gunk. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 35(1): 59–66.]Search in Google Scholar
[Butterfield, Jeremy. 2011. Emergence, reduction and supervenience: a varied landscape. Foundations of Physics 41(6): 920–59.10.1007/s10701-011-9549-0]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Chalmers, David J. 1995. Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2(3): 200–19.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chalmers, David J. Forthcoming. The meta-problem of consciousness, manuscript, https://philpapers.org/archive/CHATMO-32.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Correia, Fabrice; and Schnieder, Benjamin 2012. Grounding: An Opinionated Introduction. In Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality, edited by F. Correia and B. Schnieder. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139149136]Search in Google Scholar
[Crowther, Karen J. 2016. Effective Spacetime: Understanding Emergence in Effective Field Theory and Quantum Gravity. New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-39508-1_7]Search in Google Scholar
[Crowther, Karen J. 2018. Inter-theory relations in quantum gravity: correspondence, reduction, and emergence. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 63: 74–85.10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.12.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Fine, Kit. 2001. The question of realism. Philosophers’ Imprint 1(1): 1–30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heil, John. 2003a. From an Ontological Point of View. Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199259747.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Heil, John. 2003b. Levels of reality. Ratio 16(3): 205–21.10.1111/1467-9329.00218]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Huggett, Nick. 2017. Target space ≠ space. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. doi:10.1016/j. shpsb.2015.08.007.10.1016/j.shpsb.2015.08.007]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Huggett, Nick; and Wüthrich, Christian. 2013. Emergent spacetime and empirical (in)coherence. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44(3): 276–85.10.1016/j.shpsb.2012.11.003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Humphreys, Paul. 2016. Emergence. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199368815.013.38]Search in Google Scholar
[Lam, Vincent; and Wüthrich, Christian. Forthcoming. Spacetime is as spacetime does. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 64: 39–51.10.1016/j.shpsb.2018.04.003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Le Bihan, Baptiste. 2013. Why a gunk world is compatible with nihilism about objects. Studia Philosophica Estonica 6(1): 1–14.10.12697/spe.2013.6.1.01]Search in Google Scholar
[Le Bihan, Baptiste. 2015. The unrealities of time. Dialogue 54(1): 25–44.10.1017/S0012217314000626]Search in Google Scholar
[Le Bihan, Baptiste. 2016. Super-relationism: combining eliminativism about objects and relationism about spacetime. Philosophical Studies 173(8): 2151–72.10.1007/s11098-015-0602-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Le Bihan, Baptiste. 2018. Priority monism beyond spacetime. Metaphysica, 19(1): 95–111.10.1515/mp-2018-0005]Search in Google Scholar
[Le Bihan, Baptiste; and Linnemann, Niels. Forthcoming. Have we lost spacetime on the way? Narrowing the gap between general relativity and quantum gravity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics.]Search in Google Scholar
[Le Bihan, Baptiste; and Read, James. Forthcoming. Duality and ontology. Philosophy Compass.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lewis, Peter J. 2004. Life in configuration Space. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55(4): 713–29.10.1093/bjps/55.4.713]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[McLaughlin, Brian P. 1992. The rise and fall of British emergentism. In Emergence or Reduction? Prospects for Nonreductive Physicalism, edited by A. Beckermann, H. Flohr and J. Kim. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110870084.49]Search in Google Scholar
[McTaggart, John. 1908. The unreality of time. Mind 17(68): 457–74.10.1093/mind/XVII.4.457]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mellor, D. H. 1998. Real Time II. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203302675]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller, Kristie; and James Norton. 2017. Grounding, it’s (probably) all in the head. Philosophical Studies 174(12): 3059–81.10.1007/s11098-016-0846-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Monton, Bradley. 2002. Wave function ontology. Synthese 130(2): 265–77.10.1023/A:1014493527177]Search in Google Scholar
[Monton, Bradley. 2006. Quantum mechanics and 3N dimensional space. Philosophy of Science 73(5): 778–89.10.1086/518633]Search in Google Scholar
[Ney, Alyssa. 2012. The status of our ordinary three dimensions in a quantum universe. Noûs 46(3): 525–60.10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00797.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Ney, Alyssa. 2015. Fundamental physical ontologies and the constraint of empirical coherence: a defense of wave function realism. Synthese 192(10): 3105–24.10.1007/s11229-014-0633-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Oaklander, L. Nathan. 1987. Temporal relations and temporal becoming: a defense of a Russellian theory of time. Noûs 21(1): 75–7.10.2307/2215070]Search in Google Scholar
[Paul, L. A. 2002. Logical parts. Noûs 36(4): 578–96.10.1111/1468-0068.00402]Search in Google Scholar
[Paul, L. A. 2010. Temporal experience. Journal of Philosophy 107(7): 333–59.10.5840/jphil2010107727]Search in Google Scholar
[Paul, L. A. 2012. Building the world from its fundamental constituents. Philosophical Studies 158(2): 221–56.10.1007/s11098-012-9885-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Rovelli, Carlo. 2004. Quantum Gravity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511755804]Search in Google Scholar
[Rovelli, Carlo; and Vidotto, Francesca. 2014. Covariant Loop Quantum Gravity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1007/978-3-642-33036-0_3]Search in Google Scholar
[Schaffer, Jonathan. 2003. Is there a fundamental level? Noûs 37(3): 498–517.10.1111/1468-0068.00448]Search in Google Scholar
[Schaffer, Jonathan. 2010. Monism: the priority of the whole. Philosophical Review 119(1): 31–76.10.1215/00318108-2009-025]Search in Google Scholar
[Sider, Theodore. 1993. Van Inwagen and the possibility of gunk. Analysis 53(4): 285–9.10.1093/analys/53.4.285]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Simons, Peter M. 1987. Parts: A Study in Ontology. Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Van Inwagen, Peter. 1990. Material Beings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wilson, Alastair. 2017. Metaphysical causation. Noûs 50(4): 723–51.10.1111/nous.12190]Search in Google Scholar
[Wüthrich, Christian. 2017. Raiders of the lost spacetime. In Towards a Theory of Spacetime Theories, edited by D. Lehmkuhl, G. Schiemann and E. Scholz. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4939-3210-8_11]Search in Google Scholar
[Yates, David. Forthcoming. Thinking about spacetime. In Philosophy Beyond Spacetime, edited by C. Wüthrich, B. Le Bihan and N. Huggett. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar