[Albers, Anke; Kok, Peter; Toni, Ivan; Dijkerman, Chris; De Lange, Floris. 2013. Shared representations for working memory and mental imagery in early visual cortex. Current Biology 23 (15): 1427–31.10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.065]Search in Google Scholar
[Aleman, André; De Haan, Edward; Kahn, René. 2005. Object versus spatial visual mental imagery in patients with schizophrenia. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience 30 (1): 53–6.]Search in Google Scholar
[Astle, Duncan; Summerfield, Jennifer; Griffin, Ivan; Nobre, Anna. 2012. Orienting attention to locations in mental representations. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 74: 146–62.10.3758/s13414-011-0218-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Baars, Bernard; Franklin, Stan; Ramsoy, Thomas. 2013. Global workspace dynamics: cortical binding and propagation enables conscious contents. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 1–22.10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00200]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Baars, Bernard. 1988. A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baars, Bernard. 2002. The conscious access hypothesis: origins and recent evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6: 47–52.10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01819-2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Baddeley, Alan. 2003. Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4 (10): 829–39.10.1038/nrn1201]Search in Google Scholar
[Barsalou, Lawrence. 2008. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59(6): 17–45.10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639]Search in Google Scholar
[Bartolomeo, Paulo. 2002. The relationship between visual perception and visual mental imagery: a reappraisal of the neuropsychological evidence. Cortex 38 (3): 357–78.10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70665-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bartolomeo, Paulo. 2008. The neural correlates of visual mental imagery: an ongoing debate. Cortex 44 (2): 107–8.10.1016/j.cortex.2006.07.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Berger, Göran; Gaunitz, Samuel. 1979. Self-rated imagery and encoding strategies in visual memory. British Journal of Psychology 70 (1): 21–4.10.1111/j.2044-8295.1979.tb02137.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Block, Ned. 2014. Rich conscious attention outside focal attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18: 445–7.10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.007]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Block, Ned. 1995. On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18: 227–87.10.1017/S0140525X00038188]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Block, Ned. 2007. Consciousness, accessibility and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30: 481–548.10.7551/mitpress/2111.003.0009]Search in Google Scholar
[Block, Ned. 2008. Consciousness and cognitive access. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108: 289–317.10.1111/j.1467-9264.2008.00247.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Block, Ned. 2011. Perceptual consciousness overflows cognitive access. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15: 567–75.10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Borst, Gregoire; Ganis, Georgio; Thompson, William; Kosslyn, Stephen. 2012. Representations in mental imagery and working memory: evidence from different types of visual masks. Memory and Cognition 40(2): 204–17.10.3758/s13421-011-0143-7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Brockmole, James; Wang, Ranxiao Frances; Irwin, David. 2002. Temporal integration between visual images and visual percepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology 28: 315–34.10.1037/0096-1523.28.2.315]Search in Google Scholar
[Brogaard, Berit; Gatzia, Dimitria. 2017. Unconscious imagination and the mental imagery debate. Frontiers in Psychology 8(799): 1–14.10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00799]Search in Google Scholar
[Bronfman, Zohar; Brezis, Noam; Jacobson, Hilla; Usher, Marius. 2014. We see more than we can report: ‘cost free’ color phenomenality. Psychological Science 25(7): 1394–403.10.1177/0956797614532656]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Brown, Richard. 2014. Consciousness doesn’t overflow cognition. Frontiers in Psychology 15(1399): 1–3.10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01399]Search in Google Scholar
[Carruthers, Peter. 2015. Block’s overflow argument. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97(1): 65–70.10.1111/papq.12152]Search in Google Scholar
[Church, Jennifer. 2008. The hidden image: a defense of unconscious imagining and its importance. American Imago 65(3): 379–404.10.1353/aim.0.0024]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cichy, Radoslaw; Heinzle, Jakob; Haynes, John-Dylan. 2012. Imagery and perception share cortical representations of content and location. Cerebral Cortex 22(2): 372–80.10.1093/cercor/bhr106]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cohen, Michael; Dennett, Daniel. 2011. Consciousness cannot be separated from function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15: 358–64.10.1016/j.tics.2011.06.008]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cohen, Michael; Cavanagh, Patrick; Chun, Marvin; Nakayama, Ken. 2012. The attentional requirements of consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16: 411–7.10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.013]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[D’Aloisio-Montilla, Nicholas. 2017. Imagery and overflow. We see more than we report. Philosophical Psychology 30(5): 545–70.10.1080/09515089.2017.1298086]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[D’Aloisio-Montilla, Nicholas. 2018a. A brief argument for consciousness without access. Ratio 31(2): 119–36.10.1111/rati.12183]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[D’Aloisio-Montilla, Nicholas. 2018b. Phillips on unconscious perception and overflow. Philosophia 1–14 (Forthcoming).]Search in Google Scholar
[Dehaene, Stanislas; Kerszberg, Michel; Changeux, Jean-Pierre. 1998. A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95(24): 14529–34.10.1073/pnas.95.24.14529]Search in Google Scholar
[Dehaene, Stanislas; Changeux, Jean-Pierre; Naccache, Lionel; Sackur, Jéröme; Sergent, Claire. 2006. Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10(5): 204–11.10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dehaene, Stanislas. 2014. Consciousness and the Brain: Deciphering How the Brain Codes Our Thoughts. New York: Viking Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dijkstra, Nadine; Bosch, Sander; Van Gerven, Marcel. 2017. Vividness of visual imagery depends on the neural overlap with perception in visual areas. Journal of Neuroscience 37(5): 1367–73.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3022-16.2016]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Farah, Martha; Péronnet, Franck; Gonon, Marie. Electrophysiological evidence for a shared representational medium for visual images and visual percepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117(3): 248–57.10.1037/0096-3445.117.3.248]Search in Google Scholar
[Faw, Bill. 1997. Outlining a brain model of mental imaging abilities. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 21: 283–8.10.1016/S0149-7634(96)00026-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Faw, Bill. 2009. Conflicting intuitions may be based on differing abilities. Journal of Consciousness Studies 16(4): 45–68.]Search in Google Scholar
[Griffin, Ivan; Nobre, Anna. 2003. Orientating attention to locations in internal representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15(8): 1176–94.10.1162/089892903322598139]Search in Google Scholar
[Gross, Stephen; Flombaum, Jonathan. 2017. Does perceptual consciousness overflow cognitive access? The challenge from probabilistic, hierarchical processes. Mind and Language 32: 358–91.10.1111/mila.12144]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ishai, Alumit; Ungerleider, Leslie; Haxby, James. 2000. Distributed neural systems for the generation of visual images. Neuron 28: 979–90.10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00168-911163281]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jacobs, Christianne; Silvanto, Juha. 2015. How is working memory content consciously experienced? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 55: 510–9.10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.06.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Jacobs, Christianne; Schwarzkopf, Dietrich; Silvanto, Juha. 2018. Visual working memory performance in aphantasia. Cortex (105): 61–73.10.1016/j.cortex.2017.10.014]Search in Google Scholar
[Janczyk, Markus; Berryhill, Marian. 2014. Orienting attention in visual working memory requires central capacity: decreased retro-cue effects under dual-task conditions. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 76: 715–24.10.3758/s13414-013-0615-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Kentridge, Robert; Heywood, Charles; Weiskrantz, Lawrence. 2004. Spatial attention speeds discrimination without awareness in blindsight. Neuropsychologia 42: 831–5.1503706110.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.11.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Keogh, Rebecca; Pearson, Joel. 2011. Mental imagery and visual working memory. PLoS One 6: e29221.10.1371/journal.pone.0029221]Search in Google Scholar
[Keogh, Rebecca; Pearson, Joel. 2014. The sensory strength of voluntary visual imagery predicts visual working memory capacity. Journal Of Visualisation 14 (12), 7: 1–13.10.1167/14.12.7]Search in Google Scholar
[Kosslyn, Stephen; Thompson, William. 2003. When is early visual cortex activated during visual mental imagery? Psychological Bulletin 129(5): 723–46.10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.723]Search in Google Scholar
[Kosslyn, Stephen. 2006. The Case for Mental Imagery. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179088.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Kouider, Sid; De Gardelle, Vincent; Sackur, Jérôme; Dupoux, Emmanuel. 2010. How rich is consciousness? The partial awareness hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Science 14: 301–7.10.1016/j.tics.2010.04.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Landman, Rogier; Sepkreijse, Henk; Lamme, Victor. 2003. Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness. Vision Research 43: 149–64.10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00402-912536137]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lau, Hakwan; Rosenthal, David. 2011. Empirical support for higher-order theories of conscious awareness. Trends in Cognitive Science 15(8): 365–73.10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, Sue-Hyun; Baker, Chris. 2016. Multi-voxel decoding and the topography of maintained information during visual working memory. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 10(2): 1–11.10.3389/fnsys.2016.00002]Search in Google Scholar
[Marks, David. 1973. Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology 64: 17–24.10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01322.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Nagel, Thomas. 1974. What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review 83 (4): 435–50.10.2307/2183914]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Nanay, Bence. 2010. Perception and imagination: amodal perception as mental imagery. Philosophical Studies 150(2): 239–54.10.1007/s11098-009-9407-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Nanay, Bence. 2013. Between Perception and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695379.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Nanay, Bence. 2016. Hallucination as mental imagery. Journal of Consciousness Studies 23 (7–8): 65–81.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ng, Annalyn. 2011. Quantity vs. quality: individual differences in capacity and resolution of visual working memory. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/85308/annalyn.pdf%3Bsequence=1 (Accessed September 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Pearson, Joel; Clifford, Colin; Tong, Frank. The functional impact of mental imagery on conscious perception. Current Biology 18(13): 982–6.10.1016/j.cub.2008.05.048]Search in Google Scholar
[Pearson, Joel; Rademaker, Rosanne; Tong, Frank. 2011. Evaluating the mind’s eye: the metacognition of visual imagery. Psychological Science 22(12): 1535–42.10.1177/0956797611417134]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pearson, Joel; Naselaris, Thomas; Holmes, Emily; Kosslyn, Stephen. 2015. Mental imagery: functional mechanisms and clinical applications. Trends in Cognitive Science 19(10): 590–602.10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Pertzov, Yoni; Bays, Paul M.; Joseph, Sabine; Husain, Masud. 2013. Rapid forgetting prevented by retrospective attention cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 39: 1224–31.10.1037/a0030947]Search in Google Scholar
[Phillips, Ian. 2011a. Attention and iconic memory. In Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays, edited by Christopher Mole, Declan Smithies and Wayne Wu. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Phillips, Ian. 2011b. Perception and iconic memory. Mind and Language 26: 381–411.10.1111/j.1468-0017.2011.01422.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Phillips, Ian. 2014. Lack of imagination: individual differences in mental imagery and the significance of consciousness. In New Waves in Philosophy of Mind, edited by Jesper Kallestrup and Mark Sprevak. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137286734_14]Search in Google Scholar
[Phillips, Ian. 2016. No watershed for overflow: recent work on the richness of consciousness. Philosophical Psychology 29(2): 236–49.10.1080/09515089.2015.1079604]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Prinz, Jesse. 2012. The Conscious Brain. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195314595.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosenthal, Clive; Andews, Samantha; Antoniades, Chrystalina; Kennard, Christopher; Soto, David. 2016. Learning and recognition of a nonconscious sequence of events in human primary visual cortex. Current Biology 26: 834–41.10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.040]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Saad, Elyana; Silvanto, Juha. 2013. Contrast and strength of visual memory and imagery differentially affect visual perception. PLoS ONE 8 (12): e84827.10.1371/journal.pone.0084827]Search in Google Scholar
[Salazar, Rodrigo; Dotson, Nicholas; Bressler, Stephen; Gray, Charles. 2012. Content specific fronto-parietal synchronization during visual working memory science. Science 338(6110): 1097–100.10.1126/science.1224000]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwitzgebel, Eric. 2011. Perplexities of Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8243.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Shepard, Roger; Metzler, Jacqueline. 1971. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 171 (3972): 701–3.10.1126/science.171.3972.701]Search in Google Scholar
[Sherwood, Rachel; Pearson, Joel. 2010. Closing the mind’s eye: incoming luminance signals disrupt visual imagery. PLoS ONE 5(12): e15217.10.1371/journal.pone.0015217]Search in Google Scholar
[Sima, Jan; Schultheis, Holber; Barkowsky, Thomas. 2013. Differences between spatial and visual mental representations. Frontiers in Psychology 4(240): 1–15.10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00240]Search in Google Scholar
[Sligte, Ilja; Scholte, Steven; Lamme, Victor. 2008. Are there multiple visual short term memory stores? PLoS ONE 3(2): 1–9.10.1371/journal.pone.0001699]Search in Google Scholar
[Sligte, Ilja; Vandenbroucke, Annelinde; Scholte, Steven. 2010. Detailed sensory memory, sloppy working memory. Frontiers in Psychology 1(175): 1–10.10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00175]Search in Google Scholar
[Soto, David; Mantyla, Teemu; Silvanto, Juha. 2011. Working memory without consciousness. Current Biology 21(22): R912-R913.10.1016/j.cub.2011.09.049]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Soto, David; Silvanto, Juha. 2016. Is conscious awareness needed for all working memory processes? Neuroscience of Consciousness 1: 1–3.10.1093/nc/niw009]Search in Google Scholar
[Sperling, George. 1960. The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 74(11): 1–29.10.1037/h0093759]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Stazicker, James. 2011. Attention, visual consciousness and indeterminacy. Mind and Language 26(2): 156–84.10.1111/j.1468-0017.2011.01414.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Stein, Timo; Kaiser Daniel; Hesselmann, Guido. 2016. Can working memory be non-conscious? Neuroscience of Consciousness 1: 1–3.10.1093/nc/niv011]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomas, Nigel. 2012. Mental imagery. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/mental-imagery/ (accessed September, 2017)]Search in Google Scholar
[Tong, Frank. 2013. Imagery and visual working memory: one and the same? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17(10): 489–90.10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Vandenbroucke, Annelinde; Sligte, Ilja; Lamme, Victor. 2011. Manipulations of attention dissociate fragile visual short term memory from visual working memory. Neuropsychologia 49(6): 1559–68.2123627310.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.044]Search in Google Scholar
[Weger, Ulrich; Abrams, Richard; Law, Mark; Pratt, J. Attending to objects: endogenous cues can produce inhibition of return. Visual Cognition 16(5): 659–74.10.1080/13506280701229247]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zeman, Adam; Dewar, Michaela; Della Sala, Sergio. 2015. Lives without imagery. Congenital aphantasia. Cortex 73: 378–80.10.1016/j.cortex.2015.05.019]Search in Google Scholar
[Zeman, Adam; Della Sala, Sergio; Torrens, Lorna; Gountouna, Viktoria-Eleni; McGonigle, David; Logie, Robert. 2010. Loss of imagery phenomenology with intact visuospatial task performance: a case of ‘blind imagination’. Neuropsychologia 48(1): 145–55.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.024]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar