[Anderson, E. 2010. The Imperative of Integration. Princeton: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bertrand, M., and Mullainathan, S. 2004. Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? American Economic Review, 94, 991–1013.10.1257/0002828042002561]Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Beebee, H. and Saul, J. 2011. Women in Philosophy in the UK: A Report, published by the British Philosophical Association and the Society for Women in Philosophy. (<9-08/Women%20in%20Philosophy%20in%20the%20UK%20 (BPA-SWIPUK%20Report).pdf>)]Search in Google Scholar
[Blair, I. 2002. The Malleability of Automatic Stereotypes and Prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3: 242-261.10.1207/S15327957PSPR0603_8]Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bradley, C. 1984. Sex bias in the evaluation of students. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23: 2, 147-153.10.1111/j.2044-8309.1984.tb00623.x]Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bradley, C. 1993 Sex bias in student assessment overlooked? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 18: 1, 3-8.10.1080/0260293930180101]Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C., & Wittenbrink, B. 2002. The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1314–1329.10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1314]Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C., Wittenbrink, B., Sadler, M. S., & Keesee, T. 2007. Across the thin blue line: Police officers and racial bias in the decision to shoot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1006–1023.10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1006]Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Frances, B. 2005. Scepticism Comes Alive, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199282137.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Goldin, C. and Rouse, C. 2000. Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of ‘Blind’ Auditions on Female Musicians. The American Economic Review, 90:4, 715-741.10.1257/aer.90.4.715]Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Greenwald, A. G., Oakes, M. A. and Hoffman, H. 2003b. Targets of discrimination: Effects of race on responses to weapons holders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 399–405.]Search in Google Scholar
[Holroyd, J. and Sweetman, J. Forthcoming. The Heterogeneity of Implicit Bias. In Implicit Bias and Philosophy, ed. by M. Brownstein and J. Saul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hookway, C. 1990. Scepticism, London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hookway, C. 2000. Truth, Rationality, and Pragmatism: Themes From Peirce. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hookway, C. 2003. How to be a Virtue Epistemologist. In Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology, ed. by M. DePaul and L. Zagzebski. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252732.003.0009]Search in Google Scholar
[Hookway, C. 2010. Some Varieties of Epistemic Injustice: Response to Fricker. Episteme 7:2, 151-163.10.3366/epi.2010.0005]Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Johnson, I. R. 2009. Just say ‘No’ (and mean it): Meaningful negation as a tool to modify automatic racial prejudice. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kang, J. and Banaji, M. 2006. Fair Measures: A Behavioral Realist Revision of ‘Affirmative action’. California Law Review 94: 1063-1118.10.2307/20439059]Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kawakami, K., Dovidio, J. F., Moll, J., Hermsen, S. and Russin, A. 2000. Just say no (to stereotyping): effects of training in the negation of stereotypic associations on stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78 , 871–888.10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.871]Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Legault, L., Gutsell, J., and Inzlicht, M. 2011. Ironic Effects of Antiprejudice Messages: How Motivational Interventions Can Reduce (But also Increase) Prejudice. Psychological Science 22(12) 1472–1477.10.1177/0956797611427918]Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Madva, A. 2013. The Biases Against Debiasing. Paper presented at Implicit Bias, Philosophy and Psychology Conference, Sheffield April 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moskowitz, G. and Li, P. 2011. Egalitarian Goals Trigger Stereotype Inhibition: A Proactive Form of Stereotype Control, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47: 103–16.10.1016/j.jesp.2010.08.014]Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Moss-Racusin, C., Dovidio, J., Brescoll, V., Graham, M., Handelsman, J. 2012. Science Faculty’s Subtle Gender Biases Favor Male Students. PNAS 109 (41) 16395-16396.10.1073/pnas.1211286109]Search in Google Scholar
[Payne, B. K. 2001. Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlling processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181–192.10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.181]Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Peters, Douglas P., and Stephen J. Ceci. 1982. Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:187–255.10.1017/S0140525X00011183]Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Plant, E. A. and Peruche, B. M. 2005. The consequences of race for police officers’ responses to criminal suspects. Psychological Science, 16, 180–183. Price-Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 109 S. Ct. 1775. (1989).10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00800.x15733196]Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rooth, D. 2007. Implicit discrimination in hiring: Real world evidence (IZA Discussion Paper No. 2764). Bonn, Germany: Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (Institute for the Study of Labor).10.2139/ssrn.984432]Search in Google Scholar
[Saul, J. Forthcoming. Implicit Bias, Stereotype Threat and Women in Philosophy. In Women in Philosophy: What Needs to Change?, ed. by F. Jenkins and K. Hutchison. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Formerly titled ‘Unconscious Influences and Women in Philosophy’.)]Search in Google Scholar
[Scheman, N. 2002. Though This be Method, Yet the is Madness in it: Paranoia and Liberal Epistemology. In A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, ed. by L. Antony and C. Witt, Cambridge, MA: Westview.]Search in Google Scholar
[Steinpreis, R., Anders, K., and Ritzke, D. 1999. The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study. Sex Roles, 41: 7/8, 509–528.10.1023/A:1018839203698]Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Siegel, S. 2013. Can Selection Effects on Experience Influence its Rational Role? Oxford Studies in Epistemology Vol. 4: 240-270.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672707.003.0009]Search in Google Scholar
[Stewart, B. D., and Payne, B. K. 2008. Bringing Automatic Stereotyping under Control: Implementation Intentions as Efficient Means of Thought Control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1332-1345.10.1177/014616720832126918660384]Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Unkelbach, C., Forgas, J. and Denson, T. 2008. The Turban Effect: The Influence of Muslim Headgear and Induced Affect on Aggressive Responses in the Shooter Bias Paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44: 5, 1409-1413.10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.003]Abierto DOISearch in Google Scholar
