The Generative Force of the Domain and the Field: Contributions of Highly Creative Women

Academy Museum. (n.d.). Academy museum Óscar timeline. AcademyMuseum.org. Retrieved January 25, 2022, from https://oscars.academymuseum.org/timelines/oscars-firsts Search in Google Scholar

Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, and bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912439000400200210.1177/089124390004002002 Search in Google Scholar

Amabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity in context. Westview Press. Search in Google Scholar

Ayalon, L. (2014). Perceived age, gender, and racial/ethnic discrimination in Europe: Results from the European Social Survey. Educational Gerontology, 40(7), 499–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2013.84549010.1080/03601277.2013.845490 Search in Google Scholar

Baer, J., & Kaufman, J.C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.x Search in Google Scholar

Bonham, K.S., & Stefan, M.I. (2017). Women are underrepresented in computational biology: An analysis of the scholarly literature in biology, computer science and computational biology. PLOS Computational Biology, 13(10), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.100513410.1371/journal.pcbi.1005134 Search in Google Scholar

Caleo, S., & Heilman, M. (2014). Is this a man’s world? Obstacles to women’s success in male-typed domains. In R.J. Burke & D. Major (Eds.), Gender in organizations: Are men allies or adversaries to women’s career advancement? (pp. 217–233). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781955703.0001910.4337/9781781955703.00019 Search in Google Scholar

Cech, E.A., & Blair-Loy, M. (2010). Perceiving glass ceilings? Meritocratic versus structural explanations of gender inequality among women in science and technology. Social Problems, 57(3), 371–397. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2010.57.3.37110.1525/sp.2010.57.3.371 Search in Google Scholar

Cidlinská, K. (2019). How not to scare off women: Different needs of female early-stage researchers in STEM and SSH fields and the implications for support measures. Higher Education, 78, 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0347-x10.1007/s10734-018-0347-x Search in Google Scholar

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2019). Feminist qualitative methods and methodologies in psychology: A review and reflection. Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review, 2(1), 13–28. https://uwe-repository.work-tribe.com/output/85461110.53841/bpspowe.2019.2.1.13 Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, P.N., & Huffman, M.L. (2007). Working for the woman? Female managers and the gender wage gap. American Sociological Review, 72(5), 681–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031224070720050210.1177/000312240707200502 Search in Google Scholar

Crosby, F. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27(3), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027648402700300810.1177/000276484027003008 Search in Google Scholar

Crosby, F. (2017). Sex discrimination, personal denial, and collateral damage. Social Justice Research, 30(1), 89–105. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-017-0279-010.1007/s11211-017-0279-0 Search in Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Collins. Search in Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The systems model of creativity. The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Springer10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7_8 Search in Google Scholar

Dung, S.K., López, A., Barragan, E.L., Reyes, R.J., Thu, R., Castellanos, E., Catalan, F., Huerta-Sánchez, E., & Rohlfs, R.V. (2019). Illuminating women’s hidden contribution to historical theoretical population genetics. Genetics, 211(2), 363–366. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.118.30127710.1534/genetics.118.301277 Search in Google Scholar

Eysenck, H.J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511752247 Search in Google Scholar

Fiorini, R.A. (2018). Transdisciplinary education for deep learning, creativity and innovation. Eruditio, 2(4), 123–146. http://worldacademy.org/eruditio/volume-2/issue-4/article/transdisciplinary-education-deep-learning-creativity-and-innovation Search in Google Scholar

Grönlund, A., & Öun, I. (2018). In search of family-friendly careers? Professional strategies, work conditions and gender differences in work–family conflict. Community, Work & Family, 21(1), 87–105. http://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2017.137546010.1080/13668803.2017.1375460 Search in Google Scholar

Huang, J., Gates, A., Sinatra, R., & Barabasi, A. (2020). Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(9) 4609–4616. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.191422111710.1073/pnas.1914221117 Search in Google Scholar

Isen, A.M., & Reeve, J. (2005). The influence of positive affect on intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Facilitating enjoyment of play responsible work behavior, and self-control. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 295–323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9019-810.1007/s11031-006-9019-8 Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J.C., & Beghetto, R.A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a001368810.1037/a0013688 Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J., Glăveanu, V.P., & Baer, J. (2017). The Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains. Cambridge Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/978131627438510.1017/9781316274385 Search in Google Scholar

Kleven, H., Landais, C., Posch, J., Steinhauer, A., & Zweimüller, J. (2019). Child penalties across countries: Evidence and explanations. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 109, 122–126. http://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.2019107810.1257/pandp.20191078 Search in Google Scholar

Kronborg, L. (2010). What contributes to talent development in eminent women? Gifted and Talented International, 25(2), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2010.1167356710.1080/15332276.2010.11673567 Search in Google Scholar

Kronborg, L. (2021). Eminent women were once gifted girls: How to transform gifted potential into eminent talents. In R.J. Sternberg & D. Ambrose (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (1st ed., pp. 215–233). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56869-6_1310.1007/978-3-030-56869-6_13 Search in Google Scholar

Lerner, M.J. (1981). The justice motive in human relations. In M.J. Lerner & S.C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior: Critical issues in social justice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0429-4_210.1007/978-1-4899-0429-4_2 Search in Google Scholar

Linková, M. (2017). Excellence and its others: Gendered notions of what it takes to succeed in science. In M. Vohlídalová & M. Linková (Eds.), Gender and neoliberalism in Czech academia (pp. 159–197). Slon. Search in Google Scholar

List, K., Hartford, W., & Renzulli, J. (1991). Creative women’s developmental patterns thorough age thirty-five. Gifted Education International, 7(3), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294910070030310.1177/026142949100700303 Search in Google Scholar

Nakano, T.C., Oliveira, K.S., & Zaia, P. (2021). Gender differences in creativity: A systematic literature review. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 37, Article 372116. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e37211610.1590/0102.3772e372116 Search in Google Scholar

Napier, J.L., Suppes, A., & Bettinsoli, M.L. (2020). Denial of gender discrimination is associated with better subjective well-being among women: A system justification account. Eur J Soc Psychol, 50(6), 1191–1209. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.270210.1002/ejsp.2702 Search in Google Scholar

Nobel Prize. (n.d.). Nobel Prize facts. NobelPrize.org. Retrieved January 25, 2022, from https://www.nobel-prize.org/prizes/facts/nobel-prize-facts Search in Google Scholar

Piirto, J. (1991). Why are there so few? Creative women: Visual artists, mathematicians, musicians. Roeper Review, 13(3), 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/0278319910955334010.1080/02783199109553340 Search in Google Scholar

Porto, M.M., & Romo, M.S. (2021). Caracteristicas personales de mujeres altamente creativas: Una revisión sistemática. Revista Ibero-Americana de Criatividade e Inovação, 2(4), 241–255. https://recriai.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/59 Search in Google Scholar

Prado, R.M., Alencar, E.M.L.S., & Fleith, D.S. (2016). Diferenças de gênero em criatividade: Análise das pesquisas brasileiras. Boletim de Psicologia, 66(144), 113–124. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-59432016000100010&lng=pt&tlng=pt Search in Google Scholar

Prado, R.M., & Fleith, D.S. (2020). Mulheres talentosas no Brasil: Trajetórias e desafios profissionais na sociedade contemporânea. Psicologia em Estudo, 25, Article 46906. https://doi.org/10.4025/psicolestud.v25i0.4690610.4025/psicolestud.v25i0.46906 Search in Google Scholar

Real Academia Española. (n.d.). Académicos de número. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación. Retrieved January 25, 2022, from https://www.rae.es/academicos/academicos-de-numero#main Search in Google Scholar

Reis, S.M. (1995). Talent ignored, talent diverted: The cultural context underlying giftedness in females. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(3), 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862950390030610.1177/001698629503900306 Search in Google Scholar

Reis, S.M. (2002). Internal barriers, personal issues, and decisions faced by gifted and talented females. Gifted Child Today, 25(1), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2002-5010.4219/gct-2002-50 Search in Google Scholar

Romo, M. (2018). ¿Tiene género la creatividad? Obstáculos a la excelencia en mujeres. Estudios de Psicología, 35(3), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0275201800030000310.1590/1982-02752018000300003 Search in Google Scholar

Root-Bernstein, R.S., & Root-Bernstein, M.M. (1999). Sparks of genius. Houghton Mifflin. Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M.A., Cramond, B., Pagnani, A.R. (2010). Gender and creativity. In J. Chrisler & D. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 343–357). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1465-1_1710.1007/978-1-4419-1465-1_17 Search in Google Scholar

Simonton, D.K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. The Guilford Press. Search in Google Scholar

Stainback, K., Kleiner, S., & Skaggs, S. (2016). Women in power: Undoing or redoing the gendered organization? Gender & Society, 30(1), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124321560290610.1177/0891243215602906 Search in Google Scholar

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Pesquisa qualitativa: Técnicas e procedimentos para o desenvolvimento de teoria fundamentada. Artmed. Search in Google Scholar

Storage, D., Charlesworth, T.E.S., Banaji, M.R., & Cimpian, A. (2020). Adults and children implicitly associate brilliance with men more than women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 90, Article 104020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.10402010.1016/j.jesp.2020.104020 Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, T.L., & Pfeiffer, S.I. (2020). The identification and development of creativity with particular attention to gender. In H. David (Ed.), Understanding gifted children: Perspectives, gender differences and challenges (pp. 69–96). Nova Science Publishers. Search in Google Scholar

Vohlídalová, M. (2017). Academic couples, parenthood and women’s research careers. European Educational Research Journal, 16(2–3), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/147490411666888310.1177/1474904116668883 Search in Google Scholar

Williams, C.L., Muller, C., & Kilanski, K. (2012). Gendered organizations in the new economy. Gender & Society, 26(4), 549–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124321244546610.1177/0891243212445466 Search in Google Scholar