Creativity in Virtual Teams: A Review and Agenda for Future Research

Abdulla, A.M., Paek, S.H., Cramond, B., & Runco, M.A. (2020). Problem finding and creativity: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 14(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca000019410.1037/aca0000194 Search in Google Scholar

Allison, B.B., Shuffler, M.L., & Wallace, A.M. (2015). The successful facilitation of virtual team meetings. In The Cambridge handbook of meeting science (pp. 680–706). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107589735.029 Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, N., De Dreu, C.K.W., & Nijstad, B.A. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 147–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.23610.1002/job.236 Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920631452712810.1177/0149206314527128 Search in Google Scholar

Andriessen J.H.E. (2003) System match theories. In: J.H. Andriessen (Ed.), Working with Groupware: Understanding and Evaluating Collaborative Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0067-6_510.1007/978-1-4471-0067-6_5 Search in Google Scholar

Arreola, N.J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2016). The effect of problem construction creativity on solution creativity across multiple everyday problems. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(3), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/a004038910.1037/a0040389 Search in Google Scholar

Aritz, J., Walker, R., & Cardon, P. W. (2018). Media use in virtual teams of varying levels of coordination. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 81(2), 222–243. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F232949061772311410.1177/2329490617723114 Search in Google Scholar

Barki, H., & Pinsonneault, A. (2001). Small group brainstorming and idea quality: Is electronic brainstorming the most effective approach? Small Group Research, 32(2), 158–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964010320020310.1177/104649640103200203 Search in Google Scholar

Basadur, M., Runco, M.A., & Vega, L.A. (2000). Understanding how creative thinking skills, attitudes and behaviors work together: A causal process model. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34, 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2000.tb01203.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.2000.tb01203.x Search in Google Scholar

Benedek, M., Nordtvedt, N., Jauk, E., Koschmieder, C., Pretsch, J., Krammer, G., & Neubauer, A.C. (2016). Assessment of creativity evaluation skills: A psychometric investigation prospective teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.00710.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.007 Search in Google Scholar

Blair, C.S., & Mumford, M.D. (2007). Errors in idea evaluation: Preference for the unoriginal? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(3), 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01288.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01288.x Search in Google Scholar

Bos, N., Gergle, D., Olson, J.S., & Olson, G.M. (2001). Being there versus seeing there: Trust via video. In: M. M. Tremaine (Ed.), Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 291–292). https://doi.org/10.1145/634067.63424010.1145/634067.634240 Search in Google Scholar

Bowers, C., Smith, P.A., Cannon-Bowers, J., & Nicholson, D. (2008). Using virtual worlds to assist distributed teams. In: P. Zemliansky & K.S. Amant (Eds.), The Handbook of Research on Virtual Workplaces and the New Nature of Business Practices (pp. 408–423). Idea Group Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-893-210.4018/978-1-59904-893-2 Search in Google Scholar

Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J., & Hertel, G. (2016). Does trust matter more in virtual teams? A meta-analysis of trust and team effectiveness considering virtuality and documentation as moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1151–1177. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl000011310.1037/apl0000113 Search in Google Scholar

Caniëls, M.C., & Rietzschel, E.F. (2015). Organizing creativity: Creativity and innovation under constraints. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(2), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.1212310.1111/caim.12123 Search in Google Scholar

Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In N.J. Castellan, Jr. (Ed.), Individual and group decision making: Current issues (pp. 221–246). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Search in Google Scholar

Carmeli, A., & Spreitzer, G.M. (2009). Trust, connectivity, and thriving: Implications for innovative behaviors at work. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(3), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01313.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01313.x Search in Google Scholar

Cascio, W.F. (2000). Managing a virtual workplace. Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(3), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2000.446806810.5465/ame.2000.4468068 Search in Google Scholar

Chamakiotis, P., Dekoninck, E.A., & Panteli, N. (2013). Factors influencing creativity in virtual design teams: An interplay between technology, teams and individuals. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(3), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.1203910.1111/caim.12039 Search in Google Scholar

Collaros, P.A., & Anderson, L.R. (1969). Effect of perceived expertness upon creativity of members of brainstorming groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53(2, Pt.1), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/h002703410.1037/h0027034 Search in Google Scholar

Cooke, N.J. (2015). Team Cognition as Interaction. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(6), 415–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/096372141560247410.1177/0963721415602474 Search in Google Scholar

Crisp, C.B., & Jarvenpaa, S.L. (2013). Swift trust in global virtual teams: Trusting beliefs and normative actions. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12(1), 45–56. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1027/1866-5888/a00007510.1027/1866-5888/a000075 Search in Google Scholar

Cronin, M.A., & Weingart, L.R. (2007). Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 761–773. https://doi.org/10.2307/2015933310.2307/20159333 Search in Google Scholar

CultureWizard by RW3. (2016). Trends in Global Virtual Teams: Virtual Teams Survey Report. https://www.rw-3.com/2016-trends-in-virtual-teams-report?submissionGuid=06a8ef96-e6e6-4c77-a010-6b5e71b33d24 Search in Google Scholar

Curşeu, P.L., Schalk, R., & Wessel, I. (2008). How do virtual teams process information? A literature review and implications for management. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(6). 628–652. https://doi.org/10.1108/0268394081089472910.1108/02683940810894729 Search in Google Scholar

Daft, R.L., & Lengel, R.H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.55410.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 Search in Google Scholar

De Dreu, C.K.W. (2006). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management, 32(1), 83–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630527779510.1177/0149206305277795 Search in Google Scholar

De Dreu, C.K.W., Nijstad, B.A., Bechtoldt, M.N., & Baas, M. (2011). Group creativity and innovation: A motivated information processing perspective. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/a001798610.1037/a0017986 Search in Google Scholar

De Guinea, A. O., Webster, J., & Staples, D. S. (2012). A meta-analysis of the consequences of virtualness on team functioning. Information & Management, 49(6), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.08.00310.1016/j.im.2012.08.003 Search in Google Scholar

De Jong, B.A., & Elfring, T. (2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 535–549.10.5465/amj.2010.51468649 Search in Google Scholar

De Leede, J., Kraan, K.O., Den Hengst, M., & van Hooff, M.L. (2008). Conditions for innovation behaviour of virtual team members: a’high-road’for internationally dispersed virtual teams. Journal of eWorking, 2(1). Search in Google Scholar

Dennis, A.R., & Kinney, S.T. (1998). Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9(3), 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.3.25610.1287/isre.9.3.256 Search in Google Scholar

Dennis, A.R., & Valacich, J.S. (1993). Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 531–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.53110.1037/0021-9010.78.4.531 Search in Google Scholar

Dennis, A.R., & Williams, M.L. (2003). Electronic brainstorming: Theory, research, and future directions. In P.B. Paulus & B.A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 160–178). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195147308.003.000810.1093/acprof:oso/9780195147308.003.0008 Search in Google Scholar

Dess, G.G., & Picken, J.C. (2000). Changing roles: Leadership in the 21^st century. Organizational dynamics, 28(3), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(00)88447-810.1016/S0090-2616(00)88447-8 Search in Google Scholar

DeRosa, D.M., Hantula, D.A., Kock, N., & D’Arcy, J. (2004). Trust and leadership in virtual teamwork: A media naturalness perspective. Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management, 43(2–3), 219–232.10.1002/hrm.20016 Search in Google Scholar

DeRosa, D.M., Smith, C.L., & Hantula, D.A. (2007). The medium matters: Mining the long-promised merit of group interaction in creative idea generation tasks in a meta-analysis of the electronic group brainstorming literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1549–1581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.07.00310.1016/j.chb.2005.07.003 Search in Google Scholar

Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1991). Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.39210.1037/0022-3514.61.3.392 Search in Google Scholar

Drach-Zahavy, A., & Somech, A. (2001). Understanding team innovation: The role of team processes and structures. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.5.2.11110.1037/1089-2699.5.2.111 Search in Google Scholar

Driskell, J.E., Radtke, P.H., & Salas, E. (2003). Virtual teams: Effects of technological mediation on team performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(4), 297–323. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1089-2699.7.4.29710.1037/1089-2699.7.4.297 Search in Google Scholar

Edmondson, A. (2004). Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: A group-level lens. In R.M. Kramer, & K.S. Cook (Eds.), Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches (pp. 239–272). Russell Sage Foundation. Search in Google Scholar

Fiol, C.M., & O’Connor, E.J. (2005). Identification in face-to-face, hybrid, and pure virtual teams: Untangling the contradictions. Organization Science, 16, 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.010110.1287/orsc.1040.0101 Search in Google Scholar

Fleury, S., Agnes, A., Cados, L., Denis-Lutard, Q., Duchêne, C., Rigaud, N., & Richir, S. (2020). Effects of social influence on idea selection in creativity workshops. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.10069110.1016/j.tsc.2020.100691 Search in Google Scholar

Fosslien, L., & Duffy, M.W. (2020). How to combat zoom fatigue. Harvard Business Review, 29. Search in Google Scholar

Frey, K., Lüthje, C., & Haag, S. (2011). Whom should firms attract to open innovation platforms? The role of knowledge diversity and motivation. Long Range Planning, 44(5–6), 397–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2011.09.00610.1016/j.lrp.2011.09.006 Search in Google Scholar

Gaan, N. (2012). Collaborative tools and virtual team effectiveness: An inductively derived approach in India’s software sector. Decision (0304–0941), 39(1). Search in Google Scholar

Gallupe, R.B., Dennis, A.R., Cooper, W.H., Valacich, J.S., Bastianutti, L.M., & Nunamaker Jr, J.F. (1992). Electronic brainstorming and group size. Academy of Management Journal, 35(2), 350–369. https://doi.org/10.5465/25637710.5465/256377 Search in Google Scholar

Gish, L., & Clausen, C. (2013). The framing of product ideas in the making: a case study of the development of an energy saving pump. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(9), 1085–1101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.83274610.1080/09537325.2013.832746 Search in Google Scholar

Goh, K.T., Goodman, P.S., & Weingart, L.R. (2013). Team innovation processes: An examination of activity cycles in creative project teams. Small Group Research, 44(2), 159–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649641348332610.1177/1046496413483326 Search in Google Scholar

Grawitch, M.J., Munz, D.C., & Kramer, T.J. (2003). Effects of member mood states on creative performance in temporary workgroups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.7.1.4110.1037/1089-2699.7.1.41 Search in Google Scholar

Hambley, L.A., O’Neill, T.A., & Kline, T.J. (2007). Virtual team leadership: The effects of leadership style and communication medium on team interaction styles and outcomes. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 103(1), 1–20.10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.004 Search in Google Scholar

Han, H.J., Hiltz, S.R., Fjermestad, J., & Wang, Y.Q. (2011). Does medium matter? A comparison of initial meeting modes for virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 54, 376–391. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2011.217575910.1109/TPC.2011.2175759 Search in Google Scholar

Harvey, S. (2014). Creative synthesis: Exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 324–343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.022410.5465/amr.2012.0224 Search in Google Scholar

Harvey, S., & Kou, C.Y. (2013). Collective engagement in creative tasks: The role of evaluation in the creative process in groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58, 346–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/000183921349859110.1177/0001839213498591 Search in Google Scholar

Haught-Tromp, C. (2016). Creativity and constraint: Friends, not foes. In J.C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Current perspectives in social and behavioral sciences. Creativity and reason in cognitive development (p. 211–225). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139941969.01110.1017/CBO9781139941969.011 Search in Google Scholar

Hennessey, B.A., & Amabile, T.M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569-598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.10041610.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416 Search in Google Scholar

Hoegl, M., Weinkauf, K., & Gemuenden, H.G. (2004). Interteam Coordination, Project Commitment, and Teamwork in Multiteam R&D Projects: A Longitudinal Study. Organization Science, 15(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1030.005310.1287/orsc.1030.0053 Search in Google Scholar

Hogg, M.A., & Reid, S.A. (2006). Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00003.x10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00003.x Search in Google Scholar

Hollingshead, A.B., McGrath, J.E., & O’Connor, K.M. (1993). Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups. Small Group Research, 24(3), 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F104649649324300310.1177/1046496493243003 Search in Google Scholar

Hülsheger, U.R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J.F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128–1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a001597810.1037/a0015978 Search in Google Scholar

Ishii, K., Lyons, M.M., & Carr, S.A. (2019). Revisiting media richness theory for today and future. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.13810.1002/hbe2.138 Search in Google Scholar

Jarvenpaa, S.L., & Keating, E. (2021). When do good communication models fail in global virtual teams? Organizational Dynamics, 50(1), No. 100843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2021.10084310.1016/j.orgdyn.2021.100843 Search in Google Scholar

Jarvenpaa, S.L., & Leidner, D.E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10(6), 791–815. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.6.79110.1287/orsc.10.6.791 Search in Google Scholar

Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2007). The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS quarterly, 783–808. https://doi.org/10.2307/2514882010.2307/25148820 Search in Google Scholar

Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2002). Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00019-710.1016/S0963-8687(02)00019-7 Search in Google Scholar

Kirkman, B.L., & Mathieu, J.E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31(5), 700–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630527911310.1177/0149206305279113 Search in Google Scholar

Kozlowski, S.W., & Bell, B.S. (2008). Team learning, development, and adaptation. In: V.I. Sessa & M.L. London (Eds.), Work Group Learning: Understanding, Improving & Assessing how Groups Learn in Organizations (pp. 15–44). Psychology Press. Search in Google Scholar

Kwak, H. (2012). Self-disclosure in online media: An active audience perspective. International Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 485–510. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-31-3-485-51010.2501/IJA-31-3-485-510 Search in Google Scholar

Lamm, H., & Trommsdorff, G. (1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3(4), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.242003040210.1002/ejsp.2420030402 Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Allen, J.A. (2018). Modeling temporal interaction dynamics in organizational settings. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(3), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9506-910.1007/s10869-017-9506-9 Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Allen, J.A. (2014). How fun are your meetings? Investigating the relationship between humor patterns in team interactions and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1278–1287. https://doi.org/10.1037/a003808310.1037/a0038083 Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Allen, J.A., & Kauffeld, S. (2013). A sequential analysis of procedural meeting communication: How teams facilitate their meetings. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 41(4), 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2013.84484710.1080/00909882.2013.844847 Search in Google Scholar

Leonardi, P.M. (2011). Innovation blindness: Culture, frames, and cross-boundary problem construction in the development of new technology concepts. Organization Science, 22(2), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.052910.1287/orsc.1100.0529 Search in Google Scholar

Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D.L., & Weingart, L.R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 779–793. https://doi.org/10.2307/306941510.2307/3069415 Search in Google Scholar

Maaravi, Y., Heller, B., Shoham, Y., Mohar, S., & Deutsch, B. (2020). Ideation in the digital age: literature review and integrative model for electronic brainstorming. Review of Managerial Science, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00400-510.1007/s11846-020-00400-5 Search in Google Scholar

Ma, H.H. (2009). The effect size of variables associated with creativity: A meta-analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040041080263340010.1080/10400410802633400 Search in Google Scholar

Marks, G. (2020). On CRM: should you, or should you not turn on your camera for that Zoom meeting? Forbes, May 1. https://www.forbes.com/sites/quickerbettertech/2020/05/01/on-crm-should-you-or-should-you-not-turn-on-your-camera-for-that-zoom-meeting/?sh=2595ba88bb06 Search in Google Scholar

Mathieu, J.E., Heffner, T.S., Goodwin, G.F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of applied psychology, 85(2), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.27310.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273 Search in Google Scholar

Marlow, S.L., Lacerenza, C.N., & Salas, E. (2017). Communication in virtual teams: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 575–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.00510.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.005 Search in Google Scholar

McGrath, J.E., & Hollingshead, A.B. (1993). Putting the group back in group support systems: Some theoretical issues about dynamic processes in groups with technological enhancements. In L.M. Jessup & J.S. Valacich (Eds.), Group support systems: New perspectives (pp. 78-96). New York: Macmillan. Search in Google Scholar

Mckinsey (2021). The future of work after COVID-19. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/the-future-of-work-after-covid-19% Search in Google Scholar

Medeiros, K.E., Watts, L.L., Mulhearn, T.J., Steele, L.M., Mumford, M.D., & Connelly, S. (2017). What is working, what is not, and what we need to know: A meta-analytic review of business ethics instruction. Journal of Academic Ethics, 15(3), 245–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-017-9281-210.1007/s10805-017-9281-2 Search in Google Scholar

Mesmer-Magnus, J., & DeChurch, L. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1109/emr.2012.617277410.1109/EMR.2012.6172774 Search in Google Scholar

Mesmer-Magnus, J.R., DeChurch, L.A., Jimenez-Rodriguez, M., Wildman, J., & Shuffler, M. (2011). A meta-analytic investigation of virtuality and information sharing in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.00210.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.002 Search in Google Scholar

Microsoft (2020). Microsoft Teams at 3: Everything you need to connect with your teammates and be more productive. https://www.microsoft.com/enus/microsoft-365/blog/2020/03/19/microsoft-teams-3-everything-you-need-connectteammates-be-more-productive/ Search in Google Scholar

Mueller, J., Melwani, S., Loewenstein, J., & Deal, J.J. (2018). Reframing the Decision-Makers’ Dilemma: Towards a Social Context Model of Creative Idea Recognition. Academy of Management Journal, 61, 94–110. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.088710.5465/amj.2013.0887 Search in Google Scholar

Mullen, B., Johnson, C, & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb02285610.1108/eb022856 Search in Google Scholar

Mumford, M.D., Feldman, J.M., Hein, M.B., & Nagao, D.J. (2001). Tradeoffs between ideas and structure: Individuals versus group performance in creative problem solving. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2001.tb01218.x10.1002/j.2162-6057.2001.tb01218.x Search in Google Scholar

Mumford, M.D., & Hunter, S.T. (2005). Innovation in organizations: A multi-level perspective on creativity. In: F. Dansereau & F.J. Yammarino (Eds.), Multi-level Issues in Strategy and Methods (Research in Multi-Level Issues, Vol. 4) (pp. 9–73). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-9144(05)04001-410.1016/S1475-9144(05)04001-4 Search in Google Scholar

Mumford, M.D., Mobley, M.I., Reiter-Palmon, R., Uhlman, C.E., & Doares, L.M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 91–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040041910953438010.1080/10400419109534380 Search in Google Scholar

Mumford, M., Reiter-Palmon, R, & Redmond, M. (1994). Problem construction and cognition: Applying problem representations in ill-defined domains. In M. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 3–39). Ablex Publishing Corporation. Search in Google Scholar

Mumford, M.D., Lonergan, D.C., & Scott, G. (2002). Evaluating Creative Ideas: Processes, standards, and context. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 22(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryct-news2002221310.5840/inquiryctnews20022213 Search in Google Scholar

Nemiro, J.E. (2002). The creative process in virtual teams. Communication Research Journal, 14(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1401_610.1207/S15326934CRJ1401_6 Search in Google Scholar

Nijstad, B.A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affect the mind: a cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10(3), 186–213. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_110.1207/s15327957pspr1003_1 Search in Google Scholar

Ocker, R.J. (2005). Influences on creativity in asynchronous virtual teams: A qualitative analysis of experimental teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2004.84329410.1109/TPC.2004.843294 Search in Google Scholar

O’Leary, M.B., & Cummings, J.N. (2007). The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. MIS Quarterly, (31), 433–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/2514880210.2307/25148802 Search in Google Scholar

Paulus, P., & Brown, V. (2003). Enhancing ideational creativity in groups: Lessons from research on brainstorming. In P.B. Paulus, B.A. Nijstad, & A. Bernard (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 110–136). Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195147308.003.0006 Search in Google Scholar

Reed, K.M. & Allen, J.A. (2021). Suddenly Virtual: Making Remote Meetings Work. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Search in Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R. (2018). Creative cognition at the individual and team levels: What happens before and after idea generation. In: R.J. Sternberg & J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Nature of Human Creativity (pp. 184–202). Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108185936.015 Search in Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., & Harms, M. (2017). Team creativity and innovation: Importance and directions. In: R.R. Palmon (Ed.), Team Creativity and Innovation (pp. 3–10). Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190222093.003.0001 Search in Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R, Herman, A.E., & Yammarino, F.J. (2008), Creativity and cognitive processes: Multi-level linkages between individual and team cognition. In: M.D. Mumford, S.T. Hunter, & K.E. Bedell-Avers (Eds.), Multi-Level Issues in Creativity and Innovation: Research in Multi-Level Issues (Vol. 7, pp. 203–267). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.10.1016/S1475-9144(07)00009-4 Search in Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., Kennel, V.L., & Allen, J.A. (2020). Teams in small organizations: Conceptual, methodological, and practical considerations. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1664–1078. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.53029110.3389/fpsyg.2021.530291 Search in Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., Kennel, V., Allen, J., & Jones, K.J. (2018). Good catch! using interdisciplinary teams and team reflexivity to improve patient safety. Group & Organization Management, 43(3), 414–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/154805181878182010.1177/1548051818781820 Search in Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., Kennel, V., de Vreede, T., & de Vreede, G.J. (2018). Structuring team idea evaluation and selection of solution: Does it influence creativity? (pp. 209–224). In I. Lebuda & V. Glavenou (Eds.), Pal-grave Handbook of Social Creativity Research. Palgrave Press.10.1007/978-3-319-95498-1_14 Search in Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., Mumford, M.D., O’Connor Boes, J., & Runco, M.A. (1997). Problem construction and creativity: The role of ability, cue consistency, and active processing. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1001_210.1207/s15326934crj1001_2 Search in Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., & Murugavel, V. (2018). The effect of problem construction on team process and creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2098. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.0209810.3389/fpsyg.2018.02098 Search in Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., & Robinson, E. (2009). Problem identification and construction: What do we know, what is the future? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/a001462910.1037/a0014629 Search in Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., Wigert, B., & Vreede, T.D. (2011). Team creativity and innovation: The effect of group composition, social processes, and cognition. In: M.D. Mumford (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp. 295–326). Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-374714-3.00013-6 Search in Google Scholar

Rice, R.E. (1992). Task analyzability, use of new media, and effectiveness: A multi-site exploration of media richness. Organization Science, 3(4), 475–500. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.4.47510.1287/orsc.3.4.475 Search in Google Scholar

Rietzschel, E.F., & Ritter, S.M. (2018). Moving from creativity to innovation. In R. Reiter-Palmon, V.L. Kennel, & J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), Individual creativity in the workplace (p. 3–34). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813238-8.00001-210.1016/B978-0-12-813238-8.00001-2 Search in Google Scholar

Rietzschel, E.F., Nijstad, B.A., & Stroebe, W. (2010). The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: Choosing between creativity and impact. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712609X41420410.1348/000712609X414204 Search in Google Scholar

Robert Half (2021). 1 In 3 Remote Workers May Quit If Required To Return To The Office Full Time, Robert Half Survey Finds. https://rh-us.mediaroom.com/2021-04-06-1-In-3-Remote-Workers-May-Quit-If-Required-To-Return-To-The-Office-Full-Time-Robert-Half-Survey-Finds Search in Google Scholar

Robey, D., Schwaig, K.S., & Jin, L. (2003). Intertwining material and virtual work. Information and organization, 13(2), 111–129.10.1016/S1471-7727(02)00025-8 Search in Google Scholar

Rosso, B.D. (2014). Creativity and constraints: Exploring the role of constraints in the creative processes of research and development teams. Organization Studies, 35(4), 551–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084061351760010.1177/0170840613517600 Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M.A., & Vega, L. (1990). Evaluating the creativity of children’s ideas. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5(5), 439–452. Search in Google Scholar

Saunders, C.S. (2000). Virtual teams: Piecing together the puzzle. In R.W. Zmud (Ed.), Framing the domain of IT management: Projecting the future… through the past (pp. 29–50). Pinnaflex. Search in Google Scholar

Shalley, C.E., & Gilson, L.L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.00410.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004 Search in Google Scholar

Shalley, C.E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G.R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.00710.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007 Search in Google Scholar

Sharma, A. (1999). Central dilemmas of managing innovation in large firms. California Management Review, 41, 146–164. https://doi.org/10.2307/4116600110.2307/41166001 Search in Google Scholar

Shearn, A. (2021). It’s time to start leaving our Zoom cameras off. Forge, February 18. https://forge.medium.com/its-time-to-start-leaving-our-zoom-cameras-off-c8a58bc66ae1 Search in Google Scholar

Sosik, J.J., Avolio, B.J., & Kahai, S.S. (1997). Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.8910.1037/0021-9010.82.1.89 Search in Google Scholar

Staples, D.S., & Webster, J. (2008). Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams. Information Systems Journal, 18(6), 617–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00244.x10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00244.x Search in Google Scholar

Sternberg, R.J. (1988). A three-facet model of creativity. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives (pp. 125–147). Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Suchan, J., & Hayzak, G. (2001). The communication characteristics of virtual teams: A case study. IEEE transactions on Professional Communication, 44(3), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1109/47.94646310.1109/47.946463 Search in Google Scholar

Suh, K.S. (1999). Impact of communication medium on task performance and satisfaction: an examination of media-richness theory. Information & Management, 35(5), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00097-410.1016/S0378-7206(98)00097-4 Search in Google Scholar

Sutton, R.I., & Hargadon, A. (1996). Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 685–718. https://doi.org/10.2307/239387210.2307/2393872 Search in Google Scholar

Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.5465/306934910.5465/3069349 Search in Google Scholar

Taggar, S. (2019). The cognitive underpinnings of creativity in teams: Distal and proximal antecedents. In P.B. Paulus & B.A. Nijstad (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Group Creativity and Innovation, 11–32. Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190648077.013.2 Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, E. (2013). Supplier integration in new product development: Computer mediated communication, knowledge exchange and buyer performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(6), 890–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.05.01810.1016/j.indmarman.2013.05.018 Search in Google Scholar

Toader, A.F., Cantner, U., & Kessler, T. (2019). The effect of team mental models divergence on creative performance during situational changes. Creativity Research Journal, 31(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.157720610.1080/10400419.2019.1577206 Search in Google Scholar

Toader, A. F., & Kessler, T. (2018). Team mental models, team goal orientations, and information elaboration, predicting team creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 30(4), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1530912 Search in Google Scholar

Vernon, D., & Hocking, I. (2016). Beyond belief: Structured techniques prove more effective than a placebo intervention in a problem construction task. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.10.00910.1016/j.tsc.2015.10.009 Search in Google Scholar

Ward, T.B., Smith, S.M., & Finke, R.A. (1999). Creative cognition. In: J.C. Kaufman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), Handbook of Creativity, 189–212. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807916.012 Search in Google Scholar

Wasche, V. (2020, November 19). Women, don’t turn your camera off for Zoom calls. Fast Company. https://www.fastcompany.com/90577160/women-dont-turn-your-camera-off-for-zoom-calls Search in Google Scholar

Weingart, L., Cronin, M., Houser, C., Cagan, J., & Vogel, C. (2005). Functional diversity and conflict in cross-functional product development teams: considering representational gaps and task characteristics. In L. Neider & C. Schriesheim (Eds.), Understanding Teams (pp. 89–100). IAP. Search in Google Scholar

Weingart, L.R., Todorova, G., & Cronin, M.A. (2008). Representational gaps, team integration and team creativity. Paper Presented at the Academy of Management 2008 Annual Meeting: The Questions We Ask, AOM 2008, Briarcliff Manor, NY.10.5465/ambpp.2008.33662047 Search in Google Scholar

West, M.A., & Anderson, N.R. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 680–693. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.68010.1037/0021-9010.81.6.680 Search in Google Scholar

White, M. (2014). The management of virtual teams and virtual meetings. Business Information Review, 31(2), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F026638211454097910.1177/0266382114540979 Search in Google Scholar

Zajac, S., Gregory, M.E., Bedwell, W.L., Kramer, W.S., & Salas, E. (2014). The cognitive underpinnings of adaptive team performance in ill-defined task situations: A closer look at team cognition. Organizational Psychology Review, 4(1), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/204138661349278710.1177/2041386613492787 Search in Google Scholar