[
Abram, D. 1997. Perception and Language in the More-Than-Human World. New York: Vintage e-Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Böhme, G. 1992. Natürlich Natur: Über Natur im Zeitalter ihrer technischen Reproduzierbarkeit. Frankfurt/a. M.: Suhrkamp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bogost, I. 2012. Alien Phenomenology, or, What it's like to be a thing. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bryant, L. R. 2011. The Democracy of Objects. London: Open Humanities Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Collins, R. W. 2018. What does it mean to be human, and not animal? Examining Montaigne’s literary persuasiveness in “Man is no better than the animals”. Sloth: A Journal of Emerging Voices in Human-Animal Studies, 4(1): 1–9. https://www.animalsandsociety.org/human-animal-studies/sloth/sloth-volume-4-no-1-winter-2018/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grusin, R. 2015. The Nonhuman Turn. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harman, G. 2008. Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. London: Pelican.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harman, G. 2010. Towards Speculative Realism: Essays and Lectures. Alresford: John Hunt Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haraway, D. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hayles, N. K. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Latour, B. 1996. On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt 47(4): 369–381.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Latour, B. 1990. La clef berlinoise : ou inscrire dans la nature des choses. Alliage : Culture – Science – Technique 6 : 4–15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leach, E. 1964. Anthropological aspects of language: Animal categories and verbal abuse. In: Lenneberg, E. (ed.). New Directions in the Study of Language, 23–63. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maran, T. 2020. Ecosemiotics: The Study of Signs in Changing Ecologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Montaigne, M
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nöth. W. 2000. Handbuch der Semiotik, 2nd rev. edn. Stuttgart: Metzler.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nöth. W. 2002a. Paradigmen des Dualismus “Kultur vs. Natur” und Ansätze zu dessen Dekonstruktion. In Helduser, U. and Schwietring, T. Kultur und ihre Wissenschaft. Konstanz: UVK, 49–68.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nöth. W. 2002b. Semiotic machines. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 9(1): 5–22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nöth. W. 2009. On the instrumentality and semiotic agency of signs, tools, and intelligent machines. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 16(3–4): 11–36.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nöth. W. 2015. Levi R. Bryant’s universe perfused with machines. Language and Semiotic Studies (Suzhou) 1(2): 113–120.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nöth, W. 2018. Varieties of nonhuman semiosis. In Quaresma, A. (ed.) Artificial Intelligences: Essays on Inorganic and Nonbiological Systems, 179–192. Madrid: Global Knowledge Academics.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nöth. W. 2019. Peirce on the continuity between human and nonhuman minds. In Middelhoff, F. et al. (eds.). Texts, Animals, Environments: Zoopoetics and Ecopoetics, 139–155 (= Animal Studies 3). Freiburg: Rombach.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nöth, W. 2021. Peirce’s legacy for contemporary consciousness studies, the emergence of consciousness from qualia, and its evanescence in habits. Semiotica, 243: 49–103.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nöth, W. and Kull, K. (eds.). 2001. The Semiotics of Nature. Tartu: Tartu University Press (= Sign Systems Studies, 29[1]).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oelze, A. 2018. Animal Rationality: Later Medieval Theories 1250–1350. Leiden: Brill.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peirce, C. S. 1931–1958. Collected Papers, vols. 1–6, C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (eds.); vols. 7–8, Arthur W. Burks (ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1931-35. (Quoted CP.)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peirce, C. S. 1963–1966. The Charles S. Peirce Papers. [30 reels, 3rd microfilm edition.] Cambridge, MA: The Houghton Library, Harvard University, Microreproduction Service, 1963–1966. Microfilm. (Quoted MS.)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Santaella, L. 1994. Peirce's broad concept of mind. European Journal for Semiotic Studies, 6(3–4): 399–411.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Santaella, L. 2004. O método anticartesiano de C. S. Peirce. São Paulo: Editora UNESP.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Santaella, L. 2003. Culturas e artes do pós-humano: Da cultura das mídias à cibercultura. São Paulo: Paulus.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shaviro, S. 2011). The universe of things. Theory and Event, 14(3): 1–17.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tye, M. 2017. Tense Bees and Shell-Shocked Crabs: Are Animals Conscious? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vartanian, A. 1973. Man-machine from the Greeks to the computer. In Wiener, P. (ed.). Dictionary of the History of Ideas, vol. 3, 131–146. New York: Scribner.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wild, M. 2006. Die anthropologische Differenz: Der Geist der Tiere in der frühen Neuzeit bei Montaigne, Descartes und Hume. Berlin: de Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
