1. bookVolumen 6 (2020): Edición 2 (December 2020)
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
2459-5616
Primera edición
16 Apr 2016
Calendario de la edición
2 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés
Acceso abierto

Comparative analysis of stock selection using a hybrid MCDM approach and modern portfolio theory

Publicado en línea: 05 Jan 2021
Volumen & Edición: Volumen 6 (2020) - Edición 2 (December 2020)
Páginas: 58 - 68
Recibido: 15 Oct 2020
Aceptado: 02 Dec 2020
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
2459-5616
Primera edición
16 Apr 2016
Calendario de la edición
2 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés

1. Aouni, B., Doumpos, M., Pérez-Gladish, B., Steuer, R. E. (2018). On the increasing importance of multiple criteria decision aid methods for portfolio selection, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 69, No. 10, pp. 1525-1542. Search in Google Scholar

2. Arkan, T. (2016). The Importance of Financial Ratios in Predicting Stock Price Trends: A Case Study in Emerging Markets. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, Vol. 1, No. 69, pp. 13-26.10.18276/frfu.2016.79-01 Search in Google Scholar

3. Astuty, P. (2017). The Influence of Fundamental Factors and Systematic Risk to Stock Prices on Companies Listed in the Indonesian Stock Exchange. European Research Studies Journal, Vol. XX, No. 4A, pp. 230-240.10.35808/ersj/830 Search in Google Scholar

4. Bernardo, J. J., Blin, J. M. (1977). A Programming Model of Consumer Choice Among Multi-Attributed Brands. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 111-118.10.1086/208686 Search in Google Scholar

5. Fazli, S., Jafari, H. (2002). Developing a hybrid multi-criteria model for investment in stock exchange. Management Science Letters, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 457-468. Search in Google Scholar

6. Ginting, G., Fadlina, M., Siahaan, A. P. U., Rahim, R. (2017). Technical Approach of TOPSIS in Decision Making. International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering & Research, Vol. 3, No. 8, pp. 58-64. Search in Google Scholar

7. Graham, B., Zweig, J., Buffett, W. (2003). The Intelligent Investor. Harper Collins Publishers, London. Search in Google Scholar

8. Hatami-Marbini, A., Kangi, F. (2017). An extension of fuzzy TOPSIS for a group decision making with an application to Tehran stock exchange. Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 52, pp. 1084-1097.10.1016/j.asoc.2016.09.021 Search in Google Scholar

9. Hsu, L. C. (2014). A hybrid multiple criteria decision-making model for investment decision making. Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 509-529.10.3846/16111699.2012.722563 Search in Google Scholar

10. Kou, G., Lu, Y., Peng, Y., Shi, Y. (2012). Evaluation of classification algorithms using MCDM and rank correlation. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 197-225.10.1142/S0219622012500095 Search in Google Scholar

11. Marasović, B. (2009). Comparison of Optimal Portfolios Selected by Multicriterial Model Using Absolute and Relative Criteria Values. Investigacion Operacional, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 20-31. Search in Google Scholar

12. Marasović, B., Babić, Z. (2011). Two-step multi-criteria model for selecting optimal portfolio. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 134, No. 1, pp. 58-66.10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.04.026 Search in Google Scholar

13. Markowitz, H. M. (1959). Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investment. Yale UniversityPress, NewHaven, CT. Search in Google Scholar

14. Marqués, A. I., García, V., Sánchez, J. S. (2020). Ranking-based MCDM models in financial management applications: analysis and emerging challenges. Progress in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 9, pp. 171-193.10.1007/s13748-020-00207-1 Search in Google Scholar

15. Miťková, V., Mlynarovič, V. (2007). A performance and risk analysis on the Slovak private pension funds market. Ekonomický časopis (Journal of Economics), Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 232-249. Search in Google Scholar

16. Podvezko, V. (2011). The Comparative Analysis of MCDA Methods SAW and COPRAS. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 134-146.10.5755/j01.ee.22.2.310 Search in Google Scholar

17. Poklepović, T., Babić, Z. (2014). Stock selection using a hybrid MCDM approach. Croatian Operational Research Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 273-290.10.17535/crorr.2014.0013 Search in Google Scholar

18. Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of services sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 83-98.10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590 Search in Google Scholar

19. Statman, M. (2014). Behavioral finance: Finance with normal people. Borsa Istanbul Review, Vol. 14, pp. 65-73.10.1016/j.bir.2014.03.001 Search in Google Scholar

20. Velasquez, M., Hester, P. T. (2013). An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods. International Journal of Operations Research, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 56-66. Search in Google Scholar

21. Vetschera, R., De Almeida, A. T. (2012). A PROMETHEE-based approach to portfolio selection problems. Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 39, pp. 1010-1020.10.1016/j.cor.2011.06.019 Search in Google Scholar

22. Xidonas, P., Mavrotas, G., Psarras, J. (2009). A multicriteria methodology for equity selection using financial analysis. Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 36, No. 12, pp. 3187-3203.10.1016/j.cor.2009.02.009 Search in Google Scholar

23. Zagreb Stock Exchange (2019). Regulated Market Store Overview. Available at: https://zse.hr/default.aspx?id=26495 [11 January 2019]. Search in Google Scholar

24. Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2011). Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 397-427.10.3846/20294913.2011.593291 Search in Google Scholar

25. Zopounidis, C., Doumpos, M. (2002). Multi-criteria decision aid in financial decision making: methodologies and literature review. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 11, pp. 167-186.10.1002/mcda.333 Search in Google Scholar

Artículos recomendados de Trend MD

Planifique su conferencia remota con Sciendo