[Boran, F.E., Genc, S., Kurt, M., Akay, D., 2009. A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 8, 11363-11368, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.03910.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.039]Search in Google Scholar
[Buyukozkan, G., Cifci, G., 2012. A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers, Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 3, 3000-3011, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.16210.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.162]Search in Google Scholar
[Dagdeviren, M., Yavuz, S., Kilinc, N., 2009. Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 4, 8143-8151, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.01610.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Mu, E., Pereyra-Rojas, M., 2017. Practical Decision Making. SpringerBriefs in Operations Research, Appendix A: Practical Questions Related to AHP Modeling, 105-106, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-33861-310.1007/978-3-319-33861-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Nadaban, S., Dzitac, S., Dzitac, I., 2016. Fuzzy TOPSIS: A General View, Procedia Computer Science, 91, 823-831, DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.08810.1016/j.procs.2016.07.088]Search in Google Scholar
[Pacana, A., Siwiec, D., Bednárová, L. 2019. Analysis of the incompatibility of the product with fluorescent method, Metalurgija, 58(3-4), 337-340.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rudnik, K., Kacprzak, D., 2015. Rozmyta metoda TOPSIS wykorzystują skierowane liczby rozmyte, PTZP, 958-986.]Search in Google Scholar
[Siwiec, D., Bednárowá, L., Pacana, A. 2020. Metoda doboru penetrantów dla przemysłowych badań nieniszczących, Przemysł Chemiczny, 99(5), 771-773, DOI: 10.15199/62.2020.5.1810.15199/62.2020.5.18]Search in Google Scholar
[Siwiec, D., Bednárowá, L., Pacana, A., Zawada, M., Rusko, M. 2019. Wspomaganie decyzji w procesie doboru penetrantów fluorescencyjnych do przemysłowych badań nieniszczących, Przemysł Chemiczny, 98(10), 1594-1596, DOI: 10.15199/62.2019.10.1210.15199/62.2019.10.12]Search in Google Scholar
[Sun, C.C., 2010. A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 12, 7745-7754, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.06610.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.066]Search in Google Scholar
[Suner, A., Celikoglu, C., Dicle, O., Sokmen, S., 2012. Sequential decision tree using the analytic hierarchy process for decision support in rectal cancer. Artjfjcal Intelligence in Medicine, 1-10, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2012.05.00310.1016/j.artmed.2012.05.00322776889]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, T.C., Chang, T.H., 2007. Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment, Expert Systems with Applications, 33, 4, 870-880, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.07.00310.1016/j.eswa.2006.07.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, T.C., Lee, H.D., 2010. Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 5, 8980-8985, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.03510.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.035]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, Y.M., Elhag, T., 2006. Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment, Expert Systems with Applications, 31, 2, 309-319, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.09.04010.1016/j.eswa.2005.09.040]Search in Google Scholar
[Xu, Z., Zhang, X., 2013. Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information, Knowledge-Based Systems, 52, 53-64, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.05.01110.1016/j.knosys.2013.05.011]Search in Google Scholar