[
1. Malinowska M, Tokarz-Deptuła B, Deptuła W. Mikrobiom człowieka. Post Mikrobiol. 2017;56:33–42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Chałas R, Wójcik-Chęcińska I, Woźniak MJ, Grzonka J, Święszkowski W, Kurzydłowski KJ. Płytka bakteryjna jako biofilm – zagrożenia w jamie ustnej oraz sposoby zapobiegania. Postepy Hig Med Dosw. 2015;69:1140–8.10.5604/17322693.1173925
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Wójtowicz A, Malm A. Mikrobiologiczne podłoże próchnicy w aspekcie jej profilaktyki. Farm Pol. 2009;65:327–30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Szymańska JI, Olejnik E. Stosowanie płynów do jamy ustnej przez młodzież 17-letnią. Med Og Nauk Zdr. 2020;26:275–9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Stanisz A. Przystępny kurs statystyki z zastosowaniem STATISTICA PL na przykładach z medycyny. Tom 1. Statystyki podstawowe. (ed. III) Kraków: Statsoft Polska; 2006.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Fernandez y Mostajo M, Exterkate RAM, Bujis MJ, Crielaard W. Effect of mouthwashes on the composition and metabolic activity of biofilms grown in vitro. Clin Oral Invest. 2017;21:1221–30.10.1007/s00784-016-1876-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Jothika M, Vanajassun P, Someshwar B. Effectiveness of probiotic, chlorhexidine and fluoride mouthwash against Streptococcus mutans – randomized, single-blind, in vivo study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015;5:44–8.10.4103/2231-0762.156153
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Latimer J, Munday JL, Buzza KM, Forbes S, Sreenivasan P, McBain AJ. Antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity of mouthrinses containing cetylpyridinium chloride and sodium fluoride. BMC Microbiology. 2015;15:169. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26293609 (available 20.05.2020.).10.1186/s12866-015-0501-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Jauhari D, Srivastava N, Rana V, Chandna P. Comparative evaluation on the effects of fluoride mouthrinse, herbal mouthrinse and oil pulling on the caries activity and Streptococcus mutans count using Oratest and Dentocult SM Strip Mutans Kit. Int J Clin Ped Dent. 2015;8:114–8.10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1295
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Perala SR, Bhupathiraju P. Efficacy of four fluoride mouth rinse on Streptococcus mutans in high caries risk children – a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10,9:56–60.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Sajadi FS, Moradi M, Pardakhty A, Yazdizadeh R. Effect of fluoride, chlorhexidine and fluor-chlorhexidine mouthwashes on salivary Streptococcus mutans count and the prevalence of oral side effects. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospect. 2015;9:49–52.10.15171/joddd.2015.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Lakade LS, Shah P, Shirol D. Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine and combination mouthrinse in reducing the Mutans streptococcus count in plaque. J Indian Soc Pedodont Prevent Dent. 2014;32:91–6.10.4103/0970-4388.130780
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Sundas S, Rao A. Comparative evaluation of chlorhexidne and sodium fluoride mouthwashes on Streptococcus mutans. J Nepal Dent Assoc. 2011;12:17–21.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Yoshihara A, Sakuma S, Kobayashi S, Miyazaki H. Antimicrobial effect of fluoride mouthrinse on Mutans streptococci and Lactobacilli in saliva. Pediatr Dent. 2001;23:113–7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Wrzyszcz-Kowalczyk A, Herman K, Jankowska K, Dębska-Mysiak M. Ocena kliniczna płukanki Dentofresh Junior® dla dzieci powyżej 6. roku życia. Dent Med Probl. 2012;49:40–7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Pan PC, Harper S, Ricci-Nittel D, Lux R, Shi W. In-vitro evidence for efficacy of antimicrobial mouthrinses. J Dent. 2010;38:16–20.10.1016/S0300-5712(10)70006-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Sharma A, Agarwal N, Anand A, Jabin Z. To compare the effectiveness of different mouthrinses on Streptococcus mutans count in caries active children. J Oral Biol Craniofacial Res. 2018;8:113–7.10.1016/j.jobcr.2018.05.002599346929892532
]Search in Google Scholar
, 