This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Anderson, S. P., De Palma, A., & Thisse, J. F. (1987). The CES is a discrete choice model? Economics Letters, 24(2), 139–140.AndersonS. P.De PalmaA.ThisseJ. F.1987The CES is a discrete choice model?24213914010.1016/0165-1765(87)90239-4Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, S. P., De Palma, A., & Thisse, J. F. (1988). The CES and the logit: Two related models of heterogeneity. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 18(1), 155–164.AndersonS. P.De PalmaA.ThisseJ. F.1988The CES and the logit: Two related models of heterogeneity18115516410.1016/0166-0462(88)90009-9Search in Google Scholar
Antosiewicz, M., Nikas, A., Szpor, A., Witajewski-Baltvilks, J., & Doukas, H. (2020). Pathways for the transition of the polish power sector and associated risks. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 35, 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.008.AntosiewiczM.NikasA.SzporA.Witajewski-BaltvilksJ.DoukasH.2020Pathways for the transition of the polish power sector and associated risks35271291https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.008.10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.008Search in Google Scholar
Ashenfelter, O. C., Farber, H., & Ransom, M. R. (2010). Labor market monopsony. Journal of Labor Economics, 28(2), 203–210.AshenfelterO. C.FarberH.RansomM. R.2010Labor market monopsony28220321010.1086/653654Search in Google Scholar
Balistreri, E. J., & Rutherford, T. F. (2013). Computing general equilibrium theories of monopolistic competition and heterogeneous firms. In P. Dixon, D. Jorgenson (Eds.), Handbook of computable general equilibrium modeling (pp. 1513–1570). Elsevier.BalistreriE. J.RutherfordT. F.2013Computing general equilibrium theories of monopolistic competition and heterogeneous firmsInDixonP.JorgensonD.(Eds.),15131570Elsevier10.1016/B978-0-444-59568-3.00023-7Search in Google Scholar
Baran, J., Szpor, A., & Witajewski-Baltvilks, J. (2020). Low-carbon transition in a coal-producing Country: A labour market perspective. Energy Policy, 147, 111878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111878.BaranJ.SzporA.Witajewski-BaltvilksJ.2020Low-carbon transition in a coal-producing Country: A labour market perspective147111878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111878.10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111878Search in Google Scholar
Boeters, S., & Savard, L. (2013). The labor market in computable general equilibrium models. In P. Dixon, D. Jorgenson (Eds.), Handbook of computable general equilibrium modeling (pp. 1645–1718). Elsevier.BoetersS.SavardL.2013The labor market in computable general equilibrium modelsInDixonP.JorgensonD.(Eds.),16451718Elsevier10.1016/B978-0-444-59568-3.00026-2Search in Google Scholar
Böhringer, C. (2000). Cooling down hot air: A global CGE analysis of post-Kyoto Carbon Abatement Strategies. Energy Policy, 28(11), 779–789.BöhringerC.2000Cooling down hot air: A global CGE analysis of post-Kyoto Carbon Abatement Strategies281177978910.1016/S0301-4215(00)00060-4Search in Google Scholar
Böhringer, C., & Rutherford, T. F. (2000). Decomposing the cost of kyoto: A global CGE analysis of multilateral policy impacts. ZEW Discussion Paper No 00-11. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.374764.BöhringerC.RutherfordT. F.2000ZEW Discussion Paper No 00-11. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.374764.10.2139/ssrn.374764Search in Google Scholar
Böhringer, C., Rivers, N. J., Rutherford, T. F., & Wigle, R. (2012). Green jobs and renewable electricity policies: Employment impacts of ontario’s feed-in tariff. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/1935-1682.3217.BöhringerC.RiversN. J.RutherfordT. F.WigleR.2012Green jobs and renewable electricity policies: Employment impacts of ontario’s feed-in tariff121https://doi.org/10.1515/1935-1682.3217.10.1515/1935-1682.3217Search in Google Scholar
Booth, A. L., & Katic, P. (2011). Estimating the wage elasticity of labour supply to a firm: What evidence is there for monopsony? Economic Record, 87(278), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2011.00728.x.BoothA. L.KaticP.2011Estimating the wage elasticity of labour supply to a firm: What evidence is there for monopsony?87278359369https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2011.00728.x.10.1111/j.1475-4932.2011.00728.xSearch in Google Scholar
Bureau, B. (2011). Distributional effects of a carbon tax on car fuels in France. Energy Economics, 33(1), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.07.011.BureauB.2011Distributional effects of a carbon tax on car fuels in France331121130https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.07.011.10.1016/j.eneco.2010.07.011Search in Google Scholar
Cronin, J. A., Fullerton, D., & Sexton, S. (2019). Vertical and horizontal redistributions from a carbon tax and rebate. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 6(S1), S169–S208.CroninJ. A.FullertonD.SextonS.2019Vertical and horizontal redistributions from a carbon tax and rebate6S1S169S20810.3386/w23250Search in Google Scholar
Da Silva Freitas, L. F., de Santana Ribeiro, L. C., de Souza, K. B., & Hewings, G. J. D. (2016). The distributional effects of emissions taxation in Brazil and their implications for climate policy. Energy Economics, 59, 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.07.021.Da Silva FreitasL. F.de Santana RibeiroL. C.de SouzaK. B.HewingsG. J. D.2016The distributional effects of emissions taxation in Brazil and their implications for climate policy593744https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.07.021.10.1016/j.eneco.2016.07.021Search in Google Scholar
Davis, L. W., & Knittel, C. R. (2019). Are fuel economy standards regressive? Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 6(S1), S37–S63. https://doi.org/10.1086/701187.DavisL. W.KnittelC. R.2019Are fuel economy standards regressive?6S1S37S63https://doi.org/10.1086/701187.10.3386/w22925Search in Google Scholar
Dixon, P., & Rimmer, M. T. (2002). Dynamic general equilibrium modelling for forecasting and policy: A practical guide and documentation of MONASH (Vol. 256). Elsevier.DixonP.RimmerM. T.2002256ElsevierSearch in Google Scholar
Dixon, P., & Rimmer, M. T. (2008). Welfare effects of unilateral changes in tariffs: The case of motor vehicles and parts in Australia. Working Paper No. G-177, Centre of Policy Studies (CoPS).DixonP.RimmerM. T.2008Working Paper No. G-177, Centre of Policy Studies (CoPS).Search in Google Scholar
Dixon, P., Jerie, M., & Rimmer, M. T. (2016). Modern trade theory for CGE modelling: The Armington, Krugman and Melitz models. Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 1(1), 1–110.DixonP.JerieM.RimmerM. T.2016Modern trade theory for CGE modelling: The Armington, Krugman and Melitz models11111010.21642/JGEA.010101AFSearch in Google Scholar
European Commission. (2020). Commission Welcomes the Political Agreement on the Just Transition Fund. Press Release, December 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_2354 [Accessed 4 January 2021].European Commission2020Press ReleaseDecember2020https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_2354 [Accessed 4 January 2021].Search in Google Scholar
Growiec, J. (2013). A microfoundation for normalized CES production functions with factor-augmenting technical change. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 37(11), 2336–2350.GrowiecJ.2013A microfoundation for normalized CES production functions with factor-augmenting technical change37112336235010.1016/j.jedc.2013.06.006Search in Google Scholar
Hanslow, K. (2000). A General Welfare Decomposition for CGE Models. GTAP Technical Paper No. 19, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University. https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/185.pdf.HanslowK.2000GTAP Technical Paper No. 19,Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue Universityhttps://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/185.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Huang, H., Roland-Holst, D., Wang, C., & Cai, W. (2020). China’s income gap and inequality under clean energy transformation: A CGE model assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, 119626.HuangH.Roland-HolstD.WangC.CaiW.2020China’s income gap and inequality under clean energy transformation: A CGE model assessment25111962610.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119626Search in Google Scholar
Huff, K., & Hertel, T. W. (2001). Decomposing welfare changes in GTAP. GTAP Technical Paper No. 308, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University. https://ideas.repec.org/p/gta/techpp/308.html.HuffK.HertelT. W.2001GTAP Technical Paper No. 308,Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue Universityhttps://ideas.repec.org/p/gta/techpp/308.html.Search in Google Scholar
IPCC (2014). Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/.IPCC2014https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/.Search in Google Scholar
Kiuila, O. (2018). Decarbonisation perspectives for the polish economy. Energy Policy, 118(C), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.048.KiuilaO.2018Decarbonisation perspectives for the polish economy118C6976https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.048.10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.048Search in Google Scholar
Küster, R., Ellersdorfer, I. R., & Fahl, U. (2007). A CGE analysis of energy policies considering labor market imperfections and technology specifications. FEEM Working Paper No. 7.2007. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.960725.KüsterR.EllersdorferI. R.FahlU.2007FEEM Working Paper No. 7.2007. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.960725.10.2139/ssrn.960725Search in Google Scholar
Leipprand, A., & Flachsland, C. (2018). Regime destabilization in energy transitions: The German Debate on the future of coal. Energy Research & Social Science, 40, 190–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.02.004.LeipprandA.FlachslandC.2018Regime destabilization in energy transitions: The German Debate on the future of coal40190204https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.02.004.10.1016/j.erss.2018.02.004Search in Google Scholar
Levinson, A. (2019). Energy efficiency standards are more regressive than energy taxes: Theory and evidence. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 6(S1), S7–S36.LevinsonA.2019Energy efficiency standards are more regressive than energy taxes: Theory and evidence6S1S7S3610.3386/w22956Search in Google Scholar
Manning, A. (2003). Monopsony in motion: Imperfect competition in labor markets. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.ManningA.2003New JerseyPrinceton University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., & Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic theory (Vol. 1). New York: Oxford University Press.Mas-ColellA.WhinstonM. D.GreenJ. R.19951New YorkOxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar
Matveenko, A. (2020). Logit, CES, and rational inattention. Economics Letters, 186, 108537.MatveenkoA.2020Logit, CES, and rational inattention18610853710.1016/j.econlet.2019.108537Search in Google Scholar
Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725.MelitzM. J.2003The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity7161695172510.3386/w8881Search in Google Scholar
Rengs, B., Scholz-Wäckerle, M., & van den Bergh, J. (2020). Evolutionary macroeconomic assessment of employment and innovation impacts of climate policy packages. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 169, 332–368.RengsB.Scholz-WäckerleM.van den BerghJ.2020Evolutionary macroeconomic assessment of employment and innovation impacts of climate policy packages16933236810.1016/j.jebo.2019.11.025Search in Google Scholar
Riahi, K., van Vuuren, D. P., Kriegler, E., Edmonds, J., O’Neill, B. C., Fujimori, S., … & Tavoni, M. (2017). The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. Global Environmental Change, 42, 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009.RiahiK.van VuurenD. P.KrieglerE.EdmondsJ.O’NeillB. C.FujimoriS.TavoniM.2017The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview42153168https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009Search in Google Scholar
Rogelj, J., Popp, A., Calvin, K. V., Luderer, G., Emmerling, J., Gernaat, D., … & Tavoni, M. (2018). Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C. Nature Climate Change, 8(4), 325–332.RogeljJ.PoppA.CalvinK. V.LudererG.EmmerlingJ.GernaatD.TavoniM.2018Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C8432533210.1038/s41558-018-0091-3Search in Google Scholar
Sartor, O. (2018). Implementing coal transitions. Insights from case studies of major coal-consuming economies. IDDRI and Climate Strategies.SartorO.2018IDDRI and Climate StrategiesSearch in Google Scholar
Skoczkowski, T., Bielecki, S., Kochański, M. & Korczak, K. (2020). Climate-change induced uncertainties, risks and opportunities for the coal-based region of Silesia: Stakeholders’ perspectives. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 35, 460–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.06.001.SkoczkowskiT.BieleckiS.KochańskiM.KorczakK.2020Climate-change induced uncertainties, risks and opportunities for the coal-based region of Silesia: Stakeholders’ perspectives35460481https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.06.001.10.1016/j.eist.2019.06.001Search in Google Scholar
Spencer, T., Colombier, M., Sartor, O., Garg, A., Tiwari, V., Burton, J., … & Wiseman, J. (2018). The 1.5 °C target and coal sector transition: At the limits of societal feasibility. Climate Policy, 18(3), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1386540.SpencerT.ColombierM.SartorO.GargA.TiwariV.BurtonJ.WisemanJ.2018The 1.5 °C target and coal sector transition: At the limits of societal feasibility183335351https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1386540.10.1080/14693062.2017.1386540Search in Google Scholar
Swilling, M., Musango, J., & Wakeford, J. (2016). Developmental states and sustainability transitions: Prospects of a just transition in South Africa. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 650–672, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1107716.SwillingM.MusangoJ.WakefordJ.2016Developmental states and sustainability transitions: Prospects of a just transition in South Africa1856506722016https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1107716.10.1080/1523908X.2015.1107716Search in Google Scholar
Turnheim, B., & Geels, F. W. (2012). Regime destabilisation as the flipside of energy transitions: Lessons from the history of the British Coal Industry (1913–1997). Energy Policy, 50(C), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.060.TurnheimB.GeelsF. W.2012Regime destabilisation as the flipside of energy transitions: Lessons from the history of the British Coal Industry (1913–1997)50C3549https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.060.10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.060Search in Google Scholar