Quality attributes in the non-market stated-preference based valuation of cultural goods
26 mar 2020
Acerca de este artículo
Publicado en línea: 26 mar 2020
Páginas: 132 - 150
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ceej-2019-0012
Palabras clave
© 2019 Aleksandra Wiśniewska, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Type of play and similar taxonomies_ Literature review
Repertoire classification | Written before 1900 (“classic”) | |
Repertoire classification | “Classic” play (written before 1900) | |
Repertoire classification | “Classics”: author died before 1900 | |
Genre | Comedy | |
Genre | Classic | |
Production type | Comedy | |
Repertoire classification/type of a play | Comedy | |
Type of play | Drama | |
Context | Written before 1900 | |
Type of production | Modern | |
Entertainment |
Quality dimensions from two projects
Relevance (A/E) | It had something to say about today’s world/the world in which we live |
Captivation (A/E) | It was absorbing and held my attention |
Originality (A/E) | It was ground-breaking |
Distinctiveness (A/E) | It was different from things I have experienced before |
Excellence – global (A/E) | It was amongst the best of its type [in the world] |
Excellence – local (A/E) | It was amongst the best of its type [in Australia] |
Risk (A/E) | The artists/curators really challenged themselves with this |
Rigor (A/E) | It seemed well thought through and put together |
Presentation (E) | It was well produced and presented |
Challenge (E) | It was thought-provoking |
Enthusiasm (E) | I would come to something like this again |
Local impact (E) | It is important that it is happening here |
Concept (E) | It was an interesting idea |