<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>This experimental investigation describes an extensive series of reduced laboratory scale tests, conducted on circular and ring footing models rested on a geogrid reinforced cohesionless soil. The study examined the impact of several factors at different relative sand densities, such as the inner to the outer diameter ratio of the ring footing, the number of geogrid reinforcements, the depth of the initial reinforcement, and the vertical spacing between the geogrids, as well as the geogrid stiffness. The results indicated that the optimum diameter ratio of ring footings resting on loose or medium-dense cohesionless soil is 0.40 at which the maximum bearing capacity is reached, leading in a cost-effective design of the footings, while for the dense soil, a diameter ratio of 0.45 is the optimal ratio. Also, the results indicated that the optimum number of reinforcement layers which after the bearing capacity improvement can be considered negligible is three layers for the circular footing and four layers for the ring footing model. To achieve the maximum increase in bearing capacity, the study identifies optimal values for the depth of the first geogrid reinforcement layer and the vertical spacing between reinforcements, which apply to circular and ring footing. While the stiffness of the reinforcement has a significant effect on the bearing capacity, this effect is not proportional.</p>
</abstract>

This experimental investigation describes an extensive series of reduced laboratory scale tests, conducted on circular and ring footing models rested on a geogrid reinforced cohesionless soil. The study examined the impact of several factors at different relative sand densities, such as the inner to the outer diameter ratio of the ring footing, the number of geogrid reinforcements, the depth of the initial reinforcement, and the vertical spacing between the geogrids, as well as the geogrid stiffness. The results indicated that the optimum diameter ratio of ring footings resting on loose or medium-dense cohesionless soil is 0.40 at which the maximum bearing capacity is reached, leading in a cost-effective design of the footings, while for the dense soil, a diameter ratio of 0.45 is the optimal ratio. Also, the results indicated that the optimum number of reinforcement layers which after the bearing capacity improvement can be considered negligible is three layers for the circular footing and four layers for the ring footing model. To achieve the maximum increase in bearing capacity, the study identifies optimal values for the depth of the first geogrid reinforcement layer and the vertical spacing between reinforcements, which apply to circular and ring footing. While the stiffness of the reinforcement has a significant effect on the bearing capacity, this effect is not proportional.

Experimental Investigation of Bearing Capacity of Circular and Ring Footings on Geogrid-Reinforced Cohesionless Soils

College of Engineering, Tikrit University

Civil and Environmental Engineering

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This experimental investigation describes an extensive series of reduced laboratory scale tests, conducted on circular and ring footing models rested on a...

Experimental Investigation of Bearing Capacity of Circular and Ring Footings on Geogrid-Reinforced Cohesionless Soils

Publicado en línea: 26 jun 2024

Páginas: 349 - 363

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2024-0027

Palabras clave
Bearing capacity, Circular and ring footing, Geogrid, Reinforced sand

© 2024 Hashim Al-Sumaiday et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Experimental Investigation of Bearing Capacity of Circular and Ring Footings on Geogrid-Reinforced Cohesionless Soils

Publicado en línea: 26 jun 2024

Páginas: 349 - 363

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2024-0027

Palabras claveBearing capacity, Circular and ring footing, Geogrid, Reinforced sand

© 2024 Hashim Al-Sumaiday et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Palabras clave
Bearing capacity, Circular and ring footing, Geogrid, Reinforced sand