[
Aiken, L. S., West, S. G. and Reno, R. R. (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage Publications, Inc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bichler, M., Kersten, G. and Strecker, S. (2003) Towards a structured design of electronic negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12(4), 311–335. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024867820235
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chrzan, K. (1994) Three kinds of order effects in choice-based conjoint analysis. Marketing Letters, 5(2), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994106
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davis, F. D. (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340.10.2307/249008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Edwards, W. and Barron, F. H. (1994) SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60(3), 306–325.10.1006/obhd.1994.1087
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V. and Heier, H. (1996) Individual differences in intuitive–experiential and analytical–rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 390–405.10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.390
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gershon, M. and Duckstein, L. (1984) A procedure for selection of a multiobjective technique with application to water and mineral resources. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 14(3), 245–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/0096-3003(84)90024-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gershon, M. E. (1981) Model choice in multi-objective decision-making in natural resource systems [Dissertation]. University of Arizona.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hobbs, B. F. (1986) What can we learn from experiments in multiobjective decision analysis? IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 16(3), 384–394.10.1109/TSMC.1986.4308970
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S. and Sturdivant, R. (2013) Applied Logistic Regression. Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118548387
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jelassi, T., Kersten, G. and Zionts, S. (1990) An Introduction to Group Decision and Negotiation Support. In: C. A. Bana e Costa, ed., Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid. Springer, 537-568.10.1007/978-3-642-75935-2_23
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kersten, G. E. (2003) The Science and Engineering of E-Negotiation: An Introduction. HICSS, 3, 27–1.10.1109/HICSS.2003.1173679
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kersten, G. E. and Cray, D. (1996) Perspectives on representation and analysis of negotiation: Towards cognitive support systems. Group Decision and Negotiation, 5(4), 433–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02404644
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kersten, G. E. and Lai, H. (2007) Negotiation Support and E-negotiation Systems: An Overview. Group Decision and Negotiation, 16(6), 553–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-007-9095-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kersten, G. E. and Noronha, S. J. (1999) WWW-based negotiation support: Design, implementation, and use. Decision Support Systems, 25(2), 135–154.10.1016/S0167-9236(99)00012-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kersten, G. E., Roszkowska, E. and Wachowicz, T. (2018) Representative Decision-Making and the Propensity to Use Round and Sharp Numbers in Preference Specification. In: Y. Chen, G. E. Kersten, R. Vetschera and H. Xu, eds., Group Decision and Negotiation in an Uncertain World. GDN 2018, Springer, 315, 43–55.10.1007/978-3-319-92874-6_4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kersten, G., Roszkowska, E. and Wachowicz, T. (2017) The Heuristics and Biases in Using the Negotiation Support Systems. In: M. Schoop and D. M. Kilgour, eds., Group Decision and Negotiation. A Socio-Technical Perspective. Springer International Publishing, 215-228 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63546-0_16
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leoneti, A. B. (2016) Considerations regarding the choice of ranking multiple criteria decision making methods. Pesquisa Operacional, 36(2), 259–277.10.1590/0101-7438.2016.036.02.0259
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mustajoki, J. and Hämäläinen, R. P. (2000)Web-Hipre: Global Decision Support By Value Tree And AHP Analysis. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 38(3), 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/03155986.2000.11732409
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Petrucci, C. J. (2009) A primer for social worker researchers on how to conduct a multinomial logistic regression. Journal of Social Service Research, 35(2), 193–205.10.1080/01488370802678983
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Power, D. J. (2008) Decision support systems: A historical overview. In: Handbook on Decision Support Systems 1. Springer, 121-140.10.1007/978-3-540-48713-5_7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roszkowska, E. and Wachowicz, T., eds. (2016) Negocjacje. Analiza i wspomaganie decyzji. Wolters Kluwer. https://www.legimi.pl/ebooknegocjacje-analiza-i-wspomaganie-decyzji-tomasz-wachowicz-ewaroszkowska,b149781.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saaty, T. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill.10.21236/ADA214804
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saaty, T. L. (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saaty, T. L. and Ergu, D. (2015) When is a decision-making method trustworthy? Criteria for evaluating multi-criteria decision-making methods. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 14(06), 1171–1187.10.1142/S021962201550025X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Savage, S. J. and Waldman, D. M. (2008) Learning and fatigue during choice experiments: A comparison of online and mail survey modes. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(3), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.984
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schoop, M., Jertila, A. and List, T. (2003) Negoisst: A negotiation support system for electronic business-to-business negotiations in e-commerce. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 47(3), 371–401.10.1016/S0169-023X(03)00065-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scott, S. G. and Bruce, R. A. (1995) Decision-making style: The development and assessment of a new measure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(5), 818–831.10.1177/0013164495055005017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Strack, F. (1992) “Order Effects” in Survey Research: Activation and Information Functions of Preceding Questions. In: N. Schwarz and S. Sudman, eds., Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research. Springer, 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2848-6_3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S. and Ullman, J. B. (2007) Using Multivariate Statistics 5. Pearson Boston, MA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tecle, A. (1988) Choice of multicriterion decision making techniques for watershed management. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Arizona.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thiessen, E. M. and Soberg, A. (2003) Smartsettle described with the montreal taxonomy. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12(2), 165.10.1023/A:1023025106197
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Toplak, M. E., West, R. F. and Stanovich, K. E. (2014) Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.844729
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turel, O. and Yuan, Y. (2007) User Acceptance ofWeb-Based Negotiation Support Systems: The Role of Perceived Intention of the Negotiating Partner to Negotiate Online. Group Decision and Negotiation, 16(5), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-006-9069-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wachowicz, T., Roszkowska, E. and Filipowicz-Chomko, M. (2018) What Impacts a Choice of Decision Support Method in Multiple Criteria Decision Making Problem? In: X.-j. Jiang, H.-y. Xu, Sh.-w. He and G. Y. Ke, eds., Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Group Decision and Negotiation. Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 275-279.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wachowicz, T., Kersten, G. E. and Roszkowska, E. (2019) How do I tell you what I want? Agent’s interpretation of principal’s preferences and its impact on understanding the negotiation process and outcomes. Operational Research, 19(4), 993–1032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-00448-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wachowicz, T. and Roszkowska, E. (2021) Holistic Preferences and Prenegotiation Preparation. In: D. M. Kilgour and C. Eden, eds., Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation (2nd ed.). Springer, Cham. 255–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12051-1_64-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wątróbski, J., Jankowski, J., Ziemba, P., Karczmarczyk, A. and Zioło, M. (2019) Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection. Omega, 86, 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.07.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yoon, K. and Hwang, C. L. (1981) Multiple Attribute Decision Making-Methods and Applications: A State-Of-The-Art Survey. Springer-Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yuan, Y., Head, M. and Du, M. (2003) The effects of multimedia communication on web-based negotiation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12, 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102301680437
]Search in Google Scholar