[
1. Handzhiyski, N., E. Somova. A Parsing Machine Architecture Encapsulating Different Parsing Approaches. – International Journal on Information Technologies and Security (IJITS), Vol. 13, 2021, No 3, pp. 27-38.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Unicode Standard. https://www.unicode.org/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Deremer, F. L. Practical Translators for LR(K) Languages. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, 1969.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Aho, A., J. Ullman. The Theory of Parsing, Translation, and Compiling. Prentice-Hall, USA, 1972.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Chomsky, N. Three Models for the Description of Language. – IRE Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. 2, 1956, No 3, pp. 113-124.10.1109/TIT.1956.1056813
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. D. Crocker, P. Overell, Eds. ABNF RFC 5234. Network Working Group, 2008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Wirth, N. What Can We Do About the Unnecessary Diversity of Notation for Syntactic Definitions? – Communications of the ACM, Vol. 20, 1977, No 11, pp. 822-823.10.1145/359863.359883
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. ISO/IEC 14977:1996(E) Information Technology – Syntactic Metalanguage – Extended BNF. http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Dos Reis, A. J. Compiler Construction Using Java, JavaCC, and Yacc. Wiley-IEEE Computer Society Pr, 2011.10.1002/9781118112762
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Moessenboeck, H. Coco/R – A Generator for Fast Compiler Front Ends. Zurich, ETH, 1990.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Aho, A. V., M. S. Lam, R. Sethi, J. D. Ullman. Compilers: Principles, Techniques, and Tools. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing, Co., USA, 2006.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Szafron, D., R. Ng. LexAGen: An Interactive Incremental Scanner Generator. – Software: Practice and Experience, Vol. 20, 1990, No 5, pp. 459-483.10.1002/spe.4380200503
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Rabin, M. O., D. S. Scott. Finite Automata and Their Decision Problems. – IBM Journal of Research and Development, Vol. 3, 1959, No 2, pp. 114-125.10.1147/rd.32.0114
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Van Wyk, E. R., A. C. Schwerdfeger. Context-Aware Scanning for Parsing Extensible Languages. – In: Proc. of 6th International Conference on Generative Programming and Component Engineering, October 2007, pp. 63-72.10.1145/1289971.1289983
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Aho, A. V., R. Sethi, J. D. Ullman. Compilers: Principles, Techniques, and Tools. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing, Co., USA, 1986.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Aycock, J., R. Horspool. Schrödinger’s Token. – Software: Practice and Experience, Vol. 31, 2001, No 8, pp. 803-814.10.1002/spe.390
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Johnson, S. C. YACC: Yet Another Compiler-Compiler. CiteSeer, 2001.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Saltzer, J. H. Traffic Control in a Multiplexed Computer System. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, 1966.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Barve, A., B. K. Joshi. Parallel Lexical Analysis of Multiple Files on Multi-Core Machines. – International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 96, 2014, No 16, pp. 22-24.10.5120/16879-6879
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Kleene, S. Representation of Events in Nerve Nets and Finite Automata. – Annals of Mathematics Studies, Vol. 34, 1956, pp. 3-41.10.1515/9781400882618-002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Rus, T., T. Halverson. A Language Independent Scanner Generator. CiteSeer, 1999, pp. 1-35.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. ANTLR. https://www.antlr.org/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. JavaCC. https://javacc.github.io/javacc
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Visser, E. Scannerless Generalized-LR Parsing. University of Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1997.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Afroozeh, A., A. Izmaylova. One Parser to Rule Them All. – In: ACM International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software (Onward!), October 2015, Chicago, USA, pp. 151-170.10.1145/2814228.2814242
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Van den Brand, M., J. Scheerder, J. Vinju, E. Visser. Disambiguation Filters for Scannerless Generalized LR Parsers. – In: Proc. of 11th International Conference of Compiler Construction, April 2002, pp. 1-17.10.1007/3-540-45937-5_12
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Turing, A. On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungs Problem. – In: Proc. of the London Mathematical Society. Vol. 41. 1937, pp. 230-265.10.1112/plms/s2-42.1.230
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Kleene, S. Representation of Events in Nerve Nets and Finite Automata. US Air Forse, USA, 1951.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Thompson, K. Programming Techniques: Regular Expression Search Algorithm. – Communications of the ACM, Vol. 11, 1968, No 6, pp. 419-422.10.1145/363347.363387
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Kühl, B., A.-T. Schreiner. Objects for Lexical Analysis. – ACM SIGPLAN Notices, Vol. 37, 2002, No 2, pp. 45-52.10.1145/568600.568610
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Saraiva, J. HaLeX: A Haskell Library to Model, Manipulate and Animate Regular Languages. – In: Proc. of ACM Workshop on Functional and Declarative Programming in Education (FDPE/PLI’02), October 2002.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Brzozowski, J. A. Canonical Regular Expressions and Minimal State Graphs for Definite Events. – In: Proc. of Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Automata, MRI Symposia Series. Vol. 12. 1963, pp. 529-561.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Revuz, D. Minimisation of Acyclic Deterministic Automata in Linear Time. – Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 92, 1992, No 1, pp. 181-189.10.1016/0304-3975(92)90142-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Berstel, J., L. Boasson, O. Carton, I. Fagnot. Minimization of Automata. – In: Automata: From Mathematics to Applications. European Mathematical Society, 2006.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Lesk, M., E. Schmidt. Lex – A Lexical Analyzer Generator. 1990.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Yang, W., C.-W. Tsay, J.-T. Chan. On the Applicability of the Longest-Match Rule in Lexical Analysis. – Computer Languages Systems & Structures, Vol. 28, 2002, No 3, pp. 273-288.10.1016/S0096-0551(02)00014-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Handzhiyski, N., E. Somova. Tunnel Parsing with Countable Repetitions. – Computer Science, Vol. 21, 2020, No 4, pp. 441-462.10.7494/csci.2020.21.4.3753
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Van Deursen, A., P. Klint, J. Visser. Domain-Specific Languages. – ACM SIGPLAN Notices, Vol. 35, 2000, No 6, pp. 26-36.10.1145/352029.352035
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Tunnel Grammar Studio. https://www.experasoft.com/products/tgs/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. T. Bray, Ed. The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), 2017.10.17487/RFC8259
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. T. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding, L. Masinter, Eds. Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax. Network Working Group, 2005.10.17487/rfc3986
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. P. Kyzivat, Ed. Case-Sensitive String Support in ABNF. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), 2014.10.17487/rfc7405
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Backus, J. W. The Syntax and Semantics of the Proposed International Algebraic Language of the Zurich ACM-GAMM Conference. – In: IFIP Congress, 1959, pp. 125-132.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Holub, A. Compiler Design in C. Prentice Hall, USA, 1990.
]Search in Google Scholar