[1. Aurues, T. The Fibonacci Sequence in Nature Implies Thermodynamic Maximum Entropy (New Developments of Generalized Entropies by Functional Analysis). 2013, 13.12.2017. https://repository.kulib.kyoto-u.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2433/195148/1/1852-18.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Baluška, F. Recent Surprising Similarities between Plant Cells and Neurons. – Plant Signalling & Behaviour, Vol. 5, 2010, No 2, pp. 87-89.10.4161/psb.5.2.11237288410520150757]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Barsalou, L. W. Situated Simulation in the Human Conceptual System. – Language and Cognitive Processes, Vol. 18, 2003, No 516, pp. 513-562.10.1080/01690960344000026]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Barsalou, L. W. Cognitively Plausible Theories of Concept Composition. – In: Y. Winter, J. A. Hampton, Eds. Compositionality and Concepts in Linguistics and Psychology. London, Springer Publishing, 2017, pp. 9-30.10.1007/978-3-319-45977-6_2]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Barsalou, L. W. What Does Semantic Tiling of the Cortex Tell Us About Semantics? – In: Neuropsychologia, Vol. 105, 2017, pp. 18-38.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.04.01128396096]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Boman, B. M., et al. Why Do Fibonacci Numbers Appear in Patterns of Growth in Nature? – The Fibonacci Quarterly, Vol. 55, 2017, No 5, pp. 30-41.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Bowling, D. L., M. Hoeschele, K. Z. Gill, W. T. Fitch. The Nature and Nurture of Musical Consonance. – Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Vol. 35, 2017, No 1, pp. 118-121.10.1525/mp.2017.35.1.118]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Chomsky, N. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1995.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Conn, A., et al. A Statistical Description of Plant Shoot Architecture. – Current Biology, Vol. 27, 2017, No 14, pp. 2078-2088.10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.009613089328690115]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Davis, G. B., M. Olson. Management Information Systems: Conceptual Foundations, Methods and Development. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1985.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Dehghani, M., et al. Decoding the Neural Representation of Story Meanings across Languages. 2017. Preprint DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/QRPP3.10.31234/osf.io/qrpp3]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Doron, M. et al. Timed Synaptic Inhibition Shapes NMDA Spikes, Influencing Local Dendritic Processing and Global I/O Properties of Cortical Neurons. – Cell Reports, Vol. 21, 2017, No 6, pp. 1550-1561.10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.03529117560]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Elliott, M. A., J. Kelly, J. Friedel, J. Brodsky, P. Mulcahy. The Golden Section as Optical Limitation. – PloS One, Vol. 10, 2015, No 7, e0131045.10.1371/journal.pone.0131045449592326154761]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Eriksson, J. E., et al. Neurocognitive Architecture of Working Memory. – Neuron, Vol. 88, 2015, No 1, pp. 33-46.10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.020460554526447571]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Dreyer, F. R., F. Pulvermüller. Abstract Semantics in the Motor System? – An Event-Related fMRI Study on Passive Reading of Semantic Word Categories Carrying Abstract Emotional and Mental Meaning. – Cortex, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.10.02110.1016/j.cortex.2017.10.02129455946]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[16. Gardiner, J., J. Marc. Arabidopsis Thaliana, a Plant Model Organism for the Neuronal Microtubule Cytoskeleton? – Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 62, 2010, No 1, pp. 89-97.10.1093/jxb/erq27820813785]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Goldin-Meadow, S., C. Yang. Statistical Evidence That a Child Can Create a Combinatorial Linguistic System without External Linguistic Input: Implications for language Evolution. – Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. Corrected Proof 12.2017 (in Press). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014976341630110510.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.016549137228041786]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Horibe, Y. An Entropy View of Fibonacci Trees. – The Fibonacci Quarterly, Vol. 20, 1982, No 2, pp. 168-178.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Horibe, Y. Notes on Fibonacci Trees and Their Optimality. – The Fibonacci Quarterly, Vol. 21, 1983, No 2, pp. 118-128.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Huth, A. G., S. Nishimoto, A. T. Vu, J. L. Gallant. A Continuous Semantic Space Describes the Representation of Thousands of Object and Action Categories Across the Human Brain. – Neuron, Vol. 76, 2012, No 6, pp. 1210-1224.10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.014355648823259955]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Huth, A. G., W. A. de Heer, T. vL. Griffiths, F. E. Theunissen, J. L. Gallant. Natural Speech Reveals the Semantic Maps that Tile Human Cerebral Cortex. – Nature, Vol. 532, 2016, No 7600, pp. 453-458.10.1038/nature17637485230927121839]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Kim, K., M. K. Johnson. Activity in Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex during Self-Related Processing: Positive Subjective Value or Personal Significance? – Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Vol. 10, 2014, No 4, pp. 494-500.10.1093/scan/nsu078438123324837477]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Liuzzi, A. G., et al. Cross-Modal Representation of Spoken and Written Word Meaning in Left Pars Triangularis. – NeuroImage, Vol. 150, 2017, pp. 292-307.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.03228213115]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Llinás, R. R. Intrinsic Electrical Properties of Mammalian Neurons and CNS Function: A Historical Perspective. – Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, Vol. 8, 2014.10.3389/fncel.2014.00320421945825408634]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Llinás, R. R., et al. Reconstruction of Human Brain Spontaneous Activity Based on Frequency-Pattern Analysis of Magnetoencephalography Data. – Frontiers in Neuroscience, Vol. 9, 2015, No 373, pp. 1-8.10.3389/fnins.2015.00373460836326528119]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Mao, X., Y. Wang, Y. Wu, C. Guo. Self-Referential Information Alleviates Retrieval Inhibition of Directed Forgetting Effects – An ERP Evidence of Source Memory. – Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, Vol. 11, 2017, No 187.10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00187564130829066962]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Just, M. A, J. Wang, V. Cherkassky. Neural Representations of the Concepts in Simple Sentences: Concept Activation Prediction and Context Effects. – NeuroImage, Vol. 157, 2017, No 15, pp. 511-520.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.033560084428629977]Search in Google Scholar
[28. McDermott, J. H., A. F. Schultz, E. A. Undurraga, R. A. Godoy. Indifference to Dissonance in Native Amazonians Reveals Cultural Variation in Music Perception. – Nature, Vol. 535, 2016, No 7613, pp. 547-550.10.1038/nature1863527409816]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Moran, P., J. Tommerdahl. A Case Study of Linguistic Isolation and Questions about Subsequent Language Support and Educational Provision in the United Kingdom. – In: The Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States, LACUS Forum 36: Mechanisms of Linguistic Behavior, 2011, pp. 229-240.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Morin, A., J. Michaud. Self-Awareness and the Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus: Inner Speech Use during Self-Related Processing. – Brain Research Bulletin, Vol. 74, 2007, No 6, pp. 387-396.10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.06.01317920447]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Nakagawa, Y. The Golden Ratios Which Imply Maximum Entropy in Nuclear Physics. Japan Fibonacci Association, 2017 (Accessed 15.12.2017). http://www.zg.em-net.ne.jp/~aurues/triage/room1/MagicNumbers20170926.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Northoff, G. From Emotions to Consciousness–A Neuro-Phenomenal and Neuro-Relational Approach. – Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 3, 2012.10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00303343161222969736]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Northoff, G., F. Bermpohl. Cortical Midline Structures and the Self. – Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 8, 2004, No 3, pp. 102-107.10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.00415301749]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Pendl, S. L., et al. Emergence of a Hierarchical Brain during Infancy Reflected by Stepwise Functional Connectivity. – Human Brain Mapping, Vol. 38, 2017, No 5, pp. 2666-2682.10.1002/hbm.23552606464928263011]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Piattelli-Palmarini, M., G. Vitiello. Quantum Field Theory and the Linguistic Minimalist Program: A Remarkable Isomorphism. – Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 880, 2017, No 1, pp. 12-16. IOP Publishing.10.1088/1742-6596/880/1/012016]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Pinker, S. The Bootstrapping Problem in Language Acquisition. – In: B. MacWhinney, Ed. Mechanisms of language Acquisition, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1987, pp. 399-441.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Ploux, S., et al. Structural Stability of Lexical Semantic Spaces: Nouns in Chinese and French. – arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.04173, 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Seth, A. K. Interoceptive Inference, Emotion, and the Embodied Self. – Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 17, 2013, No 11, pp. 565-573.10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.00724126130]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Shabalkin, I. P., E. Yu Grigor’eva, M. V. Gudkova, P. I. Shabalkin. Fibonacci Sequence and Supramolecular Structure of DNA. – Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, Vol. 161, 2016, No 1, pp. 193-196.10.1007/s10517-016-3374-627265133]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Slavova, V. Data Collection for Studying Language Acquisition. – In: Proc. of 12th International Conference on Computer Science and Education in C. Sc., 2016, pp. 105-113.]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Slavova, V. On Native Semantic Roles – Comparative Study Based on Data from Child Language-Acquisition of English and French. – International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), Vol. 5, 2017, No 2, pp. 1-18.10.5937/ijcrsee1702001S]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Slavova, V., K. Atanasov, A Generalized Net for Modeling Working Memory and Language Processing. – In: Proc. of the 7th International Conference Cognitive Modeling in linguistics, V. Text Processing and Cognitive Technologies, No 9, 2004, pp. 90-101.]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Slavova, V., A. Soschen. A Fibonacci-Tree Model of Cognitive Processes Underlying Language Faculty. – In: Proc. of 3rd International Conference in Computer Science, NBU, University of Fulda, Boston University, 2007, pp. 196-205.]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Slavova, V., A. Soschen. Experimental Support of Syntactic Computation Based on Semantic Merge of Concepts. – International Journal Information Theories & Applications, International Journal Information Technologies & Knowledge, Vol. 3, 2009, pp. 5-23.]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Slavova, V., A. Soschen. On Mental Representations: Language Structure and Meaning Revised. – International Journal of Information Theories & Applications, Vol. 2, 2015, No 4, pp. 316-325.]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Slavova, V., A. Soschen. Syntactic Operations – Modelling Language Faculty, International Journal of Information Theories & Applications, Vol. 2, 2015, No 4, pp. 326-337.]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Smith, S. L., I. Smith, T. Branco, M. Häusser. Dendritic Spikes Enhance Stimulus Selectivity in Cortical Neurons in Vivo. – Nature, Vol. 503, 2013, No 7474, pp. 115-120.10.1038/nature12600631960624162850]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Tardif, T. Nouns Are Not Always Learned Before Verbs: Evidence from Mandarin Speakers Early Vocabularies. – Developmental Psychology, Vol. 32, 1996, No 3, p. 492.10.1037/0012-1649.32.3.492]Search in Google Scholar
[49. van Gend, R. The Fibonacci Sequence and the Golden Ratio in Music. – Notes on Number Theory and Discrete Mathematics, Vol. 20, 2014, No 1, pp. 72-77.]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Velmans, M. When Perception Becomes Conscious. – British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 90, 1999, No 4, pp. 543-566.10.1348/000712699161620]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Virtala, P., M. Huotilainen, E Partanen, V. Fellman, M. Tervaniemi. Newborn Infants’ Auditory System is Sensitive to Western Music Chord Categories. – Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 4, 2013.10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00492373598023966962]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Wang, J., V. Cerkassky, M. A. Just. Predicting the Brain Activation Pattern Associated with the Propositional Content of a Sentence: Modeling Neural Representations of Events and States. – Human Brain Mapping, Vol. 38, 2017, No 10, pp. 4865-4881.10.1002/hbm.23692686714428653794]Search in Google Scholar
[53. Wille, J. J. Occurrence of Fibonacci Numbers in Development and Structure of Animal Forms: Phylogenetic Observations and Epigenetic Significance. – Natural Science, Vol. 4, 2012, No 4, p. 216.10.4236/ns.2012.44033]Search in Google Scholar
[54. Woldenberg, M. J., M. P. O’Neill, L. J. Quackenbush, R. J. Pentney. Models for Growth, Decline and Regrowth of the Dendrites of Rat Purkinje Cells Induced from Magnitude and Link-Length Analysis. – Journal of Theoretical Biology, Vol. 162, 1993, No 4, pp. 403-429.10.1006/jtbi.1993.10978412232]Search in Google Scholar
[55. Yang, Y., et al. Commonalities and Differences in the Neural Representations of English, Portuguese, and Mandarin Sentences: When Knowledge of the Brain-Language Mappings for Two Languages is Better than One. – Brain and Language, Vol. 175, 2017, pp. 77-85.10.1016/j.bandl.2017.09.00729045921]Search in Google Scholar
[56. CHILDES – The Child Language Component of the TalkBank – System for Sharing and Studying Conversational Interactions. Online Resource. http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/]Search in Google Scholar