A Fuzzy Approach for Bidding Strategy Selection

1. Angelova, V. Investigations in the Area of Soft Computing. Targeted State of the Art Report. - Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 9, 2009, No 1, 18-24.Search in Google Scholar

2. Cliff, D., J. Brut en. Zero is Not Enough: On the Lower Limit of Agent Intelligence for Continuous Double Auction Markets. Technical Report HP-97-155. Hewlett-Packard Research Laboratories, Bristol, England, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

3. Gode, D. K., S. Sunder. Allocative e_Ciency of Markets with Zero-Intelligence Traders: Market as a Partial Substitute for Individual Rationality. - The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 101, 1993, No 1, 119-137.10.1086/261868Search in Google Scholar

4. Goyal, M., Jie Lu, G. Zhang. Decision Making in Multi-Issue e-Market Auction Using Fuzzy Techniques and Negotiable Attitudes. - Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 3, 2008, No 2, 97-11.10.4067/S0718-18762008000100009Search in Google Scholar

5. Faratin, P., C. Sierra, N. R. Jennings. Negotiation Decision Functions for Autonomous Agents. - International Journal of Robotics and Autonomous System, Vol. 24, 1998, No 3-4, 159-182.10.1016/S0921-8890(98)00029-3Search in Google Scholar

6. Ilieva, G. An e-Market System Supporting Simultaneous Auctions with Intelligent Agents. - In: Proc. of the Young Researchers' Session of the IEEE 2006 John Vincent Atanasoff International Symposium on Modern Computing, Sofia, 2006, 41-47.Search in Google Scholar

7. Jank, W., G. Shmueli, S. Wang. Dynamic, Real-Time Forecasting of Online Auction via Functional Models. - In: Proc. of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2006), Philadephia, 580-585.10.1145/1150402.1150471Search in Google Scholar

8. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Aggregation of Fuzzy Numbers in a Decision Making Situation. - Cybernetics and Systems, Vol. 32, 2001, No 8, 821-835.10.1080/019697201753229845Search in Google Scholar

9. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Models for Decision Making by Fuzzy Relations and Fuzzy Numbers for Criteria Evaluations. - Compt. Rend. Acad. Bulg. Sci., Vol. 62, 2009, No 10, 1217-1222.Search in Google Scholar

10. Peneva, V., I. Popchev. Multicriteria Decision Making by Fuzzy Relations and Weighting Functions for the Criteria. - Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 9, 2009, No 4, 58-71.Search in Google Scholar

11. Peneva, V.,I.Popchev. Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Algorithms. - Compt. Rend. Acad. Bulg. Sci., Vol. 63, 2010, No 7, 979-992.Search in Google Scholar

12. Radeva, I. Strategic Integration with MAP-CLUSTER Software System. - Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 10, 2010, No 2, 78-93.Search in Google Scholar

13. Vytelingum, P., R. K. Dash, E. David, N. R. Jennings. A Risk-Based Bidding Strategy for Continuous Double Auctions. - In: Proc. of the 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2004, Spain, 79-83.Search in Google Scholar

14. Walsh, W. E., R. Das, G. Tesauro, J. O. Kephart. Analyzing Complex Strategic Interactions in Multi-Agent Games. - In: Proc. of AAAI Workshop on Game-Theoretic and Decision-Theoretic Agents, Edmonton, Canada, 2002.Search in Google Scholar