[
1. Aguinis, H., Glavas, A. (2012), “What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda”, Journal of Management, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 932–968.10.1177/0149206311436079
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., Zhou, J. (2014), “Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework”, Journal of Management, Vol. 40 No. 5, pp. 1297-1333.10.1177/0149206314527128
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Andriof, J., Waddock, S. (2002), “Unfolding stakeholder Engagement”, in Sutherland Rahman, S., Waddock, S., Andriof, J., Husted, B. (Ed.), Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking, Greenleaf, London, UK.10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2002.su.00004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Atli, D., Vidovic, M., Omazic, M. A. (2018), “Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility on the Web: A Content Analysis of Sustainability Reports in World’s Best Multinational Workplaces”, International Journal of Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Corporate Social Responsibility, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 1-17.10.4018/IJSECSR.2018070101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Augier, M., Teece, D. J. (2009), “Dynamic Capabilities and the Role of Managers in Business Strategy and Economic Performance”, Organization Science, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 410-421.10.1287/orsc.1090.0424
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Barraket, J., Keast, R., Furneaux, C. (2016), Social procurement and new public governance, Routledge, London.10.4324/9780203797532
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Barthorpe, S. (2010), “Implementing corporate social responsibility in the UK construction industry”, Property Management, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 4-17.10.1108/02637471011017145
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Bondy, K. (2008), “The paradox of power in CSR: A case study on implementation”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 82 No. 2, pp. 307-323.10.1007/s10551-008-9889-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Borg, I., Groenen, P. J. F. (2005), Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications, 2nd Ed., Springer, New York, USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Buallay, A. (2019), “Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector”, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 98-115.10.1108/MEQ-12-2017-0149
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Carroll, A. B. (1991), “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders”, Business Horizons, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 39–48.10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Choi, J., Wang, H. (2009), “Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 30 No. 8, pp. 895-907.10.1002/smj.759
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Dyer, J.H., Singh, H. (1998), “The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 660-679.10.5465/amr.1998.1255632
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Edum-Fotwe, F. T., McCaffer, R. (2000), “Developing project management competency: perspectives from the construction industry”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 111-124.10.1016/S0263-7863(98)90075-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. EU (2014), “Directive 2014/95/EU” available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0095&from=EN (18 June 2020).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. European Construction Industry Federation (2019), “Key figures activity in 2018”, FIEC
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Hamel, G., Zanini, M. (2014), “Build a change platform, not a change program”, Mckinsey & Company, available at http://www.mckinsey.com/Insights/Organization, (11 November 2014).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Harrison, J. S., St. John, C. H. (1996), “Managing and Partnering with External Stakeholders”, The Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 46-60.10.5465/ame.1996.9606161554
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Hillenbrand, C., Money, K. (2007), “Corporate Responsibility and Corporate Reputation: Two Separate Concepts or Two Sides of the Same Coin?”, Corporate Reputation Review, Vol. 10, pp. 261–277.10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550057
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Huxham, C. (2003), “Theorizing Collaboration Practice, Public Management Review, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 401-423.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Huxham, C., Macdonald, D. (1992), “Introducing collaborative advantage: Achieving interorganizational effectiveness through meta-strategy”, Management Decision, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 50–56.10.1108/00251749210013104
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. IBM (2020), “Multidimensional Unfolding (PREFSCAL), available at https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLVMB_25.0.0/statistics_mainhelp_ddita/spss/categories/idh_prfs.html /(18 June 2020).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Jiang, W., Wong, J. (2016), “Key activity areas of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the construction industry: A study of China”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 113, pp. 850-860.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.093
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Keys, T., Malnight, T. W., van der Graaf, K. (2009), “Making the most of corporate social responsibility”, McKinsey Quarterly, pp. 1-8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. King, B. G., Walker, E. T. (2014), “Winning Hearts and Minds: Field Theory and the Three Dimensions of Strategy”, Strategic Organization, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 134-141.10.1177/1476127014529758
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Liyanage, C., Ulutas¸ D. D., Giritli, H., McDermott, P. (2016), “Corporate social responsibility in construction industry: a comparative study between UK and Turkey”, Built Environment Project and Asset Management, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 218-231.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Mahon, J. F. (2002), “Corporate reputation: Research agenda using strategy and stakeholder literature”, Business and Society, Vol. 41 No. 4, pp. 415-445.10.1177/0007650302238776
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Makadok, R. (2003), “Doing the right thing and knowing the right thing to do: why the whole is greater than the sum of the parts”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24 No. 10, pp. 1043-1055.10.1002/smj.313
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. McKinsey Quarterly (2020a), “Purpose: Shifting from why to how”, April, 2020, available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/organization/our%20insights/purpose%20shifting%20from%20why%20to%20how/purpose-shifting-from-why-to-how-v3.pdf?shouldIndex=false (10 May 2021)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. McKinsey Quarterly (2020b), “The pivotal factor for effective external engagement”, May, 2020, available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/strategy%20and%20corporate%20finance/our%20insights/the%20pivotal%20factors%20for%20effective%20external%20engagement/the-pivotal-factors-for-effective-external-engagement.pdf?shouldIndex=false (10 May 2021)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., Wood, D. J. (1997), “Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 853–886.10.2307/259247
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Morsing, M., Schultz, M. (2006), “Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies”, Business Ethics: A European Review, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 323-338.10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Pettigrew A. M. (1987), “Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 24, pp. 649–670.10.1111/j.1467-6486.1987.tb00467.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Sev, A. (2009), “How can the construction industry contribute to sustainable development? A conceptual framework”, Sustainable Development, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 161-173.10.1002/sd.373
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Shen, L.-Y., Tam, V. W., Tam, L. Tam, Ji, Y.-B. (2010), “Project feasibility study: the key to successful implementation of sustainable and socially responsible construction management practice”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 254-259.10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Sminia, H., de Rond, M. (2012), “Context and Action in the Transformation of Strategy Scholarship”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 49 No. 7, pp. 1329–1349.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01059.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Stainer, A., Stainer, L. (1998), “Business Performance – a Stakeholder Approach”, International Journal of Business Performance Management, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 2-12.10.1504/IJBPM.1998.004042
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Staurer, R., Langer, M. E., Konrad, A., Martinuzzi, A. (2005), “Corporations, Stakeholders and Sustainable Development I: A Theoretical Exploration of Business-Society Relations”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 61, pp. 263-281.10.1007/s10551-005-7054-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., Waddock, S. (2010), “Corporate responsibility and financial performance: the role of intangible resources”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 31 No. 5, pp. 463-490.10.1002/smj.820
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Tam., V. W. Y., Shen, L. Y., Yau, R. M. Y., Tam, C. M. (2007), “Assessing the levels of material wastage affected by sub-contracting relationships and projects types with their correlations”, Building Environment, Vol. 42 No. 3, pp. 1471-1477.10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.12.023
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Teece, D. J. (2007), “Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28 No. 13, pp. 1319-1350.10.1002/smj.640
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Tipuric, D., Tomsic, D. (2016), “Collaborative strategies to heal the competitive paradigm shortcuts”, Tipuric, D., Kovac, I. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship: New Governance for Value Creation, Towards Stakeholding and Participation Zagreb: CIRU - Governance research and Development Centre, pp. 1247-1260.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Tomsic, D. (2013a), “The Role of Firm Reputation in Corporate Governance Processes”, Tipurić, D., Podrug, N. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1st International OFEL Conference on Corporate Governance, Zagreb: CIRU - Governance research and Development Centre, pp. 845-862.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Tomsic, D. (2013b), “Towards Relational View of Corporate Governance”, Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 71-87.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. United Nations Global Compact (2016), “Guide to Corporate Sustainability, Shaping a sustainable future”, available at https://d306pr3pise04h.cloudfront.net/docs/publications%2FUN_Global_Compact_Guide_to_Corporate_Sustainability.pdf (30 January 2020)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Vaara E., Durand, R. (2012), 2How to make strategy research connect with broader issues that matter?”, Strategic Organization, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 248-255.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. Vishwanathan, P., van Oosterhout, H. J., Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., Duran, P., van Essen, M. (2020), “Strategic CSR: A Concept Building Meta-Analysis”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 57 No. 2, pp. 314-350.10.1111/joms.12514
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Waddock, S. (2003), “Stakeholder performance implications of corporate responsibility”, International Journal of Performance Management, Vol. 5 No. 2/3, pp. 114–124.10.1504/IJBPM.2003.003262
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. Whittington, R. (2012), “Big Strategy/Small Strategy”, Strategic Organization, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 263-268.10.1177/1476127012452828
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. Wu, M., Eweje, G. (2008), “Stakeholder engagement as a facilitator of organizational learning”, Department of Management and International Business Research Working Paper Series 2008, no. 1. Auckland, NZ: Massey University
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. Xia, B., Olanipekun, A., Chen, Q., Xie, L., Liu, Y. (2018), “Conceptualising the state of the art of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the construction industry and its nexus to sustainable development”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 195, pp. 340-353.10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.157
]Search in Google Scholar
