1. bookVolumen 5 (2014): Edición 2 (June 2014)
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
1847-9375
Primera edición
19 Sep 2012
Calendario de la edición
2 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés
Acceso abierto

Fostering Innovation in the National Systems: An Application to Spain

Publicado en línea: 10 Sep 2014
Volumen & Edición: Volumen 5 (2014) - Edición 2 (June 2014)
Páginas: 110 - 124
Recibido: 02 Oct 2013
Aceptado: 16 May 2014
Detalles de la revista
License
Formato
Revista
eISSN
1847-9375
Primera edición
19 Sep 2012
Calendario de la edición
2 veces al año
Idiomas
Inglés

1. Abramovitz, M., David, P. (1996), “Technological Change and the Rise of Intangible Investments: The US Economy’s Growth-path in the Twentieth Century”, in Foray, D., Lundvall, B. A. (eds), “Employment and Growth in the Knowledge-based Economy”, Paris: OECD.Search in Google Scholar

2. Alchian, A. A., Demsetz, H. (1972), “Production, information costs, and economic organization”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 62, No. 5, pp. 777-795.Search in Google Scholar

3. Al-Natour, S., Be n basat, I. (2009), “The Adoption and Use of IT Artifacts: A New Interaction Centric Model for the Study of User-Artifact Relationships”, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 10, No. 9, pp. 661-685.10.17705/1jais.00208Search in Google Scholar

4. Artopoulos, A. (2006), “Tenaris. Una corporación global desde el sur”, available at: https://www.udesa.edu.ar/files/UAAdministracion/Documentos%20de%20Trabajo/59.pdf (17 July 2014).Search in Google Scholar

5. Benkler, Y. (2002), “Coase’s Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firms”, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 112, No. 3, pp. 369-446.10.2307/1562247Search in Google Scholar

6. Benkler, Y. (2005), “La nueva economía del código abierto”, presentation at TED conference.Search in Google Scholar

7. Benkler, Y. (2006). “The Wealth of Networks. How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom”, New Haven, London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

8. Bermejo Ruiz, J. M. (2012), “De la investigación a la innovación: importancia de la gestión de la propiedad intelectual en el sistema científico tecnológico español para la promoción de entornos colaborativos”, doctoral dissertation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.Search in Google Scholar

9. Bermejo Ruiz, J. M., De Pablos Heredero, C. (2013), “An analysis of the Spanish Science and Technology system”, Procedia Technology, Vol. 9, pp. 511-517.10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.057Search in Google Scholar

10. Brown, S. L., Eisenhardt, K. M. (1998). „Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos”, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.10.1016/S0024-6301(98)00092-2Search in Google Scholar

11. Castro, G. M. et al. (2009), “El capital relacional como fuente de innovación tecnológica”, Innovar. Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociale, Vol. 19, No. 35, pp. 119-132.Search in Google Scholar

12. Chung, S. A., Singh, H., Lee, K. (2000), “Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 1-22.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200001)21:1<1::AID-SMJ63>3.0.CO;2-PSearch in Google Scholar

13. Colás, B. P., De Pablos, P. J. (2004), “La formación del profesorado basada en redes de aprendizaje virtual: aplicación de la técnica dafo”, available at: http://campus.usal.es/~teoriaeducacion/rev_numero_05/n5_art_colas_pablos.ht ml/ (23 March 2011).Search in Google Scholar

14. Conner, K. R., Prahalad, C. K. (1996), “A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge versus Opportunism”, Organization Science, Vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 477-501.10.1287/orsc.7.5.477Search in Google Scholar

15. Cooke, P. (2005), “Regionally Asymetric Knowledge Capabilities and Open Innovation”, Research Policy, Vol. 34, No. 8, pp. 1128-1149.10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.005Search in Google Scholar

16. D’Aveni, R. (1994). “Hypercompetiton: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering”, New York: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

17. Day, G. (1994), “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp. 37-52.10.1177/002224299405800404Search in Google Scholar

18. De Pablos Heredero, C. et al. (2012). “Organization and transformation of information systems at firms”, Madrid: ESIC.Search in Google Scholar

19. Dedrick, J., West, J. (2005), “Why firms adopt Open Source Platforms: A grounded Theory of Innovation and Standards Adoption”, available at: http://www.joelwest.org/misq-stds/proceedings/145_236-257.pdf (17 July 2014).Search in Google Scholar

20. Douglas, D. (2003), “Grounded Theory and the “And” in Entrepreneurship Research”, Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 47–170.Search in Google Scholar

21. Douglas, D. (2009), “Entrepreneurship Research and Grounded Theory. Some Methodological Reflections”, available at: https://www.staffs.ac.uk/assets/2009%20David%20Douglas,%20’Entrepreneurship%20Research%20and%20Grounded%20Theory_tcm44-21760.pdf (17 July 2014).Search in Google Scholar

22. Doz, Y. L., Olk, P. M., Ring, P. S. (2000), “Formation process of R&D consortia: which path to take? Where does it lead?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 239-266.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<239::AID-SMJ97>3.0.CO;2-KSearch in Google Scholar

23. Drucker, P. F. (1994). “Post-Capitalist Society”, New York: Harper Business.Search in Google Scholar

24. EIRMA (2009), “Responsible Partnering. Joining Forces in a World of Open Innovation: Guidelines for Collaborative Research and Knowledge Transfer between Science and Industry”. European Industrial Research Management Association Protocol. The Netherlands.Search in Google Scholar

25. Eisenhardt, K. M., Martin, J. A. (2000), “Dynamic capabilities: what are they?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 10-11, pp. 1105-1121.10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-ESearch in Google Scholar

26. Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (2000), “The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and Mode 2 to a Triple Helix of university industry-government relations”, Research Policy, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 109-123.10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4Search in Google Scholar

27. Fleming, L., Sorenson, O. (2004), “Science as a map in technological search”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 25, No. 8-9, pp. 909-928.10.1002/smj.384Search in Google Scholar

28. Galán, J. L., Casanueva, C., Castro-Abancéns, I. (2010), “Las relaciones empresariales: una tipología de redes”, Innovar. Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales, Vol. 20, No. 38, pp. 27-44.Search in Google Scholar

29. Gittell, J. H. (2009). “High Performance Healthcare: Using the Power of Relationships to Achieve Quality, Efficiency and Resilience”, New York: Mc Graw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

30. Glaser, B. G. (1992). “Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emerge vs. Forcing”, Mill Valley: Sociology Press.Search in Google Scholar

31. Glaser, G., Strauss, A. (1967). “The discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research”, New York: Aldine Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

32. Goldkuhl, G. (2004). “Conceptual determination when developing a multi-grounded theory. Example and Defining ISD method”, European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management, Reading University, UK.Search in Google Scholar

33. Gonzalez-Barahona, J. M. et al. (2001), “Counting Potatoes: the Size of Debian 2.2”, Upgrade, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 60-66.Search in Google Scholar

34. Hagedroon, J. (1993), “Understanding the Rationale of Strategic Technology Partnering: Interorganizational Modes of Cooperation and Sectoral Differences”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 371-385.10.1002/smj.4250140505Search in Google Scholar

35. Haider, S., De Pablos Heredero, C. (2012), “Determinants of R&D Cooperation: an Institutional Perspective”, Revista de Economía Mundial, No. 32, pp. 239-257.Search in Google Scholar

36. Hamel, G., Prahalad, C. K. (1993), “Strategy as Stretch and Leverage”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 75-84.Search in Google Scholar

37. Hamel, G., Prahalad. C. K. (1994). “Competing for the Future”, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Search in Google Scholar

38. Hunt, S. D. (1999). “A general theory of competition”, Thousands Oaks: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

39. International Monetary Fund (1997), “Perspectivas de la economía mundial”, Washington, p. 59.Search in Google Scholar

40. Jensen, M. C., Meckling, W. H. (1976), “A theory of the firm: Governance, Residual Claims and Organizational Forms”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 305-360.10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-XSearch in Google Scholar

41. Krüger, K. (2006), “El concepto de la Sociedad del Conocimiento”, available at: http://www.ub.es/geocrit/b3w-683.htm (25th April 2012).Search in Google Scholar

42. Larn, A. (2000), “Tacit Knowledge, Organizational Learning and Societal Institutions: An Integrated Framework”, Organization Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 487-513.10.1177/0170840600213001Search in Google Scholar

43. Locke, K. (2001). “Grounded Theory in Management Research”, London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

44. Lowe, A. (1995), “The basic social processes of entrepreneurial innovation”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 54-76.10.1108/13552559510090622Search in Google Scholar

45. Lundvall, B. (ed.) (1992). “National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning”, London: Printer Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

46. Malerba, F. (2002), “Sectoral systems of innovation and production”, Research Policy, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 247-264.10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1Search in Google Scholar

47. Malerba, F. (ed.) (2004). “Sectoral Systems of Innovation. Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511493270Search in Google Scholar

48. McCormack, A. et al. (2007). “Innovation through Global Collaboration: A New Source of Competitive Advantage”, available at: http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/07-079.pdf (17 July 2014).Search in Google Scholar

49. Mohrman, S. A., Galbraith, J. R., Lawler E. E. (1998), “The Challenge of Change. In Tomorrow’s Organization: Crafting Winning Capabilities in a Dynamic World”, San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.Search in Google Scholar

50. Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., Anderson-Cook, C. M. (2009).” Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments (Vol. 705)”, London: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

51. Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G. (1985). “An evolutionary theory of economic change”, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

52. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. (1996), “A Theory of Organisational Knowledge Creation”, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 11, No. 7-8, pp. 833-845.Search in Google Scholar

53. Orlikowski, W. J. (1993), “CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incre- mental and Radical Changes in Systems Development”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 309-340.10.2307/249774Search in Google Scholar

54. Orlikowski, W. J., Robey, D. (1991), “Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 143-169.10.1287/isre.2.2.143Search in Google Scholar

55. Partington, D. (2000), “Building grounded theories of management action”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 11, pp. 91-102.10.1111/1467-8551.00153Search in Google Scholar

56. Polanyi, M. (1966). “The Tacit Dimension”, New York: Anchor Day.Search in Google Scholar

57. Powell, W. W., Snellman, K. (2004), “The Knowledge Economy”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 30, pp. 199-220.10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100037Search in Google Scholar

58. Prahalad, C., Hamel, G. (1990), “The Core Competence of the Corporation”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 79-91.Search in Google Scholar

59. Quintero-Campos, L. J. (2010), “Aportes teóricos para el estudio de un sistema de innovación”, Innovar, Vol. 20, No. 38, pp. 57-76.Search in Google Scholar

60. Senge, P. M. (1990). “La Quinta Disciplina: El Arte y la Práctica de la Organización Abierta al Aprendizaje”, Buenos Aires: Granica.Search in Google Scholar

61. Srivastava, R. K., Fahey, L., Christensen, H. K. (2001), “The resource-based view and marketing: The role of market-based assets in gaining competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol. 27. No. 6, pp. 777-802.10.1177/014920630102700610Search in Google Scholar

62. Strauss, A., Corbin, J. M. (1990). “Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded theory, procedures and techniques”, London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

63. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. (1994), “The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 537-556.10.1093/icc/3.3.537-aSearch in Google Scholar

64. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. (1997), “Dynamics Capabilities and Strategic Management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 509-533.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-ZSearch in Google Scholar

65. Tidd, J. (2000), “The competence cycle: translating knowledge into new processes, products and services - Chapter 1”, in Tidd, J. (ed.), “From Knowledge management to strategic competencies: measures of technological, market & organizational innovation”, London: Imperial College Press.10.1142/9781860943058_0001Search in Google Scholar

66. Tognato, C. (2007), “Construir zonas de intercambio entre la academia y el mercado: una aproximación desde la pragmática cultural”, Innovar. Revista de Ciencias Administrativas y Sociales, Vol. 17, No. 30, pp. 7-17.Search in Google Scholar

67. Venkatesh, V. et al. (2003), “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 425-478.10.2307/30036540Search in Google Scholar

68. Werger, G. (2003), “Evolutionary markets and the design of institutional policy”, in Pelikan, P., Werger, G. (eds), “The Evolutionary Analysis of Economic Policy”, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Search in Google Scholar

69. Wheeler, D. (2007), “Why Open Source Software. Look at the Numbers”, available at: http://www.dwheeler.com/oss_fs_why.html (30 Jan 2010).Search in Google Scholar

70. Williamson, O. E. (1975). “Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications”, New York: Pinter.Search in Google Scholar

71. Williamson, O. E. (1996). “The mechanisms of governance”, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

72. Zollo, M., Winter, S. G. (2002), “Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities”, Organization Science, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 339-351.10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780Search in Google Scholar

Artículos recomendados de Trend MD

Planifique su conferencia remota con Sciendo