[1. Barron, N. Emanuel. Game Theory: An Introduction. 2nd ed., New Jersey: Wiley, 2013.10.1002/9781118547168]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Biard, G. Douglas, Robert H. Gertner, and Randal C. Picker. Game Theory and the Law. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1994.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Boin, Arjen, Allan McConnell, and Paul t’Hart. “Crisis exploitation: political and policy impacts of framing contests.” Journal of European Public Policy 16:1 (2009): 81–106.10.1080/13501760802453221]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Bovens, Mark, and Paul t’Hart. “Revisiting the study of policy failures.” Journal of European Public Policy 23:5 (2016): 653–666.10.1080/13501763.2015.1127273]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Coase, A. Ronald. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica 4:16 (1937): 386–405.10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Dixit, Avinash, and Barry Nalebuff. Thinking Strategically: The Competitive Edge in Business, Politics and Everyday Life. New York: Norton, 1991.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Downs, Anthony. Inside Bureaucracy. New York: Little, Brown and Company, 1967.10.7249/CB156]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Dunleavy, Patrick. Bureaucracy and Public Choice: Economic Explanation in Political Science. London: Harvester, Wheatsheaf, 1991.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Faure, Michael, and Johnston S. Jason. “The Law and Economics of Environmental Federalism: Europe and the United States Compared.” Virginia Environmental Law Journal 27:3 (2009): 205–274.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Faure, Michael. “Harmonisation of Environmental Law and Market Integration: Harmonising for the Wrong Reasons?” European Environmental Law Review 7:6 (1998): 169–175.10.54648/EELR1998027]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Grant, Wyn. Pressure Groups, Politics and Democracy in Britain. London: Philip Allan, 1989.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Henderson, Ailsa, Charlie Jeffery, Daniel Wincott, and Richard Jones Wyn. “How Brexit was made in England.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19:4 (2017): 631–646.10.1177/1369148117730542]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Hix, Simon. “Brexit: Where is the EU–UK Relationship Heading?” Journal of Common Market Studies 56:4 (2018): 11–27.10.1111/jcms.12766]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Hopkin, Jonathan. “When Polanyi met Farage: Market Fundamentalism, Economic Nationalism, and Britain’s Exit from the European Union.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19:3 (2017): 465–478.10.1177/1369148117710894]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Inman, P. Robert, and Daniel L. Rubinfeld. “Economics of Federalism”: 84–106. In: Francesco Parisi, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Law and Economics, Volume 3: Public Law and Legal Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Inman, P. Robert, and Daniel L. Rubinfeld. “Rethinking Federalism.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11:4 (1997a): 43–64.10.1257/jep.11.4.43]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Inman, P. Robert, and Daniel L. Rubinfeld. “The Political Economy of Federalism”: 73–105. In: Dennis C. Mueller, ed. Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997b.10.1017/CBO9780511664458.005]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Jackson, Howell, Louis Kaplow, Steven Shavell, Kip Viscusi, and Daniel Cope. Analytical Methods for Lawyers. 2nd ed. New York: Foundation Press, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Klick, Johnatan. The Law and Economics of Federalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017.10.4337/9781786433602]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Leitzel, Jim. Concepts in Law and Economics: A Guide for the Curious. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190213978.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Magen, Stefan. “Game theory and collective goods”: 61–96. In Emanuel V. Towfigh and Niels Petersen, eds. Economic Methods for Lawyers. Cambridge: Edward Elgar, 2015.10.4337/9781783471676.00009]Search in Google Scholar
[22. McCarty, Nolan. Political Game Theory: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. McLean, Iain. Public Choice – An Introduction. 1st ed. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell, 1991.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Miles, Lee and Redmond John. “Enlarging the European Union: The Erosion of Federalism?” Cooperation and Conflict 3:31 (1996): 285–309.10.1177/0010836796031003002]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Mueller, C. Dennis. Public Choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Niskanen, A. William. Bureaucracy and Public Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1994.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Niskanen, A. William. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine, 1971.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Noam, Eli. “The Choice of Governmental Level in Regulation.” Kyklos 35:2 (1982): 278–291.10.1111/j.1467-6435.1982.tb00167.x]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Oates, E. Wallace. “An Essay on Fiscal Federalism.” Journal of Economic Literature 37:1 (1999): 1120–1149.10.1257/jel.37.3.1120]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Oates, E. Wallace. Fiscal federalism. London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Ogus, Anthony. “Competition between National Legal Systems: A Contribution of Economic Analysis to Comparative Law.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 48:2 (1999): 405–418.10.1017/S0020589300063259]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Ogus, Anthony. Cost and Cautionary Tales: Economic Insights for the Law. Folly Bridge: Hart Publishing, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Ogus, Athony. Regulation: Legal Form and Economic Theory. Cambridge: Hart Publishing, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1965.]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Oppermann, Kai and Alexander Spencer. “Fiascos in Public Policy and Foreign Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 23:5 (2016): 643–652.10.1080/13501763.2015.1128228]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Pelkmans, Jacques. “The Assignment of Public Functions in Economics Integration.” Journal of Common Market Studies 21:2 (1982): 97–121.10.1111/j.1468-5965.1982.tb00864.x]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Pochet, Philippe, and Christophe Degryse. “Monetary union and the stakes for democracy and social policy.” European Review of Labour and Research 19:1 (2013): 103–116.10.1177/1024258912469915]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Posner, Richard A. Economic Analysis of Law. 8th ed. Wolters Kluwer International, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Rasmusen. Eric. Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory. 4th ed., Victoria: Blackwell Publishing, 2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Richardson, Jeremy. “Brexit: The EU Policy-Making State Hits the Populist Buffers.” Political Quarterly 89:1 (2018): 118–126.10.1111/1467-923X.12453]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Sampson, Thomas. “Brexit: The Economics of International Disintegration.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 31:4 (2017): 163–184.10.1257/jep.31.4.163]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Schecter, Stephen, and Herbert Gintis. Game Theory in Action: An Introduction to Classical and Evolutionary Models. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2016.10.1515/9781400880881]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Schelling, Thomas. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960.]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Tadelis, Steven. Game Theory: An Introduction. Princeton University Press, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Thompson, Helen. “Inevitability and Contingency: The Political Economy of Brexit.” British Journal of Politics and International relations 19:3 (2017): 434–449.10.1177/1369148117710431]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Tiebout, M. Charles. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy 64:5 (1956): 416–424.10.1086/257839]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Towfigh, V. Emanuel, and Petersen Niels. “Public and Social Choice Theory”: 121–146. In: Emanuel V. Towfigh and Niels Petersen, eds. Economic Methods for Lawyers. Cambridge: Edward Elgar, 2015.10.4337/9781783471676.00011]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Van den Bergh, Roger. “Economic Criteria for Applying the Subsidiarity Principle in the European Community: The Case of Competition Policy.” International Review of Law and Economics 16:3 (1996): 363–383.10.1016/0144-8188(96)00022-1]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Van den Bergh, Roger. “Farewell Utopia? Why the European Union should take the Economics of Federalism Seriously.” Maastricht Journal of International and European Law 23:6 (2016): 937–964.10.1177/1023263X1602300603]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Van den Bergh, Roger. “The Subsidiarity Principle in European Community Law. Some Insights from Law and Economics.” Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 1:2 (1994): 337–366.10.1177/1023263X9400100402]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Van den Bergh, Roger. “Towards an Institutional Legal Framework for regulatory Competition in Europe.” Kyklos 53:4 (2000): 435–466.10.1111/1467-6435.00129]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Vaubel, Roland. “Principal-agent Problems in International Organizations.” The Review of International Organisations 1:2 (2006): 125–138.10.1007/s11558-006-8340-z]Search in Google Scholar
[53. Von Hayek, Friedrich A. “Competition as a Discovery Procedure”: 57–68. In: Friedrich A. von Hayek. New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Idea. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978.]Search in Google Scholar
[54. Wincott, Daniel, John Peterson, and Alan Convery. “Introduction: Studying Brexit’s Causes and Consequences.” British Journal of Politics and International relations 19:3 (2017): 429–433.10.1177/1369148117713481]Search in Google Scholar
[55. Wincott, Daniel. “Federalism and the European Union: The Scope and Limits of the Treaty of Maastricht.” International Political Science Review 17:4 (1996): 403–415.10.1177/019251296017004005]Search in Google Scholar
[56. Wittman, Donald. Economic Foundation of Law and Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[1. Council Directive 2000/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 June 2000 relating to cocoa and chocolate products intended for human consumption. OJ L 197, 3.8.2000.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Council Directive 2001/113/EC of 20 December 2001 relating to fruit jams, jellies and marmalades and sweetened chestnut purée intended for human consumption. OJ L 10, 12.1.2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Council Directive 2012/12/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 April 2012 amending Council Directive 2001/112/EC relating to fruit juices and certain similar products intended for human consumption. OJ L 115, 27.4.2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal C 326, 26/10/2012 P. 0001 – 0390.]Search in Google Scholar