Acceso abierto

Legal design and access to justice: a case study on child support payments in Chile

 y   
02 abr 2025

Cite
Descargar portada

Ausín, V., Abella, V., Delgado, V. and Hortigûela, D. (2016) ‘Aprendizaje basado en proyectos a través de las TIC. Una experiencia de innovación docente desde las aulas universitarias’, Formación Universitaria, 9(3), pp. 31–38. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062016000300005 Search in Google Scholar

Barnes, B.K. (2019) Building better ideas: how constructive debate inspires courage, collaboration, and breakthrough solutions. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Search in Google Scholar

Bernal, D.W. and Hagan, M.D. (2020) ‘Redesigning justice innovation: a standardized methodology’, Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties, 16(2), pp. 335–384. Search in Google Scholar

Biard, A., Hoevenaars, J., Kramer, X. and Themeli, E. (2021) ‘Introduction: The future of access to justice—beyond science fiction’, in X. Kramer, A. Biard and J. Hoevenaars (eds) New pathways to civil justice in Europe: challenges of access to justice. Springer, pp. 1–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66637-8_1 Search in Google Scholar

Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional (2021) ‘Historia de la Ley Nº 21.389. Crea el Registro Nacional de Deudores de Pensiones de Alimentos y modifica diversos cuerpos legales para perfeccionar el sistema de pago de las pensiones de alimentos.’ Available at: https://www.bcn.cl/historiadelaley/nc/historia-de-la-ley/7931/ (Accessed: 27 September 2024). Search in Google Scholar

Brown, T. (2009) Change by design: how design thinking creates new alternatives for business and society. Harper Business. Search in Google Scholar

Burnett, M. and Sandefur, R.L. (2024) ‘A people-centered approach to designing and evaluating community justice worker programs in the United States’, Fordham Urban Law Journal, 51(5), pp. 1509–1551. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4946163 Search in Google Scholar

Cappelletti, M. and Garth, B.G. (1978) ‘Access to justice: the newest wave in the worldwide movement to make rights effective’ Buffalo Law Review, 27(2), pp. 181–292. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/buffalolawreview/vol27/iss2/1 (Accessed: 27 September 2024). Search in Google Scholar

Carpenter, A. (2020) ‘Developing “NextGen” lawyers through project-based learning’, in C. Denvir (ed) Modernising legal education. Cambridge University Press, pp. 126–146. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108663311.009 Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, C.M., Dillon, K., Hall, T. and Duncan, D.S. (2016) Competing against luck: the story of innovation and customer choice. Harper Business. Search in Google Scholar

De Souza, S. and Spohr, M. (2021) Technology, innovation and access to justice: dialogues on the future of law. Edinburgh University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474473880 Search in Google Scholar

Doherty, M., Corrales Compagnucci, M., Haapio, H. and Hagan, M. (2021) ‘A new attitude to law’s empire: the potentialities of legal design’, in M. Corrales Compagnucci, H. Haapio, M. Hagan and M. Doherty (eds) Legal design: integrating business, design and legal thinking with technology. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 1–8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839107269.00008 Search in Google Scholar

Durham, C. (2022) ‘A great experiment: state supreme courts, regulatory reform in the legal profession, and access to justice’, Rutgers University Law Review, 74(4), pp. 1393–1403. Search in Google Scholar

Escudero Moreno, M.J. (2024) ‘Más del 80% de hombres demandados no paga su pensión de alimentos’, La Tercera, 13 June. Available at: https://www.latercera.com/que-pasa/noticia/mas-del-80-de-hombres-demandados-no-pagasu-pension-de-alimentos/AKS5GJUBZVBQHCX63L4MK7ZHBA/# (Accessed: September 2024). Search in Google Scholar

Guaman-Quintanilla, S., Everaert, P., Chiluiza, K. and Valcke, M. (2023) ‘Impact of design thinking in higher education: a multi-actor perspective on problem solving and creativity’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(1), pp. 217–240. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09724-z Search in Google Scholar

Haapio, H., Barton, T.D. and Corrales Compagnucci, M. (2021) ‘Legal design for the common good: proactive legal care by design’, in M. Corrales Compagnucci, H. Haapio, M. Hagan and M. Doherty (eds) Legal design: integrating business, design and legal thinking with technology. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 56–81. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839107269.00011 Search in Google Scholar

Hagan, M. (2018) ‘A human-centered design approach to access to justice: generating new prototypes and hypotheses for intervention to make courts user-friendly’, Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality, 6(2), pp. 199–239. Search in Google Scholar

Hagan, M. (2020a) ‘Legal design as a thing: a theory of change and a set of methods to craft a human-centered legal system’, Design Issues, 36(3), pp. 3–15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00600 Search in Google Scholar

Hagan, M. (2020b) ‘Design comes to the law school’, in C. Denvir (ed) Modernising legal education. Cambridge University Press, pp. 109–125. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108663311.008 Search in Google Scholar

Krug, S. (2014) Don’t make me think: a common sense approach to web usability. New Riders. Search in Google Scholar

Lillo, R. (2022) Understanding due process in non-criminal matters: how to harmonize procedural guarantees with the right to access to justice. Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95534-2 Search in Google Scholar

Lillo, R. (2023) ‘ICTs in the Chilean and Latin-American civil justice: analysis from the right of access to justice’, Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 64(3), pp. 336–362. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2023.00471 Search in Google Scholar

Lillo, R. and Vargas, M. (2021) ‘Acceso a la justicia civil y la pandemia de Covid-19’, in F. Vargas (ed) Informe anual sobre derechos humanos en Chile 2021. Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales, pp. 177–228. Search in Google Scholar

Lupica, L.R. and Grant, G. (2021) ‘Will human-centered legal design improve civil justice systems? And how will we ever know?’ in R. Ducato and A. Strowel (eds) Legal design perspectives: theoretical and practical insights from the field. Ledizioni, pp. 117–138. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5710846 Search in Google Scholar

Malhotra, N.K. (2010) Marketing research: an applied orientation. Pearson Education. Search in Google Scholar

Moreno Rojas, C.J. (2022) ‘¿Por qué los abogados somos como somos? Un análisis del comportamiento social de los abogados desde el derecho, la sociología y la educación jurídica’, Revista Pedagogía Universitaria y Didáctica del Derecho, 9(2), pp. 153–166. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-5885.2022.65254 Search in Google Scholar

Osborn, A. (1953) Applied imagination: principles and procedures of creative problem-solving. Charles Scribner’s Sons. Search in Google Scholar

Pleasence, P. and Balmer, N.J. (2012) ‘Caught in the middle: justiciable problems and the use of lawyers’, in M. Trebilcock, A. Duggan and L. Sossin (eds) Middle income access to justice. University of Toronto Press, pp. 27–54. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442660601-004 Search in Google Scholar

‘Poder Judicial en números’ (no date) Poder Judicial Republica de Chile. Available at: https://numeros.pjud.cl/Inicio (Accessed: 27 December 2024). Search in Google Scholar

Pohjonen, S. (2006) ‘Proactive law in the field of law’, in P. Wahlgren (ed) A proactive approach. Scandinavian studies in law, 49. Stockholm: Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, pp. 53–70. Available at: https://www.scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/49-4.pdf (Accessed: 24 September 2024) Search in Google Scholar

Saldaña, J. (2016) The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE Publications. Search in Google Scholar

Sandefur, R.L., Clarke, T.M. and Teufel, J. (2021) ‘Seconds to impact? Regulatory reform, new kinds of legal services, and increased access to justice’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 84, pp. 69–80. Search in Google Scholar

Solarte-Vásquez, M.C. and Hietanen-Kunwald, P. (2020) ‘Transaction design standards for the operationalisation of fairness and empowerment in proactive contracting’, International and Comparative Law Review, 20(1), pp. 180–200. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2020-0008 Search in Google Scholar

Trámite Fácil (no date) [Homepage]. Available at: https://ojv.pjud.cl/kpitec-ojv-web/tramite_facil (Accessed: 27 December 2024). Search in Google Scholar

Trujillo-Cristoffanini, M. and Araya-Concha, A. (2023) ‘No pago de pensiones de alimentos como violencia económica: análisis de género de la experiencia de mujeres chilenas’, Universum, 38(2), pp. 617–637. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-23762023000200617 Search in Google Scholar

Vargas Pavez, M. and Pérez Ahumada, P. (2021) ‘Pensiones de alimentos. Algunas razones para explicar el fenómeno del incumplimiento’, Revista de Derecho Universidad de Concepción, 89(250), pp. 219–258. Available at: https://doi.org/10.29393/RD250-6PAMP20006 Search in Google Scholar

Young, K.M. (2021) ‘What the access to justice crisis means for legal education’, U.C. Irvine Law Review, 11(3), pp. 811–850. Search in Google Scholar

Zuckerman, A. (1999) ‘Justice in crisis: comparative dimensions of civil procedure’, in A. Zuckerman (ed) Civil justice in crisis: comparative perspectives of civil procedure. Oxford University Press, pp. 3–52. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298335.003.0001 Search in Google Scholar