[
Abutalebi, Jubin–David Green. 2007. Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control. Journal of Neurolinguistics 20(3): 242–275.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Abwender, David–Jeffrey Swan–John Bowerman–Sean Connolly. 2001. Qualitative analysis of verbal fluency output: Review and comparison of several scoring methods. Assessment 8(3): 323–338.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ackel-Eisnach, Kristina−Caroline Müller. 2012. Perspektiven-, Methoden- und Datentriangulation bei der Evaluation einer kommunalen Bildungslandschaft. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum Qualitative Social Research 13(3): http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs120354. (Last accessed: 13 September 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bialystok, Ellen. 2010. Global-local and trail-making tasks by monolingual and bilingual children: Beyond inhibition. Developmental Psychology 46(1): 93–105.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bialystok, Ellen–Gregory Poarch. 2014. Language experience changes language and cognitive ability. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft 17(3): 433–446.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brickenkamp, Rolf–Lothar Schmidt-Atzert–Detlev Liepmann. 2010. Test d2 – Revision. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cameron, Roslyn. 2011. Mixed methods in business and management: A call to the first generation. Journal of Management and Organisation 17(2): 245–267.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Campbell, Donald T.–Donald W. Fiske. 1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin 56(2): 81–105.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Creswell, John. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). New York: Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Creswell, John–Clarc Plano. 2011. Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dallinger, Sara–Katrin Jonkmann–Jan Hollm–Cristiane Fiege. 2016. The effect of content and language integrated learning on students’ English and history competences – Killing two birds with one stone? Learning and Instruction 41: 23–31.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Groot, Annette–Paul Dukes. 2011. Language and Cognition in Bilinguals and Multilinguals: An Introduction. New York: Psychology Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Denzin, Norman K. 1989. The Research Act. A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dörnyei, Zoltán. 2010. Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration, and Processing. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dörnyei, Zoltán–Ema Ushioda. 2011. Teaching and Researching Motivation. Harlow: Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Escobar, Pino Gloria–Marina Kalashnikova–Paola Escudero. 2018. Vocabulary matters! The relationship between verbal fluency and measures of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 170: 177–189.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Flick, Uwe. 2008. Triangulation. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Flick, Uwe. 2014. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glaser, Barney G.−Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: ABC.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goris, José–Eddie Denessen–Ludo Verhoeven. 2019. Effects of content and language integrated learning in Europe. A systematic review of longitudinal experimental studies. European Educational Research Journal 18(6): 675–698.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, R. Burke–Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie. 2004. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher 33(7): 14–26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, R. Burke–Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie–Lisa Turner. 2007. Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1(2): 112–133.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaushanskaya, Margarita–Henrike Blumenfeld–Viorica Marian. 2019. The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Ten years later. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23(5): 945–950.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Király, Gábor−Ildikó Dén-Nagy−Zsuzsanna Géring−Beáta Nagy. 2014. Kevert módszertani megközelítések. Elméleti és módszertani alapok [Mixed methodological approaches. Theoretical and methodological foundations]. Kultúra és Közösség 5(2): 95–104.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuckartz, Udo, 2014. Mixed Methods. Methodologie, Forschungsdesign und Analyseverfahren. Wiesbaden: Springer Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuckartz, Udo 2019. Qualitative text analysis: A systematic approach. In Gabriele Kaiser–Norma Presmeg (eds), Compendium for Early Career Researchers in Mathematics Education, 181–197. ICME-13 Monographs. Hamburg: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuckartz, Udo–Stefan Rädiker. 2022. Using MAXQDA for integration in mixed methods research. In John Hitchcock–Anthony Onwuegbuzie (eds), The Routledge Handbook for Advancing Integration in Mixed Methods Research, 23–33. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lamnek, Siegfried. 2005. Qualitative Sozialforschung. Lehrbuch. Weinheim: Beltz Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lieberman, Evan. 2005. Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research. American Political Science Review 99(3): 435–452.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mayring, Philipp. 2012. Mixed-Methods – ein Plädoyer für gemeinsame Forschungsstandards qualitativer und quantitativer Methoden. In Michaela Gläser-Zikuda–Tina Seidel–Carsten Rohlfs–Alexander Gröschner–Sascha Ziegelbauer, S. (eds), Mixed Methods in der empirischen Bildungsforschung, 287–300. Münster and New York: Waxmann.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mészáros, Andrea–Anikó Kónya–Bence Kas. 2011. A verbális fluenciatesztek felvételének és értékelésének módszertana [Methodology for recording and evaluating verbal fluency tests]. Alkalmazott Pszichológia 11(2): 53–76.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morse, Janice. 2010. Procedures and practice of mixed method design: Maintaining control, rigor, and complexity. In Abbas Tashakkori–Charles Teddlie (eds), Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, 339–352. California: Thousand Oaks: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pérez-Cañado, Maria. 2012. CLIL research in Europe: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 15(3): 315–341.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richardson, Laurel. 2000. Writing: A method of inquiry. In Norman K. Denzin–Yvonne Lincoln (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 923–948. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sands, G. Roberta–Dorit Roer-Strier. 2006. Using data triangulation of mother and daughter interviews to enhance research about families. Qualitative Social Work 5(2): 237–260.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sántha, Kálmán. 2015. Trianguláció a pedagógiai kutatásban [Triangulation in Pedagogical Research]. Budapest: Eötvös József Könyvkiadó.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sántha, Kálmán. 2019. Appearance of Triangulation in Teacher Trainees’ Research Plans. Pedagogy. Bulgarian Journal of Educational Research and Practice 91(2): 275–281.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sántha-Malomsoki, Ágnes. 2021. A Mixed Methods Study on Verbal Abilities and Cognitive Flexibility of Hungarian Learners in CLIL and General Language Programmes. PhD Thesis, Multilingual Doctoral School. Veszprém: University of Pannonia. http://real-phd.mtak.hu/1063/ (Last accessed: 13 September 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Singleton, David–Simone Pfenninger. 2015. Insights from a mixed methods approach with respect to age and long-term instructed language learning. In Judit Navracsics–Szilvia Bátyi (eds), First and Second Language: Interdisciplinary Approaches, 11–21. Budapest: Tinta.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sullivan, Margot–Gregory Poarch–Ellen Bialystok. 2017. Why is lexical retrieval slower for bilinguals? Evidence from picture naming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21(3): 479–488.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tánczos, Tímea–Karolina Janacsek–Dezső Németh. 2014. A verbális fluenciatesztek II. A szemantikus fluencia-teszt magyar nyelvű vizsgálata 5–89 éves korig [Verbal fluency tests II. Examination of the semantic fluency test in Hungarian for ages 5–89]. Psychiatria Hungarica 29(2): 181–207.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tashakkori, Abbas–Charles Teddlie. 2003. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tashakkori, Abbas–Charles Teddlie. 2010. Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Troyer, Angel–Morris Moscovitch–Gordon Winocur–Michael Alexander–Don Stuss. 1998. Clustering and switching on verbal fluency: The effects of focal frontal- and temporal-lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia 36(6): 499–504.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Verd, Juan Miguel–Sergio Porcel. 2012. An application of qualitative geographic information system (GIS) in the field of urban sociology using ATLAS.ti: Uses and reflections. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum Qualitative Social Research 13(2): Art. 14. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1202144. (Last accessed: 13 September 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
