[Backhaus, Peter. 2006. Multilingualism in Tokyo: A look into the linguistic landscape. In Durk Gorter (ed.), Linguistic Landscape: A New Approach to Multilingualism, 52–66. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853599170-004]Search in Google Scholar
[Balla, Károly D. 1993. Amikor Kárpátalján a Big Ben szerint harangoztak [When Transcarpathian bells rang as the Big Ben]. In Balla Károly D. (ed.), Kis(ebbségi) magyar skizofrénia [Little Hungarian Minority Schizophrenia], 83–89. Ungvár–Budapest: Galéria Kiadó.]Search in Google Scholar
[Batt, Judy. 2002. Transcarpathia: Peripheral region at the ‘centre of Europe’. Regional & Federal Studies 12(2): 155–177.10.1080/714004744]Search in Google Scholar
[Ben-Rafael, Eliezer. 2009. A sociological approach to the study of linguistic landscapes. In Elana Shohamy–Durk Gorter (eds.), Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery, 40–54. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Beregszászi, Anikó–Csernicskó, István. 2019. Different states, same practices: Visual construction of language policy on banknotes in the territory of present-day Transcarpathia. Language Policy 18(2): 269–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-018-9485-3.10.1007/s10993-018-9485-3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Boiko, V. –Ditchuk I. –Zastavetska, L. 2016. Geografija: pidruchyk dlja 8 klasiv zagal’noosvitnih navchal’nyh zakladiv [Geography: A Textbook for the 8th Form]. Kam’janec’-Podil’s’kyj: Abetka.]Search in Google Scholar
[Csernicskó, István. 1998. A magyar nyelv Ukrajnában (Kárpátalján) [The Hungarian Language in Ukraine (Transcarpathia)]. Budapest: Osiris.]Search in Google Scholar
[Csernicskó, István. 2005. Hungarian in Ukraine. In Anna Fenyvesi (ed.), Hungarian Language Contact Outside Hungary: Studies on Hungarian as a Minority Language, 89–131. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/impact.20.11cse]Search in Google Scholar
[Csernicskó, István. 2017. Nyelv, nyelvtudás és nyelvhasználat Kárpátalján a Tandem 2016 kutatás adatai alapján [Languages, language skills, and language use in Transcarpathia based on the data of Tandem 2016]. Kisebbségi Szemle II(2): 41–63.]Search in Google Scholar
[Csernicskó, István–Ferenc, Viktória. 2014. Hegemonic, regional, minority and language policy in Subcarpathia: A historical overview and the present-day situation. Nationalities Papers 42(3): 399–425.10.1080/00905992.2013.867933]Search in Google Scholar
[Csernicskó, István–Petteri Laihonen. 2016. Hybrid practices meet nation-state language policies: Transcarpathia in the twentieth century and today. Multilingua: Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 35(1): 1–30.10.1515/multi-2014-0073]Search in Google Scholar
[Fedinec, Csilla–Csernicskó, István. 2017. Hány az óra, Vekker úr? Időzónák és politika Kárpátalján [What time is it, Mr Alarm Clock? Time zones and politics in Transcarpathia]. Kommentár 2: 81–99.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pisano, Jessica–Simonyi, André. 2016. Post-Soviet or Eurasian lands? Rethinking analytic categories in the Ukraine–EU and Russia–China borderlands. In Tone Bringa–Hege Toje (eds), Eurasian Borderlands: Spatializing Borders in the Aftermath of State Collapse, 27–58. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-58309-3_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Stroschein, Sherill. 2012. Ethnic Struggle, Coexistence, and Democratization in Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511793769]Search in Google Scholar