[
Becker, F.; Gürtler, M.; Hibbeln, M. (2015), Markowitz versus Michaud: Portfolio optimization strategies reconsidered. The European Journal of Finance 21(4): 269–291.10.1080/1351847X.2013.830138
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bouchaud, J.-P.; Potters, M. (2011). Financial applications of random matrix theory: A short review. In: The Oxford handbook of Random Matrix Theory. Oxford University Press. 824–850.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bun, J.; Bouchaud, J.-P.; Potters, M. (2017). Cleaning large correlation matrices: Tools from Random Matrix Theory. Physics Reports 666: 1–109.10.1016/j.physrep.2016.10.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Choi, Y. G.; Lim, J.; Choi, S. (2019). High-dimensional Markowitz portfolio optimization problem: Empirical comparison of covariance matrix estimators. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 89(7): 1278–1300.10.1080/00949655.2019.1577855
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DeMiguel, V.; Garlappi, L.; Nogales, F. J.; Uppal, R. (2009). A generalized approach to portfolio optimization: Improving performance by constraining portfolio norms. Management Science 55: 798–812.10.1287/mnsc.1080.0986
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DeMiguel, V.; Garlappi, L.; Uppal, R. (2009). Optimal versus naive diversification: How inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy? Review of Financial Studies 22: 1915–1953.10.1093/rfs/hhm075
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Engle, R. F.; Ledoit, O.; Wolf, M. (2019). Large dynamic covariance matrices. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 37(2): 363–375.10.1080/07350015.2017.1345683
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gillen, Benjamin J. (2016). Subset optimization for asset allocation. Social Science Working Papers 1421. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ledoit, O.; Wolf, M. (2003). Improved estimation of the covariance matrix of stock returns with an application to portfolio selection. J. Empirical Finance 10: 603–621.10.1016/S0927-5398(03)00007-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ledoit, O.; Wolf, M. (2004). Honey, I shrunk the sample covariance matrix. The Journal of Portfolio Management 30: 110–119.10.3905/jpm.2004.110
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ledoit, O.; Wolf, M. (2012). Nonlinear shrinkage estimation of large-dimensional covariance matrices. Annals of Statistics 40(2): 1024–1060.10.1214/12-AOS989
]Search in Google Scholar
[
López de Prado, M. (2016). Building diversified portfolios that outperform out-of-sample. Journal of Portfolio Management 42: 59–69.10.3905/jpm.2016.42.4.059
]Search in Google Scholar
[
López de Prado, M. (2020). Machine learning for asset managers. Cambridge University Press. Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance 7: 77–91.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marti, G. (2020), CORRGAN: Sampling realistic financial correlation matrices using generative adversarial networks. ICASSP 2020–2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Barcelona, Spain. 8459–8463.10.1109/ICASSP40776.2020.9053276
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Michaud, R. O. (1989). The Markowitz optimization enigma: Is optimized optimal? Financ. Anal. J. 45: 31–42.10.2469/faj.v45.n1.31
]Search in Google Scholar
[
PortfolioLab. https://hudson-and-thames-portfoliolab.readthedocs-hosted.com/
.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scutellà, M. G.; Recchia, R. (2013). Robust portfolio asset allocation and risk measures. Ann. Oper. Res. 204: 145–169.10.1007/s10479-012-1266-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Senneret, M.; Malevergne, Y.; Abry, P.; Perrin, G.; Jaffrès, L. (2016). Covariance versus precision matrix estimation for efficient asset allocation. In: IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 10(6): 982–993.10.1109/JSTSP.2016.2577546
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shen, W.; Wang, J. (2017). Portfolio selection via subset resampling. AAAI’17: Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1517–1523.10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10728
]Search in Google Scholar
