Invisible Inheritable Urban Biomimicry: How to Re-discover and Evaluate It

1 Uchiyama, Y., Blanco, E., Kohsaka, R. Application of biomimetics to architectural and urban design: A review across scales. Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, no. 23, pp. 9813. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239813 Search in Google Scholar

2 Quintero, A., Zarzavilla, M., Tejedor-Flores, N., Mora, D., Chen Austin, M. Sustainability assessment of the anthropogenic system in Panama City: Application of biomimetic strategies towards regenerative cities. Biomimetics, 2021, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics6040064 Search in Google Scholar

3 Zari, M. P. Regenerative urban design and ecosystem biomimicry. Routledge, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315114330 Search in Google Scholar

4 Beatley, T., Newman, P. Biophilic cities are sustainable, resilient cities. Sustainability, 2013, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 3328–3345. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5083328 Search in Google Scholar

5 Pohl, G., Nachtigall, W. Biomimetics for Architecture & Design: Nature-Analogies-Technology. Springer, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19120-1 Search in Google Scholar

6 Milliken, S., Kotzen, B., Walimbe, S., Coutts, C., Beatley, T. Biophilic cities and health. Cities & Health, 2023, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2023.2176200 Search in Google Scholar

7 Sowińska-Świerkosz, B., García, J. What are Nature-based solutions (NBS)? Setting core ideas for concept clarification. Nature-Based Solutions, 2022, vol. 2, p. 100009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2022.100009 Search in Google Scholar

8 Benyus, J. M. Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. William Morrow, 1997. 308 p. Search in Google Scholar

9 Seddon, N., Chausson, A., Berry, P., Girardin, C. A. J., Smith, A., Turner, B. Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 2020, vol. 375, no. 1794, p. 20190120. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0120 Search in Google Scholar

10 Beatley, T. Biophilic cities: Integrating nature into urban design and planning. Island Press, 2011. 192 p. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-59726-986-5 Search in Google Scholar

11 Salingaros, N. A., et al. Biophilia & healing environments: Healthy principles for designing the built world. New York, NY, USA: Terrapin Bright Green, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

12 Gertik, A., Karaman, A. The fractal approach in the biomimetic urban design: Le Corbusier and Patrick Schumacher. Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, no. 9, p. 7682. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097682 Search in Google Scholar

13 VOSviewer [online, cited 2024-07-02]. https://www.vosviewer.com/ Search in Google Scholar

14 Mansour, H. Biomimicry: A 21st-century design strategy integrating with nature in a sustainable way. BUE, FISC, 2010, vol. 12. Search in Google Scholar

15 Mohammed, B. Y., Andrey, R. Biomimicry architecture: From the inspiration by nature to the innovation of the Saharan architecture. Architecture and Engineering, 2018, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 3–12. Search in Google Scholar

16 Smith, S. E., Smith, F. A. Fresh perspectives on the roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant nutrition and growth. Mycologia, 2012, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3852/11-229 Search in Google Scholar

17 Pawlyn, M. Biomimicry in architecture. RIBA Publishing, 2019. 176 p. Search in Google Scholar

18 Taylor Buck, N. The art of imitating life: The potential contribution of biomimicry in shaping the future of our cities. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 2017, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813515611417 Search in Google Scholar

19 Garde, A. New urbanism: Past, present, and future. Urban Planning, 2020, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 453–463. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3478 Search in Google Scholar

20 Monclús, J., Díez Medina, C. Modern urban planning and modernist urbanism (1930–1950). In Urban Visions: From Planning Culture to Landscape Urbanism, 2018, pp. 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59047-9_4 Search in Google Scholar

21 Lydon, M., Garcia, A. Tactical Urbanism: Short-term Action for Long-term Change. Island Press, 2015. 256 p. Search in Google Scholar

22 Meck, S. (ed.). Growing Smart Legislative Guidebook: Model Statutes for Planning and the Management of Change. Routledge, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

23 Hrelja, R., et al. Transit Oriented Development (TOD): A Literature Review. 2020. 48 p. Search in Google Scholar

24 Spiliotopoulou, M., Roseland, M. Urban sustainability: From theory influences to practical agendas. Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, no. 18, p. 7245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187245 Search in Google Scholar

25 The Urban Scale Sustainability Compass [online, cited 01.08.2024]. http://sustainabilitycompass.eu/. Search in Google Scholar

26 Lerner, J. Urban Acupuncture. Island Press, 2014. 144 p. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-584-7 Search in Google Scholar

27 Alexander, Ch. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press, 2018. 1171 p. Search in Google Scholar

28 Mehaffy, M. W., et al. A New Pattern Language for Growing Regions: Places, Networks, Processes. Portland, Oregon, USA: Sustasis Press, 2020. 363 p. Search in Google Scholar

29 Park, Y. The network of patterns: creating a design guide using Christopher Alexander's pattern language. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2015, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1068/b130072p Search in Google Scholar

30 Almy, D., Benedikt, M. Center 14: On Landscape Urbanism. The University of Texas, Austin, 2007. 359 p. Search in Google Scholar

31 Turner, T. City as landscape: A post post-modern view of design and planning. Taylor & Francis, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

32 Lane, M. B. Public participation in planning: An intellectual history. Australian Geographer, 2005, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180500325694 Search in Google Scholar

33 Chambers, R. The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 1994, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 953–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4 Search in Google Scholar

34 Asian Development Bank. Cities for All: An Introduction to Inclusive Cities [online, cited 01.08.2024]. https://seads.adb.org/events/cities-all-introduction-inclusive-cities Search in Google Scholar

35 Moreno, C. The 15-Minute City: A Solution to Saving Our Time and Our Planet. John Wiley & Sons, 2024. 304 p. Search in Google Scholar

36 Urban Green Blue Grids. Hammarby Sjöstad, Stockholm, Sweden [online, cited 01.08.2024]. https://urbangreenbluegrids.com/projects/hammarby-sjostad-stockholm-sweden/ Search in Google Scholar

37 Verve. An Old Vision of New Living [online, cited 01.08.2024]. https://www.vervemagazine.co.nz/an-old-vision-of-new-living/ Search in Google Scholar

38 ka-news.de. Karlsruhe von oben: Spektakuläre Ausblicke über die Waldstadt [online, cited 01.08.2024]. https://www.ka-news.de/region/karlsruhe/karlsruhe-von-oben-spektakulaere-ausblicke-ueber-die-waldstadt-eine-bilderstrecke-art-2565889 Search in Google Scholar

39 Siegfried, R. Agent-based modeling and simulation. In: Modeling and Simulation of Complex Systems: A Framework for Efficient Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2014, pp. 11–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07529-3_2 Search in Google Scholar

40 Stolk, E., et al. Model Town: Using Urban Simulation in New Town Planning. Meppel: SUN Publishers, 2009. 200 p. Search in Google Scholar

41 Hillier, B. Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture. Space Syntax, 2007. 370 p. Search in Google Scholar

42 Turner, A. Depthmap 4: A researcher's handbook. Bartlett School of Graduate Studies, University College London, 2004. [cited 01.08.2024]. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/2651 Search in Google Scholar

43 Porta, S., Latora, V., Strano, E. Networks in urban design: Six years of research in multiple centrality assessment. In: Network science: Complexity in nature and technology, Springer, 2010, pp. 107–129. Search in Google Scholar

44 Estrada, E., Fox, M., Higham, D. J., Oppo, G.-L. Complex networks: An invitation. In: Network science: Complexity in nature and technology, Springer, 2010, pp. 1–11. Search in Google Scholar

45 Porta, S., Crucitti, P., Latora, V. The network analysis of urban streets: A primal approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2006, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1068/b32045 Search in Google Scholar

46 Batty, M. The new science of cities. MIT Press, 2013. 520 p. Search in Google Scholar

47 Sevtsuk, A., Mekonnen, M. Urban network analysis. Revue internationale de géomatique, 2012, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 287–305. Search in Google Scholar

48 McElhinney, S. Isovists.org. 2019. https://isovists.org/ Search in Google Scholar

49 Cooper, C. H. V., Chiaradia, A. J. F. sDNA: 3-d spatial network analysis for GIS, CAD, Command Line & Python. SoftwareX, 2020, vol. 12, 100525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2020.100525 Search in Google Scholar

50 Porta, S., Latora, V. Centrality and cities: Multiple centrality assessment as a tool for urban analysis and design. In: Network science: Complexity in nature and technology, Springer, 2010, pp. 107–129. Search in Google Scholar

51 Dupuy, G., van Schaick, J., Klaasen, I. T. Urban networks: Network urbanism. Amsterdam: Techne Press, 2008. Search in Google Scholar

52 Diestel, R. Graph theory. Springer, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-70107-2 Search in Google Scholar

53 Sabidussi, G. The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika, 1966, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 581–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289527 Search in Google Scholar

54 Freeman, L. C. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 1977, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 35–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033543 Search in Google Scholar

55 Marcus, L. Spatial capital and how to measure it: An outline of an analytical theory of the social performativity of urban form. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Space Syntax Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey, 12–15 June 2007. Search in Google Scholar

56 Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 1993, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 29–66. https://doi.org/10.1068/b200029 Search in Google Scholar

57 Ye, Y., van Nes, A. Quantitative tools in urban morphology: Combining space syntax, spacematrix and mixed-use index in a GIS framework. Urban Morphology, 2014, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 97–118. https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v18i2.3997 Search in Google Scholar

58 Hillier, B. Centrality as a process: Accounting for attraction inequalities in deformed grids. Urban Design International, 1999, vol. 4, nos. 3–4, pp. 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/135753199350036 Search in Google Scholar

59 Lennard, H. L., Lennard, S. H. Proceedings of the 19th International Making Cities Livable Conference – Children and Youth in the City. Charleston, SC, USA, March 9–13, 1997. Search in Google Scholar

60 Hillier, B. Centrality as a process: Accounting for attraction inequalities in deformed grids. Urban Design International, 1997, vol. 4, nos. 3–4, pp. 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.1999.19 Search in Google Scholar

61 Van Nes, A. Road building and urban change: The effect of ring roads on the dispersal of shop and retail in Western European towns and cities. Agricultural University of Norway, Department of Land Use and Landscape Planning, 2002. Search in Google Scholar

62 Van Nes, A., Yamu, C. Introduction to space syntax in urban studies. Springer Nature, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59140-3 Search in Google Scholar

63 Hillier, B., et al. Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 1993, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 29–66. https://doi.org/10.1068/b200029 Search in Google Scholar

64 Berhie, G. K., et al. Land use and transport mode choices: space syntax analysis of American cities. Enquiry The ARCC Journal for Architectural Research, 2017, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17831/enq:arcc.v14i1.429 Search in Google Scholar

65 Van Nes, A., López, M. J. J. Micro scale spatial relationships in urban studies: The relationship between private and public space and its impact on street life. In: Proceedings of the 6th Space Syntax Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey, 2007, pp. 12–15. Search in Google Scholar

66 Zaleckis, K., Czarnecki, B. Energy-saving potential in planning urban functional areas: The case of Bialystok (Poland). Land, 2023, vol. 12, no. 2, article 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020380 Search in Google Scholar

67 Peponis, J., Bafna, S., Zhang, Z. The connectivity of streets: reach and directional distance. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2008, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 881–901. https://doi.org/10.1068/b33089 Search in Google Scholar

68 Hillier, B., Hanson, J. The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597237 Search in Google Scholar

69 Palaiologou, G., Griffiths, S. The uses of space syntax historical research for policy development in heritage urbanism. In: Cultural Urban Heritage: Development, Learning and Landscape Strategies, 2019, pp. 19–34. Search in Google Scholar

70 Zaleckis, K., Doğan, H. A., Lopez Arce, N. Evaluation of the interventions to built heritage: Analysis of selected facades of Kaunas by space syntax and sociological methods. Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, no. 8, 4784. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084784 Search in Google Scholar

71 Hillier, B. Is architectural form meaningless? A configurational theory of generic meaning in architecture, and its limits. Journal of Space Syntax, 2011, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 125–153. Search in Google Scholar

72 Yang, T., Hillier, B. The fuzzy boundary: The spatial definition of urban areas. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey, 2007, pp. 091.01–091.16. Search in Google Scholar

73 Hillier, B. Spatial sustainability in cities: Organic patterns and sustainable forms. In: Koch, D., Marcus, L., Steen, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden, 2009, pp. K01.1–K01.20. Search in Google Scholar

74 Bobkova, E., Marcus, L., Pont, B. Multivariable measures of plot systems: Describing the potential link between urban diversity and spatial form. In: Proceedings of the 11th Space Syntax Symposium, Lisbon, Portugal, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

75 Zaleckis, K., Doğan, H. A., Lopez Arce, N. Walkability compass—a space syntax solution for comparative studies. Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, no. 4, 2033. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042033 Search in Google Scholar

76 Sevtsuk, A., Kalvo, R. Predicting pedestrian flow along city streets: A comparison of route choice estimation approaches in downtown San Francisco. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 2022, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.18583 Search in Google Scholar

77 Sevtsuk, A. Estimating pedestrian flows on street networks: Revisiting the betweenness index. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2021, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 512–526. Search in Google Scholar

78 Karimi, K. The configurational structures of social spaces: Space syntax and urban morphology in the context of analytical, evidence-based design. Land, 2023, vol. 12, no. 11, 2084. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12112084 Search in Google Scholar

79 Hillier, W. R. G., Yang, T., Turner, A. Normalising least angle choice in Depthmap—and how it opens up new perspectives on the global and local analysis of city space. Journal of Space Syntax, 2012, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 155–193. http://joss.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/journal/index.php/joss/article/view/141/pdf Search in Google Scholar

80 Poerbo, H. W., et al. Space syntax analysis for assessment of TOD area. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2022, vol. 1058, 012027. Search in Google Scholar

81 Karimi, K. A configurational approach to analytical urban design: ‘Space syntax’ methodology. Urban Design International, 2012, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2012.19 Search in Google Scholar