Experimental Harmonization of Shape Intuitive Interaction

1. Barber, J., Frankel, F. H., Kihlstrom, J. F. In Memoriam Dr. Kenneth S. Bowers (1937–1996). International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, No. 44, 1996, pp. 284–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020714960841609010.1080/00207149608416090 Search in Google Scholar

2. Bowers, S. K., Regehr, G., Balthazard, C., Parker, K. Intuition in the Context of Discovery. Cognitive psychology, Vol. 22, Issue 1, 1990, pp. 72–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(90)90004-N10.1016/0010-0285(90)90004-N Search in Google Scholar

3. Gibson, J. J. The perception of the visual world. Cambridge: The Riverside press, 1950. 235 p. Search in Google Scholar

4. Gerstenberg, T., Tenenbaum, J. Intuitive Theories. The Oxford Handbook of Causal Reasoning [In: Michael R. Waldmann ed.]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 515–548. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199399550.013.2810.1093/oxfordhb/9780199399550.013.28 Search in Google Scholar

5. Battaglia, P. W., Hamrick, J. B., Tenenbaum, J. B. Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 110, No. 45, 2013, pp. 18327–18332. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.130657211010.1073/pnas.1306572110 Search in Google Scholar

6. Baker, C. L., Saxe, R., Tenenbaum, J. B. Action understanding as inverse planning. Cognition, Vol. 113, No. 3, 2009, pp. 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.00510.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.005 Search in Google Scholar

7. Wellman, H. M. The child’s theory of mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1992. 358 p. Search in Google Scholar

8. Klein, G. A. Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998. 360 p. Search in Google Scholar

9. LeDoux, J. E. The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996. 384 p. Search in Google Scholar

10. Damasio, A. R. The feeling of what happens: Body, emotion and the making of consciousness. London: Vintage, 1999. 400 p. Search in Google Scholar

11. Gibson, J. J. Observations on active touch. Psychological review, Vol. 69, No. 6, 1962, pp. 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/h004696210.1037/h0046962 Search in Google Scholar

12. Kirsh, D., Maglio, P. On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive science, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1994, pp. 513–549. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1804_110.1207/s15516709cog1804_1 Search in Google Scholar

13. Glenberg, A., Kaschak, M. Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2002, pp. 558–565. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF0319631310.3758/BF03196313 Search in Google Scholar

14. Glenberg, A., Havas, D., Becker, R., & Rinck, M. Grounding Language in Bodily States: The Case for Emotion [In: D. Pecher and R. Zwaan Eds., Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2005, pp. 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499968.00610.1017/CBO9780511499968.006 Search in Google Scholar

15. Barsalou, L. W. Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, Vol. 22, No. 4, 1999, pp. 577–609. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X9900214910.1017/S0140525X99002149 Search in Google Scholar

16. Trends in Universal Design: An anthology with global perspectives, theoretical aspects and real world examples. Norwegian Directorate for Children, Youth and Family Affairs, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

17. Universal Design 2016: Learning from the Past, Designing for the Future [H. Petrie, J. Darzentas, T. Walsh, D. Swallow, L.Sandoval, A. Lewis, Ch. Power eds.]. Studies in health technology and informatics, Vol. 229, New York: IOS Press, 2016. 704 p. Search in Google Scholar

18. Steinfeld, E., Maisel, J. Universal Design: creating inclusive environments, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2012. 408 p. Search in Google Scholar

19. Goals, Global Universal Design Commission [online, cited 20.02.2020]. http://www.globaluniversaldesign.org/goals Search in Google Scholar

20. Blake, H. M. Examining perceptions of graphic symbols across cultures: Preliminary study of the impact of culture/ethnicity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2000, pp. 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/0743461001233127903410.1080/07434610012331279034 Search in Google Scholar

21. Jakaitis, J., Žukas, J. Intuitive spatial interaction in landscape design. Landscape architecture and art, Vol. 15, No. 15, 2020, pp. 22–30. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2019.15.0210.22616/j.landarchart.2019.15.02 Search in Google Scholar

22. Monö, R. G., Knight, M., Monö, R. Design for product understanding: The aesthetics of design from a semiotic approach, Liber, 1997. Search in Google Scholar

23. Sawtoothsoftware, MaxDiff Technical Paper [online, cited 12.03.2019]. https://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/support/technical-papers/maxdiff-best-worst-scaling/maxdiff-technical-paper-2013 Search in Google Scholar

24. Volvo XC90 owner’s manual [online, cited 08.01.2019] https://volvornt.harte-hanks.com/manuals/2018/17wk46/XC90_OwnersManual_MY18_en-US_TP24829.pdf Search in Google Scholar

25. Dimensions, Volvo cars [online, cited 10.01.2019] https://www.volvocars.com/intl/cars/new-models/xc90/specifications/dimensions Search in Google Scholar

26. Handbook of human factors in medical device design [M. B. Weinger, M. E. Wiklund, D. J. Gardner-Bonneau, eds.]. Boca Raton, Florida, U.S.: CRC Press, 2010. 844 p. Search in Google Scholar

27. Dotson, J. P., Beltramo, M. A., Feit, E. M., Smith, R. C. Modeling the Effect of Images on Product Choices, April 12, 2019. 53 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.228257010.2139/ssrn.2282570 Search in Google Scholar

28. Kang, N., Ren, Y. Feinberg, F.M., Papalambros, P. Form+Function: Optimizing Aesthetic Product Design via Adaptive, Geometrized Preference Elicitation. University of Michigan, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

29. Kreuzbauer, R., Malter, A. J. Embodied cognition and new product design: Changing product form to influence brand categorization. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2005, pp. 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00112.x10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00112.x Search in Google Scholar

30. Ranscombe, C., Hicks, B., Mullineux, G., Singh, B. Visually decomposing vehicle images: Exploring the influence of different aesthetic features on consumer perception of brand. Design Studies, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2012, pp. 319–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.06.00610.1016/j.destud.2011.06.006 Search in Google Scholar