[1. Auriga, A. & Wróbel, J. (2018). Effect of effective micro-organisms on the proline and mda contents in herb plant. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 27(11), pp. 7409–7415.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Angelini G., Ragni P., Esposito D., Giardi P., Pompili M.L., Moscardelli L. & Giardi M.T. (2001). A device to study the effect of space radiation on photosynthetic organism. In Physica Medica – Vol. XVII, Supplement 1, 1st International Workshop on pace Radiation Research and 11 th Annual NASA Space Radiation Health Investigators’ Workshop Arona (Italy), May 27-31, 2000.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Arnon, D. I., Allen, M. B. & Whatley, F. R. (1956). Photosynthesis by isolated chloroplasts IV. General concept and comparison of three photochemical reactions. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 20(3), pp. 449–461. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(56)90339-0.10.1016/0006-3002(56)90339-0]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Belkhodja, R., Morales, F., Medrano & H., Abadia, J.(1999). Effects of salinity on chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) grown under a triple-line-source sprinkler system in the field. Photosynthetica, 36(3), pp. 375–387. doi:10.1023/A:1007019918225.10.1023/A:1007019918225]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Bates, L.S., Waldren, R.P. & Teare, I.K. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant and Soil 39, pp. 205–208.10.1007/BF00018060]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Borkowski, J., Kowalczyk, W. & Felczyńska, A. (2017). Effect of spraying with Tytanit and Wapnovit on the yield and healthiness of chinese cabbage. Zeszyty Naukowe Instytutu Ogrodnictwa 2017, 25: pp. 187 – 195.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Carvajal, M. & Alcaraz, C. F. (1998). Why titanium is a beneficial element for plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 21(4), pp. 655–664. doi:10.1080/01904169809365433.10.1080/01904169809365433]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Chutipaijit, S., Cha-um, S. & Sompornpailin, K. (2011). High contents of proline and anthocyanin increase protective response to salinity in Oryza sativa L. spp. indica. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5(10):1191-1198]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Dias, M. I., Barros, L., Morales, P., Cámara, M., Maria José Alves, M. J., Beatriz, M., Oliveira, P. P., Santos-Buelgaf, C. & Ferreira, I. (2016). Wild Fragaria vesca L. fruits: A rich source of bioactive phytochemicals. Food and Function, 7(11):4523–4532. doi:10.1039/c6fo01042c.10.1039/C6FO01042C]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Garcıa-Sanchez, F., Jifon, L.J., Carvajala, M. & Syvertsen, P. (2002). Gas exchange, chlorophyll and nutrient contents in relation to Na+ and Cl− accumulation in ‘Sunburst’ mandarin grafted on different rootstocks. Plant Science. Vol. 162, pp. 705–712. doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00010-910.1016/S0168-9452(02)00010-9]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Gomes, M.A.C., Pestana I.A., Santa-Catarina C., Hauser-Davis R.A. & Satika Suzuki M. (2017). Salinity effects on photosynthetic pigments, proline, biomass and nitric oxide in Salvinia auriculata Aubl.’ Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia, vol. 29, pp. 1-13.10.1590/s2179-975x4716]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Hager A. & Mayer-Berthenrath T.(1966). Die Isolier- ung und quanttative Bestimung der Carotenoide und Chlorophyll von Blatern, Algen und isolierten Chloroplasten mit Hilfe Dunnschicht-chromatographischer Methoden. Planta. Berlin, 69, pp. 198–21710.1007/BF00384873]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Hrubý, M., Cígler, P. & Kuzel, S. (2002). Contribution to understanding the mechanism of titanium action in plant. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 25(3), pp. 577–598. doi: 10.1081/PLN-120003383.10.1081/PLN-120003383]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Islam, M.M., Hoque, M.A., Okuma, E., Banu, M.N.A., Shimoishi, Y., Nakamura,Y. & Murata Y. (2009). Exogenous proline and glycinebeta- ine increase antioxidant enzyme activities and confer tolerance to cadmium stress in cultured tobacco cells. J. Plant Physiol. 166, pp. 1587–1597.10.1016/j.jplph.2009.04.00219423184]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Jamil, A., Riaz S., Ashraf M. & Foolad M. R. (2011). Gene Expression Profiling of Plants under Salt Stress. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 30 (5): 435–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2011.605739.10.1080/07352689.2011.605739]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Kalaji, M.H. & Łoboda, T. (2010). Chlorophyll fluorescence in the study of the physiological state of plants. Publishing house SGGW, Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Karolewski, P. (1996). Role of proline in higher plants under conditions of abiotic stress. Botanic News. 40(3/4), pp: 67-81]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Kruczek, A., Ochmian, I., Krupa-Małkiewicz, M. & Lachowicz, S. (2020). Comparison of morphological, antidiabetic and antioxidant properties of goji fruits. Acta Universitatis Cibiniensis Series E: Food Technology. Vol. XXIV no. 1, pp: 1-1410.2478/aucft-2020-0001]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Kura-Hotta, M., Satoh, K. & Katoh, S.(1987). Relationship between photosynthesis and chlorophyll content during leaf senescence of rice seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol. Vol. 28, pp. 1321–1329]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Kuzel, S., Hruby, M., Cigler, P., Tlustos, P. & Nguyen Van, P. (2003). Mechanism of physilogical effects of Titanium leaf sprays on plants grown on soil. Biological Trce Element Research. Vol. 91, pp. 179 - 18910.1385/BTER:91:2:179]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Lichtenthaler, H. K. & Wellburn, A. R. (1983). Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochemical Society Transactions. Portland Press, 11(5), pp. 591–592. doi: 10.1042/bst0110591.10.1042/bst0110591]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Michalski, P. (2008). The effect of Tytanit® on the yield structure and the fruit size of strawberry cv. “Senga Sengana” and “Elsanta”. Annales UMCS, Agricultura, 63(3). doi:10.2478/v10081-008-0038-x.10.2478/v10081-008-0038-x]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Michałek, W. & Sawicka, B. (2005). Chlorophyll content and photosynthetic activity of medium late potato varieties in arable field conditions in Central and Eastern Poland. Acta Agrophys. 6(1), pp. 183–195.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Mir, S., Sirousmehr, A. & Shirmohammadi, E. (2015). Effect of nano and biological fertilizers on carbohydrate and chlorophyll content of forage sorghum (Speedfeed hybrid). International Journal of Biosciences, 6(4), pp. 157–164. doi: 10.12692/ijb/6.4.157-164.10.12692/ijb/6.4.157-164]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Moaveni, P., Aliabadi Farahani, H. & Maroufi, K. (2011). Effect of nanoparticles Tio2 spraying on deferent parameters of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Advances in Environmental Biology. 2011;5(8), pp. 2217-2219.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Muñoz, C., Sanchez-Sevilla, J.F., Botella, M.A., Hoffmann, T., Schwab, W. & Valpuesta, V. (2011). Polyphenol composition in the ripe fruits of fragaria species and transcriptional analyses of key genes in the pathway. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 59(23), pp. 12598–12604. doi: 10.1021/jf203965j.10.1021/jf203965j]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Muscolo, A., Panuccio, M. R. & Sidari, M. (2003). Effects of salinity on growth, carbohydrate metabolism and nutritive properties of kikuyu grass (Pennisetum clandestinum Hochst). Plant Science, 164(6), pp. 1103–1110. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00119-5.10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00119-5]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Nadi, E., Aynehband A.& Mojaddam M. (2013). Effect of nano-iron chelate fertilizer on grain yield, protein percent and chlorophyll content of Faba bean (Vicia faba L.). International Journal of Biosciences 3(9), pp: 267-272. doi.org/10.12692/ijb/3.9.267-2710.12692/ijb/3.9.267-272]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Noreen, Z. & Ashraf, M. (2009). Assessment of variation in antioxidative defense system in salt-treated pea (Pisum sativum) cultivars and its putative use as salinity tolerance markers. Journal of Plant Physiology, 166(16), pp. 1764–1774. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2009.05.005.10.1016/j.jplph.2009.05.005]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Oancea, S. & Oprean, L. (2011). Anthocyanins, from biosynthesis in plants to human health benefits. Acta Universitatis Cibiniensis Series E: Food Technology. Vol. XV, no.1, pp: 3 - 16]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Pereira W.E., de Siqueria D.L., Martinez C. A. & Puiatti M. (2000). Gas exange and chlorophyll fluorescence in four citrus rootstocks under aluminium stress. J. Plant Plant Physiol. 157, pp. 513-520.10.1016/S0176-1617(00)80106-6]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Parihar, P., Singh S., Singh R., Singh, V.P. & Prasad, S.M. (2015). Effect of salinity stress on plants and its tolerance strategies: A Review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22 (6), pp. 4056–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3739-1.10.1007/s11356-014-3739-1]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Rahimi, A., Biglarifard, A. & Firozabadi, M. (2011). Influence of NaCl salinity on some physiological aspect of strawberry cv. Camarosa. Russian Agricultural Sciences, 37(5), pp. 378–384. doi: 10.3103/S1068367411050028.10.3103/S1068367411050028]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Romero-Aranda, R., Soria, T. & Cuartero, J. (2001). Tomato plant-water uptake and plant-water relationships under saline growth conditions. Plant Science, 160(2), pp. 265–272. doi:10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00388-5.10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00388-5]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Saha, P., Chatterjee, P. & Biswas, A. K. (2010). NaCl pretreatment alleviates salt stress by enhancement of antioxidant defense system and osmolyte accumulation in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Indian journal of experimental biology, 48(6), pp. 593–600.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Samadi, N. (2014).Effect of TiO2 and TiO2 nanoparticle on germination, root and shoot length and photosynthetic pigments of Mentha piperita. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 3(4), pp. 408–418. doi: 10.9734/ijpss/2014/7641.10.9734/IJPSS/2014/7641]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Samadi, N., Yahyaabadi, S. & Rezayatmand, Z. (2015). Stress effects of TiO2 and NP-TiO2 on catalase enzyme and some physiological characteristics of Melissa officinalis L.. European Journal of Medicinal Plants, 9(1), pp. 1–11. doi:10.9734/ejmp/2015/18055.10.9734/EJMP/2015/18055]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Schweiger, J., Lang, M. & Lichtenthaler, H.K. (1996). Differences in fluorescence excitation spectra of leaves between stressed and non-stressed plants. J Plant Physiol. 148(5), pp: 536–54710.1016/S0176-1617(96)80073-3]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Shahbaz, M. & Ashraf, M. (2013). Improving Salinity Tolerance in Cereals. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 32(4), pp. 237–249. doi: 10.1080/07352689.2013.758544.10.1080/07352689.2013.758544]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Shrivastava, P. & Kumar, R. (2015). Soil salinity: A serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 22(2), pp. 123–131. doi:10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.12.001.10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.12.001]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Sultana, N., Ikeda, T. & Itoh, R. (1999). Effect of NaCl salinity on photosynthesis and dry matter accumulation in developing rice grains. Environmental and Experimental Botany. Elsevier, 42(3), pp. 211–220. doi:10.1016/S0098-8472(99)00035-0.10.1016/S0098-8472(99)00035-0]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Wróbel, J., Auriga, A. & Mielczarek, M. (2016). The effect of salinity and nitrogen deficiency on the changes in selected physiological parameters of common bean (Phaseoleus vulgaris L.) grown in hydroponic cultures. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 17(4), pp. 321–327. doi:10.12911/22998993/64557.10.12911/22998993/64557]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Yamaguchi, T. & Blumwald, E. (2005). Developing salt-tolerant crop plants: challenges and opportunities. Trends in Plant Science, 10(12), pp. 615–620. doi:10.1016/J.TPLANTS.2005.10.002.10.1016/j.tplants.2005.10.00216280254]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Yamasaki S.& Dillenburg L.R. (1999). Measurements of leaf relative water content in Araucaria angustifolia. Rev. Bras. Fisiol. Vegetal. 11(2), pp: 69–75.]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Xiaoqing Y., Suiqi Z., Zongsuo L & Ying S. (2004). Effects of water stress on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of different drought resistance winter wheat cultivars seedlings. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 24(5), pp. 812-816.]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Zhu, J. K. (2001). Plant salt tolerance. Trends in Plant Science, 6(2), pp. 66–71. doi:10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01838-0.10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01838-0]Search in Google Scholar