[Barış, E., & Esra, K. (2014). Yeni toplumsal hareketlerin sınıf dinamiği: Türkiye LGBT Hareketi. Marmara University Journal of Political Sciences, 2(1), 93-113.10.14782/SBD.201416302]Search in Google Scholar
[Barozzi, S., & Ojeda, J. R. G. (2016). Sexual identities in EFL at primary school level: A pre-service teachers’ perspective from Spain. Porta Linguarum: Revista Internacional de Didáctica de Las Lenguas Extranjeras, 25, 9-20.10.30827/Digibug.53885]Search in Google Scholar
[Best, S., & Kellner, D. (1991). The postmodern theory: Critical interrogations. London: McMillan Educational Ltd.10.1007/978-1-349-21718-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Feldon, D. F., & Tofel-Grehl, C. (2018). Phenomenography as a Foundation for Mixed Models Research. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(7), 887-899.10.1177/0002764218772640]Search in Google Scholar
[Gáborová, Ľ. (2011). Humanistic psychology in the university preparation of future teachers. Acta Technologica Dubnicae, 1(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1515/atd-2015-004110.1515/atd-2015-0041]Search in Google Scholar
[Giroux, H. (1988). Teacher education as cultural politics. In H. Giroux, Schooling and the struggle for public life (pp. 188-202). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Giroux, H. (1993a). Living dangerously: Multiculturalism and the politics of difference. New York: Peter Lang.]Search in Google Scholar
[Giroux, H. (1993b). Border crossing: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gray, J. (2013). LGBT Visibility and Heteronormativity in ELT Materials. In J. Gray (Ed.), Critical Perspectives of Language Teaching Materials (pp.40-63). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137384263_3]Search in Google Scholar
[Güney, Ö. (2018). Queering teacher education programs: perceptions of pre-service EFL teachers towards queer issues (Doctoral dissertation). Ankara: Bilkent University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Halstead, J. M., & Lewicka, K. (1998). Should homosexuality be taught as an acceptable alternative lifestyle? A Muslim perspective. Cambridge Journal of Education, 28(1), 49-64.10.1080/0305764980280105]Search in Google Scholar
[Huić, A., Jelić, M., & Kamenov, Ž. (2016). What predicts the willingness of heterosexual persons to behave in a positive or negative manner towards homosexual persons? Kriminologija & socijalna integracija: časopis za kriminologiju, penologiju i poremećaje u ponašanju, 23(2), 110-141.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ilyas, H. P. (2017). Historical Perspective: The Development of Critical Thinking in Indonesian ELT. Journal of ELT Research, 2(2), 89-102.10.22236/JER_Vol2Issue2pp89-102]Search in Google Scholar
[Kite, M. E., & Deaux, K. (1986). Attitudes toward homosexuality: Assessment and behavioral consequences. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 137-162.10.1207/s15324834basp0702_4]Search in Google Scholar
[Lewis, R., & Mills, S. (Eds.). (2003). Feminist postcolonial theories: A reader. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203825235]Search in Google Scholar
[Mambu, J. E. (2016). Investigating students’ negotiation of religious faiths in ELT contexts: A critical spiritual pedagogy perspective. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 13(3), 157-182.10.1080/15427587.2016.1150145]Search in Google Scholar
[Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography: Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177-200.10.1007/BF00132516]Search in Google Scholar
[Marton, F. (1988). Phenomenography: Exploring different conceptions of reality. In D. M. Fetterman (Ed.), Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education: The silent scientific revolution (pp. 176-205). New York: Praeger.]Search in Google Scholar
[Morgan, B. (2007). Poststructuralism and applied linguistics: Complementary approaches to identity and culture in ELT. In J. Cummins, & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (Vol. 2) (pp. 949-968). Norwell, MA: Springer Publishers.10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_69]Search in Google Scholar
[Namaste, K. (1994). The politics of inside/out: Queer theory, poststructuralism, and a sociological approach to sexuality. Sociological Theory, 12, 220-231.10.2307/201866]Search in Google Scholar
[Nelson, C. (1993). Heterosexism in ESL: Examining our attitudes. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 143-150.10.2307/3586966]Search in Google Scholar
[Nelson, C. (1999). Sexual identities in ESL: Queer theory and classroom inquiry. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 371-391.10.2307/3587670]Search in Google Scholar
[Nelson, C. (2002). Why Queer Theory is useful in teaching: A perspective from English as a second language teaching. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 14(2), 43-53.10.1300/J041v14n02_04]Search in Google Scholar
[Nelson, C. D. (2008). Sexual identities in English language education: Classroom conversations. New York and London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203891544]Search in Google Scholar
[Nelson, C. D. (2010). A gay immigrant student’s perspective: Unspeakable acts in the language class. Tesol Quarterly, 44(3), 441-464.10.5054/tq.2010.226853]Search in Google Scholar
[Orta, İ. M., & Camgöz, S. M. (2018). Türkiye’de Yapılan Homofobi Çalışmalarına Genel Bir Bakış. (A general perspective towards homophobic studies in Turkey.). DTCF Journal, 58(1), 409-439.10.33171/dtcfjournal.2018.58.1.21]Search in Google Scholar
[Osaďan, R. (2012). Gender Stereotypes and Elementary School Teachers. Acta Technologica Dubnicae, 2(2), 25-29. https://doi.org/10.1515/atd-2015-005710.1515/atd-2015-0057]Search in Google Scholar
[Osaďan, R., & Safir, Y. (2014). A Cross-Cultural Examination of Curriculum and Sexuality Outcomes in Primary School. Acta Technologica Dubnicae, 4(2), 67-72. https://doi.org/10.1515/atd-2015-000710.1515/atd-2015-0007]Search in Google Scholar
[Paiz, J. M. (2018). Queering ESL teaching: Pedagogical and materials creation issues. TESOL Journal, 9(2), 348-367.10.1002/tesj.329]Search in Google Scholar
[Peters, M. (1996). Poststructuralism, Politics, and Education. Critical Studies in Education and Culture. Bergin and Garvey: Westport.]Search in Google Scholar
[Phillipson, R. (2017). Myths and realities of ‘global’ English. Language Policy, 16(3), 313-331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-016-940910.1007/s10993-016-9409-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Renn, K. A. (2010). LGBT and queer research in higher education: The state and status of the field. Educational Researcher, 39(2), 132-141.10.3102/0013189X10362579]Search in Google Scholar
[Sarıçoban, A., & Kazazoğlu, S. (2012). Topic preferences of Turkish ELT students and teachers in text books. Sino-US English Teaching, 9(2), 887-892.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tekin, M. (2011a). Discussing the unspeakable: A study on the use of taboo topics in EFL speaking classes. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 7(1), 79-110.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tekin, M. (2011b). Breaking the shell: A study on Turkish students’ reactions towards sexual identity issues in the language classroom. Gay and Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review, 7(3), 216-231.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thornbury, S. (2017). Scott Thornbury’s 30 language teaching methods Google EBook: Cambridge handbooks for language teachers. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009024686]Search in Google Scholar
[Tollefson, J. W. (2007). Ideology, language varieties, and ELT. In J. Cummins, & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 25-36). New York: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_3]Search in Google Scholar
[Walters, M. (2005). Feminism: a very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/actrade/9780192805102.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Yılmaz, V., & Göçmen, I. (2015). Summary results of the social and economic problems of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transsexual (LGBT) individuals in Turkey research. Center for Policy and Research on Turkey, 4, 97-105.]Search in Google Scholar
[Willis, A. S. (2018). The efficacy of phenomenography as a cross-cultural methodology for educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 41(5), 483-499.10.1080/1743727X.2017.1283398]Search in Google Scholar