Performance Evaluation of Artificial Neural Network Modelling to a Ploughing Unit in Various Soil Conditions

1ABRAHÁM, R. – ZUBČÁK, T. – MAJDAN, R. – KOLLÁROVÁ, K. – MATEJKOVÁ, E. –MASAROVIČOVÁ, S. – DRLIČKA, R. 2022. Drawbar performance of tractor tyres with steel spikes at 100%-wheel slip. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 97–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2022-0016Search in Google Scholar

2AHMADI, I. 2018. A draught force estimator for disc harrow using the laws of classical soil mechanics. In Biosystems Engineering, vol. 171, pp. 52–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.04.008Search in Google Scholar

3AL-JANOBI, A. – AL-HAMED, S. – ABOUKARIMA, A. – ALMAJHADI, Y. 2020. Modeling of draft and energy requirements of a moldboard plow using artificial neural networks based on two novel variables. In Engenharia Agrícola, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 363–373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v40n3p363-373/2020Search in Google Scholar

4Al-MASTAWI, K. E. – DAHHAM, G. A. – YAHYA, L. M. 2022. Effects of soil moisture content, tire inflation pressure, and tillage speed on tractive performance of 2WD tractor in Northern Iraq. In Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 133–139.Search in Google Scholar

5ALGEZI, A. – ALMALIKI, S. 2022. Prediction of fuel consumption criteria of tractor using neural networks and mathematical models. In Annals of Forest Research, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 8902–8922.Search in Google Scholar

6ALMALIKI, S. 2018. Simulation of draft force for three types of plow using response surface method under various field conditions. In Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1123–1124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v49i6.151Search in Google Scholar

7BADGUJAR, C. – DAS, S. – FIGUEROA, D. M.– FLIPPO, D. 2022. Application of computational intelligence methods in agricultural soil-machine interaction: A review. In Agriculture, vol. 13, no. 2, article no. 357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020357Search in Google Scholar

8BORGES, P. H. M. – MENDOZA, Z. M. S. H. – MAIA, J. C. S. – BIANCHINI, A. – FERNÁNDES, H. C. 2017. Estimation of fuel consumption in agricultural mechanized operations using artificial neural networks. In Engenharia Agricola, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 136–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v37n1p136-147/2017Search in Google Scholar

9CVIKLOVIČ, V. – SRNÁNEK, R. – HRUBÝ, D. – HARNIČÁROVÁ, M. 2021. The control reversing algorithm for autonomous vehicles with PSD-controlled trailers. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 187–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2021-0031Search in Google Scholar

10DANE, J. H. – TOPP, C. G. 2020. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 4: Physical Methods (20^th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, 1744 pp. ISBN 978-0-891-18893-3Search in Google Scholar

11DIZAJI, H. Z. – KHORASANI, M. E. – NATEGH, N. A. – SHEIKHDAVOODI, M. – ANDEKAIEZADEH, K. 2022. Specific draft modeling for combined and simple tillage implements. In Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 41–56.Search in Google Scholar

12DULF, E. H. – VODNAR, D. C. – DANKU, A. – MARTĂU, A. G. – TELEKY, B. E. – DULF, F. V. – RAMADAN, M. F. – CRISAN, O. 2022. Mathematical modeling and optimization of Lactobacillus species single and co-culture fermentation processes in wheat and soy dough mixtures. In Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 10, pp. 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.888827Search in Google Scholar

13FAWZI, H. – MOSTAFA, S. A. – AHMED, D. – ALDUAIS, N. – MOHAMMED, M. A. – ELHOSENY, M. 2021. TOQO: A new tillage operations quality optimization model based on parallel and dynamic decision support system. In Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 316, article no. 128263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128263Search in Google Scholar

14FAZEL, F. – GOLMOHAMMADI, A. – SHAHGHOLI, G. – AHMADI, E. 2020. Predictions of the apple bruise volume on the basis of impact energy or maximum contact force using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 118–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2020-0019Search in Google Scholar

15FORKUOR, G. – HOUNKPATIN, O. K. L. – WELP, G. – THIEL, M. 2017. High resolution mapping of soil properties using remote sensing variables in south-western Burkina Faso: A comparison of machine learning and multiple linear regression models. In PLoS ONE, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170478Search in Google Scholar

16GAUTAM, P. V. – TIWARI, P. S. – AGRAWAL, K. N. – ROUL, A. K. – KUMAR, M. – SINGH, K. 2022. Optimisation and modelling of draft and rupture width using response surface methodology and artificial neural network for tillage tools. In Soil Research, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 816–838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/SR21271Search in Google Scholar

17GEBRE, T. – ABDI, Z. – WAKO, A. – YITBAREK, T. 2023. Development of a mathematical model for determining the draft force of ard plow in silt clay soil. In Journal of Terramechanics, vol. 106, pp. 13–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2022.11.004Search in Google Scholar

18GILL, W. R. – VANDEN BERG, G. E. 1968. Soil Dynamics in Tillage and Traction. Agriculture Handbook No. 316, 511 pp. Washington, D.C. : U. S. Government Printing Office.Search in Google Scholar

19HAN, L. – YANG, G. – DAI, H. – XU, B. – YANG, H. – FENG, H. – LI, Z. – YANG, X. 2019. Modeling maize above-ground biomass based on machine learning approaches using UAV remote-sensing data. In Plant Methods, vol. 15, no. 1, article no. 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-019-0394-zSearch in Google Scholar

20HE, C. – GUO, Y. – GUO, X. – SANG, H. 2023. A mathematical model for predicting the draft force of shank-type tillage tine in a compacted sandy loam. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 228, article no. 105642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2023.105642Search in Google Scholar

21KARSAVRAN, Y. – ERDIK, T. 2021. Artificial intelligence based prediction of seawater level: A case study for Bosphorus Strait. In International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1242–1254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33889/IJMEMS.2021.6.5.075Search in Google Scholar

22KHEIRALLA, A. F. – YAHYA, A. – ZOHADIE, M. – ISHAK, W. 2004. Modelling of power and energy requirements for tillage implements operating in Serdang sandy clay loam, Malaysia. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 21–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2003.12.011Search in Google Scholar

23KHESSRO, M. K. – HILAL, Y. Y. – AL-JAWADI, R. A. – AL-IRHAYIM, M. N. 2022. Greenhouse energy analysis and neural networks modelling in Northern Iraq. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 205–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2022-0030Search in Google Scholar

24LÓPEZ-VÁZQUEZ, A. – CADENA-ZAPATA, M. – CAMPOS-MAGAÑA, S. – ZERMEÑO-GONZALEZ, A. – MENDEZ-DORADO, M. 2019. Comparison of energy used and effects on bulk density and yield by tillage systems in a semiarid condition of Mexico. In Agronomy, vol. 9, no. 4, article no. 189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9040189Search in Google Scholar

25MOHAMMED, S. J. – ABDEL-KHALEK, H. A. – HAFEZ, S. M. 2022. Predicting performance measurement of residential buildings using machine intelligence techniques (MLR, ANN and SVM). In Iranian Journal of Science and Technology – Transactions of Civil Engineering, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 3429–3451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-021-00742-4Search in Google Scholar

26NKAKINI, S. O. 2015. Draught force requirements of a disc plough at various tractor forward speeds in loamy sand soil, during ploughing. In International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 52–68.Search in Google Scholar

27ODUMA, O. – EHIOMOGUE, P. – OKEKE, C. G. – ORJI, N. F. – UGWU, E. C. – UMUNNA, M. F. – NWOSU-OBIEOGU, K. 2022. Modeling and optimization of energy requirements of disc plough operation on loamy-sand soil in South-East Nigeria using response surface methodology. In Scientific African, vol. 17, article no. e01325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01325Search in Google Scholar

28OMAR, M. – SHANABLEH, A. – MUGHIEDA, O. – ARAB, M. – ZEIADA, W. – AL-RUZOUQ, R. 2018. Advanced mathematical models and their comparison to predict compaction properties of fine-grained soils from various physical properties. In Soils and Foundations, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1383–1399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2018.08.004Search in Google Scholar

29OSKOUI, K. E. – HARVEY, S. J. 1992. Predicting cone index from soil physical properties and organic matter content. Paper no. 92-1056. St. Joseph, MI, USA : American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, pp. 1–16.Search in Google Scholar

30PENTOŚ, K. – PIECZARKA, K. – LEJMAN, K. 2020. Application of soft computing techniques for the analysis of tractive properties of a low-power agricultural tractor under various soil conditions. In Complexity, vol. 2020, article no. 7607545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7607545Search in Google Scholar

31QURAISHI, M. Z. – MOUAZEN, A. M. 2013. Development of a methodology for in situ assessment of topsoil dry bulk density. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 126, pp. 229–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.08.009Search in Google Scholar

32RAJABI-VANDECHALI, M. – ABBASPOUR-FARD, M. H. – ROHANI, A. 2018. Development of a prediction model for estimating tractor engine torque based on soft computing and low cost sensors. In Measurement, vol. 121, pp. 83–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.02.050Search in Google Scholar

33SANTOS, F. L. – DE JESUS, V. A. M. – VALENTE, D. S. M. 2012. Modeling of soil penetration resistance using statistical analyses and artificial neural networks. In Acta Scientiarum – Agronomy, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 219–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v34i2.11627 Search in Google Scholar

34SERRANO, J. M. – PEÇA, J. O. – MARQUES DA SILVA, J. – PINHEIRO, A. – CARVALHO, M. 2007. Tractor energy requirements in disc harrow systems. In Biosystems Engineering, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 286–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.08.002Search in Google Scholar

35SHAFAEI, S. M. – LOGHAVI, M. – KAMGAR, S. 2018. A comparative study between mathematical models and the ANN data mining technique in draft force prediction of disk plow implement in clay loam soil. In Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 71–79.Search in Google Scholar

36SOYSAL, A. – OZTURK, H. H. 2023. Energy saving measures for soil tillage. In European Journal of Agriculture & Food Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24018/ejfood.2023.5.1.590Search in Google Scholar

37TATAR, A. – NASERI, S. – SIRACH, N. – LEE, M. – BAHADORI, A. 2015. Prediction of reservoir brine properties using radial basis function (RBF) neural network. In Petroleum, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 349–357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2015.10.011Search in Google Scholar

38UPADHYAY, G. – RAHEMAN, H. 2019. Specific draft estimation model for offset disc harrows. In Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 191, pp. 75–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.03.021Search in Google Scholar

39VARANI, M. – MATTETTI, M. – MOLARI, G. – BIGLIA, A. – COMBA, L. 2023. Correlation between power harrow energy demand and tilled soil aggregate dimensions. In Biosystems Engineering, vol. 225, pp. 54–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2022.11.008Search in Google Scholar

40ZHANG, Y. – DU, Y. – YANG, Z. – CHEN, D. – SONG, Z. – ZHU, Z. 2022. Construction method of high-horsepower tractor digital twin. In Digital Twin, vol. 2, no. 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/digitaltwin.17615.1Search in Google Scholar

41ZHAO, J. – ZHOU, J. – SUN, C. – WANG, X. – LIANG, Z. – QI, Z. 2022. Identification model of soil physical state using the Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy neural network. In Agriculture, vol. 12, no. 9, article no. 1367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12091367Search in Google Scholar