[
[1]. Antonov, A. Information. Perception and understanding. AN USSR, Naukova dumka, K, 1988.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[2]. Antonova, L.; Vasileva-Tcankova, R. Syntactic relationships between signs in chemical symbolism and their relationship with conceptual systems “substance” and “chemical reaction”. Yearbook of Konstantin Preslavski University of Shumen - Natural Sciences, 2006, XVI B3, 53-62.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[3]. Antonova, L.; Vasileva-Tcankova, R. Semiotic approaches to the study of chemical symbols. Chemistry, 2008, XVII, 3, 181–191.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[4]. Antonova, L.; Vasileva-Tcankova, R. Modeling of the “Learning Process” system using semiotic approaches. Yearbook of Konstantin Preslavski University of Shumen, Natural Sciences – Methodology, 2009, XIX B5, 23-32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[5]. Beneva, S.; Kostadinov, M.; Danalev, D. et al. Chemistry and environmental protection for 8. Grade, Part One for 9. class at training with intensive learning of a foreign language, Bulvest 2000, Sofia, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[6]. Bizhkov, G.; Kraevski, V. Methodology and methods of pedagogical research. St. Kliment Ohridski University Publishing House, Sofia, 1999.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[7]. Bizhkov, G. Pedagogy-Psychological Diagnostics, Part I and II. St. Kliment Ohridski University Publishing House, S., 2003.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[8]. Boyanova, L.; Nikolov, K.; Ushagelov, I.; Todorova, E. Chemistry and environmental protection for 8. Class, Part One for 9. grade at training with intensive learning of a foreign language, Education Plus Ltd., Sofia, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[9]. Vasileva-Tcankova, R.; Antonova, L. Use a pragmatic approach to study chemical reactions and how to mean them. Yearbook of Konstantin Preslavski University of Shumen – Natural Sciences – Methodology, 2006, XVI B3, 63-75.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[10]. Vasileva-Tcankova, R.; Antonova, L. Meaning of the processes “coding” and “decoding” in the study of the Theory of Chemical Relationship in the 8th grade. Natural Sciences – Chemistry, University Publishing House Konstantin Preslavski, Shumen, 2002, 66-74.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[11]. Vasileva-Tcankova, R. Essence of semiotic approaches in the study of chemical symbols. Yearbook of Konstantin Preslavski University of Shumen – Natural Sciences – Methodology, 2007, XVII B5, 24–33.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[12]. Vasileva-Tcankova, R. Use of semiotic approaches in the study of chemical symbols. Dissertation on the award of educational and scientific degree Doctor, Sofia, 2009.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[13]. Ganchev, D. Modeling in chemistry training, IPKU A.Tosheva, Stara Zagora, 1993.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[14]. Ivanov, I. Pedagogical Diagnostics. Konstantin Preslavski University Publishing House, Shumen, 2006.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[15]. Kostadinov, M.; Ovcharova, L.; Beneva, S. et al. Chemistry and environmental protection for 7. grade, Bulvest 2000, Sofia, 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[16]. Krasnovskiy, E.; Kogan, G. The quality of knowledge, skills, abilities as a criterion for assessing the educational achievements of schoolchildren. Sovetskaya pedagogika, Book 8, 1980.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[17]. Lerner, I. Didactic system of teaching methods. Knowledge, Pedagogy and Psychology, Book. 3, Moscow, 1976.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[18]. Lerner, I. The quality of students’ knowledge. What should they be? Knowledge, Pedagogy and psychology, Book 1, Moscow, 1978.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[19]. Lerner, I. The learning process and its patterns. Knowledge, Pedagogy and psychology, Book 3, Moscow, 1980.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[20]. Malcheva, Z.; Genkova, L.; Angelova, V. Methodology for training in chemistry, St. Kliment Ohridski University publishing, Sofia, 1999.
]Search in Google Scholar
