[
[1]. Antonova, L.; Galcheva, P. About the composition of the chemical language in training. Chemistry, 1992, 4, 44-50.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[2]. Antonova, L.; Filipova, R. Use of semiotic approach in the study of chemical symbolism. Yearbook of Konstantin Preslavski University of Shumen, 1997, XIV D, 118-123.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[3]. Antonova, L.; Galcheva, P.; Vasileva, R. Use of semantic approach in the introduction of chemical equations. Chemistry, 2001, 5, 309-316.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[4]. Antonova, L.; Vasileva-Tcankova, R. Syntactic relations between the signs in chemical symbolism and their relationship with the mean systems “substance” and “chemical reaction”. Yearbook of University of Shumen Konstantin Preslavski. Natural Sciences, 2006, XVI B3, 53-62.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[5]. Antonova, L.; Vasileva-Tcankova, R. Semiotic approaches to the study of chemical symbols. Chemistry, 2008, XVII, 181-191.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[6]. Antonova, L.; Vasileva-Tcankova, R. Modeling of the “Learning Process” system using semiotic approaches. Yearbook of Konstantin Preslavski University of Shumen –Natural Sciences – Methodology, item XIX B 5, 2009, 23-32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[7]. Vasileva-Tcankova R., Antonova L. Use a pragmatic approach to study chemical reactions and how to mean them. Yearbook of University of Shumen Konstantin Preslavski. Natural Sciences – Methodology, 2006, XVI B3, 63-75.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[8]. Vasileva-Tcankova R. Essence of semiotic approaches in the study of chemical symbols. Yearbook of University of Shumen Konstantin Preslavski. Natural Sciences – Methodology, 2007, XVII B5, 24-33.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[9]. Vasileva-Tcankova, R. Use of semiotic approaches in the study of chemical symbols. Dissertation on the award of educational and scientific degree Doctor, Sofia, 2009.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[10]. Vasileva-Tcankova, R.; Zhelyazkova, V. Opportunities of science semiotics to develop research and training approaches. Compendium of reports from the 19th century. National Conference with International Participation “Natural Sciences 2021, University of Shumen Konstantin Preslavski, Shumen, 2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[11]. Ganchev, G. Modeling in chemistry training, IPCU „A. Tosheva“, Stara Zagora, 1993.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[12]. Malcheva, Z.; Genkova, L.; Angelova, V. Methods of chemistry training, University Publishing House St. Kliment Ohridski, Sofia, 1999.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[13]. Milev, A.; Nikolov, B.; Bratkov, J. Dictionary of Foreign Words in Bulgarian Language, Science and Art, Sofia, 2003.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[14]. Milkov, L.; Kolev, G. General pedagogy. Didactics, Polygraph LTD, Shumen, 1994.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[15].Nikolova, R. Theoretical modeling as a method of scientific knowledge in chemistry training. The Intensification of the Educational Process, Section 4, IPCU A. Tosheva, Stara Zagora, 1984.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[16].Fridman, L. Modeling in educational activity. The Formation of Educational Activity of Schoolchildren, Pedagogy, M., 1982.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[17]. Fridman, L. Visibility and modeling in training. Knowledge, Pedagogy and Psychology, Moscow, 1984.
]Search in Google Scholar
