[
1. Tin-Oo MM, Saddki N, Hassan N. Factors influencing patient satisfaction with dental appearance and treatments they desire to improve aesthetics. BMC Oral Health. 2011;11(1):1–8.10.1186/1472-6831-11-6305927121342536
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Samorodnitzky-Naveh GR, Geiger SB, Levin L. Patients’ satisfaction with dental esthetics. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2007;138(6):805–8.10.14219/jada.archive.2007.026917545270
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. McLaren EA, Giordano R. Ceramics overview: classification by microstructure and processing methods. International Dentistry – African Edition. 2014;4(3):18–30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Sakaguchi, Powers. Craig’s Restorative dental materials. Edition thirteen. Elsevier Mosby; 2012. P.33–49; 85; 91; 253–258.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Anusavice K, Shen C, Rawls R. Philip’s Science od Dental Materials. Edition twelve. Elsevier; 2013.P. 48–64.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Domingues NB, Galvão BR, Ribeiro S, Almeida Junior AA de, Longhini D, Adabo GL. Comparison of the indentation strength and single-edge-v-notched beam methods for dental ceramic fracture toughness testing. Braz J Oral Sci. 2017;15(2):109-112.10.20396/bjos.v15i2.8648760
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Chun KJ, Lee JY. Comparative study of mechanical properties of dental restorative materials and dental hard tissues in compressive loads. Journal of Dental Biomechanics. 2014;5:1–6.10.1177/1758736014555246
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Shenoy A, Shenoy N. Dental ceramics: An update. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13(4):195–203.10.4103/0972-0707.73379301002321217946
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Li RWK, Chow TW, Matinlinna JP. Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD/CAM technology: State of the art. Journal of Prosthodontic Research. 2014;58(4):208–16.10.1016/j.jpor.2014.07.00325172234
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Leung BTW, Tsoi JKH, Matinlinna JP, Pow EHN. Comparison of mechanical properties of three machinable ceramics with an experimental fluorophlogopite glass ceramic. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2015;114(3):440–6.10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.02.02426013069
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Fasbinder DJ. Materials for Chairside CAD/CAM Restorations. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry. 2010;31(9):702–9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Atay DDS, PhD A, Sağirkaya DDS, PhD E. Effects of Different Storage Conditions on Mechanical Properties of CAD/CAM Restorative Materials. Odovtos - Int J Dent Sc. 2019;161–74.10.15517/ijds.2020.38742
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Helvey GA. Classification of Dental Ceramics. Inside dentistry. 2013;April 2013:62–76.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Sen N, Us YO. Mechanical and optical properties of monolithic CAD-CAM restorative materials. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2018;119(4):593–9.10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.06.01228781072
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Low IM. Advances in Ceramic Matrix Composites. Edition secound. Woodhead publishing; 2018. P.711–721.10.1016/B978-0-08-102166-8.00001-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Vichi A, Sedda M, Del Siena F, Louca C, Ferrari M. Flexural resistance of Cerec CAD/CAM system ceramic blocks. Part 1: Chairside materials. American Journal of Dentistry. 2013;26(5):255–9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. D’Arcangelo C, Vanini L, Rondoni GD, De Angelis F. Wear properties of dental ceramics and porcelains compared with human enamel. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2016;115(3):350–5.10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.01026553254
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Denry I, Holloway J. Ceramics for Dental Applications: A Review. Materials. 2010;3(1):351–68.10.3390/ma3010351
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Blackburn C, Rask H, Awada A. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD-CAM materials after accelerated aging. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2018;119(6):954–8.10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.01629195816
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Lu T, Peng L, Xiong F, et al. A 3-year clinical evaluation of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with two different materials using the CEREC AC chair-side system. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2018;119(3):363–8.10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.02228689915
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Shiozawa M, et al. Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater J. 2014;33(5):705–10.10.4012/dmj.2014-20825273052
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Sonmez N, Gultekin P, Turp V, Akgungor G, Sen D, Mijiritsky E. Evaluation of five CAD/CAM materials by microstructural characterization and mechanical tests: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(5):1–13.10.1186/s12903-017-0458-2576401729321010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Lambert H, Durand J-C, Jacquot B, Fages M. Dental biomaterials for chairside CAD/CAM: State of the art. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017;9:486–95.10.4047/jap.2017.9.6.486574145429279770
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Alamoush RA, Silikas N, Salim NA, Al-Nasrawi S, Satterthwaite JD. Effect of the Composition of CAD/CAM Composite Blocks on Mechanical Properties. BioMed Research International. 2018;2018:1–8.10.1155/2018/4893143621879830426009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Sulaiman TA. Materials in digital dentistry—A review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32(2):171–81.10.1111/jerd.1256631943720
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. de Kok P, de Jager N, Veerman IAM, Hafeez N, Kleverlaan CJ, Roeters JFM. Effect of a retention groove on the shear bond strength of dentin-bonded restorations. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2016;116(3):382–8.10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.03227112414
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Badawy R, El-Mowafy O, Tam L. Fracture toughness of chairside CAD/CAM materials – Alternative loading approach for compact tension test. Dental Materials. 2016;32:847–52.10.1016/j.dental.2016.03.00327133875
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Bajraktarova-Valjakova E, Korunoska-Stevkovska V, Kapusevska B, Gigovski N, Bajraktarova-Misevska C, Grozdanov A. Contemporary Dental Ceramic Materials, A Review: Chemical Composition, Physical and Mechanical Properties, Indications for Use. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018;6(9):1742–55.10.3889/oamjms.2018.378618251930338002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Sannino G, Germano F, Arcuri L, Bigelli E, Arcuri C, Barlattani A. Cerec CAD/CAM chairside system. Oral & Implantology. 2014;7(3):57–70.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J.2008;204(9):505–11.10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.35018469768
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Vargas MA, Bergeron C, Diaz-Arnold A. Cementing all-ceramic restorations. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2011;142:20S-24S.10.14219/jada.archive.2011.033921454837
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Brenes DC, Duqum I, Mendonza G. Materials and systems for all c-eramic CAD/CAM restorations. Dental tribute. 2016;3:10–5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Pitiaumnuaysap L, Phokhinchatchanan P, Suputtamongkol K, Kanchanavasita W. Fracture resistance of four dental computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing glass-ceramics. Mahidol Dental Journal. 2017;37(2):201–8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Ritzberger C, Apel E, Höland W, Peschke A, Rheinberger V. Properties and Clinical Application of Three Types of Dental Glass-Ceramics and Ceramics for CAD-CAM Technologies. Materials. 2010;3(6):3700–13.10.3390/ma3063700
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Zhu J, Rong Q, Wang X, Gao X. Influence of remaining tooth structure and restorative material type on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars: A finite element analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2017;117(5):646–55.10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.02327881319
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Byeon S-M, Song J-J. Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of the Leucite-Reinforced Glass-Ceramics for Dental CAD/CAM. J Dent Hyg Sci. 2018;18(1):42–9.10.17135/jdhs.2018.18.1.42
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Furtado de Mendonca A, Shahmoradi M, Gouvêa CVD de, De Souza GM, Ellakwa A. Microstructural and Mechanical Characterization of CAD/CAM Materials for Monolithic Dental Restorations: Characterization of CAD/CAM Materials. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2019;28(2):587–94.10.1111/jopr.1296430121945
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Culp L, McLaren EA. Lithium Disilicate: The Restorative Material of Multiple Options. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry. 2010;31(9):716–25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Lawson NC, Bansal R, Burgess JO. Wear, strength, modulus and hardness of CAD/CAM restorative materials. Dental Materials. 2016;32(11):275–83.10.1016/j.dental.2016.08.22227639808
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Goujat A, Abouelleil H, Colon P, Jeannin C, Pradelle N, Seux D, et al. Mechanical properties and internal fit of 4 CAD-CAM block materials. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2018;119(3):384–9.10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.00128552287
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Zarone F, Ferrari M, Mangano FG, Leone R, Sorrentino R. “Digitally Oriented Materials”: Focus on Lithium Disilicate Ceramics. International Journal of Dentistry. 2016;2016:1–10.10.1155/2016/9840594500734027635140
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Elsaka SE, Elnaghy AM. Mechanical properties of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic. Dental Materials. 2016;32(7):908–14.10.1016/j.dental.2016.03.01327087687
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Zhang Y, Lawn BR. Novel Zirconia Materials in Dentistry. Journal of Dental Research. 2018;97(2):140-147.10.1177/0022034517737483578447429035694
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Chen X-P, Xiang Z-X, Song X-F, Yin L. Machinability: Zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramic versus lithium disilicate glass ceramic. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2020;101:1–10.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103435
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. Ramos N de C, Campos TMB. Microstructure characterization and SCG of newly engineered dental ceramics. Dental Materials. 2016;32(7):870–8.10.1016/j.dental.2016.03.01827094589
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Sacher E, Franca R. Dental Biomaterials. Vol. secound. New Jersey: World Scientific; 2018. P.148–203.10.1142/10589
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. Willard A, Gabriel Chu T-M. The science and application of IPS e.Max dental ceramic. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences. 2018;34(4):238–42.10.1016/j.kjms.2018.01.01229655413
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Eakle WS, Bastin KG. Dental Materials Clinical Applications for Dental Assistants and Dental Hygienists. fourth. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. McLaren EA, Figueira J. Updating Classifications of Ceramic Dental Materials: A Guide to Material Selection. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry. 2015;36(6):739–44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. Rinke S, Rödiger M, Ziebolz D, Schmidt A-K. Fabrication of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic Restorations Using a Complete Digital Workflow. Case Reports in Dentistry. 2015;1–7.10.1155/2015/162178460980626509088
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. Rinke S, Pabel A-K, Rödiger M, Ziebolz D. Chairside Fabrication of an All-Ceramic Partial Crown Using a Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic. Case Reports in Dentistry. 2016;1–7.10.1155/2016/1354186479983227042362
]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. Traini T, Sinjari B, Pascetta R, et al. The zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic: lights and shadows of a new material. Dental Materials Journal. 2016;35(5):748–55.10.4012/dmj.2016-04127546858
]Search in Google Scholar
[
53. Helvey GA. Zirconia and Computer-aided Design/Computer-aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Dentistry. Inside dentistry. 2008;4(4).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
54. Della Bona A, Borba M, Benetti P, et al. Adhesion to Dental Ceramics. Curr Oral Health Rep. 2014;1(4):232–8.10.1007/s40496-014-0030-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
55. Passos SP, Torrealba Y, Major P, Linke B, Flores-Mir C, Nychka JA. In Vitro Wear Behavior of Zirconia Opposing Enamel: A Systematic Review: Enamel Wear Caused by Zirconia Ceramics. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2014;23(8):593–601.10.1111/jopr.1216724957813
]Search in Google Scholar
[
56. Alghazzawi TF, Lemons J, Liu P-R, Essig ME, Bartolucci AA, Janowski GM. Influence of Low-Temperature Environmental Exposure on the Mechanical Properties and Structural Stability of Dental Zirconia: Zirconia Exposed to Low-Temperature Degradation. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2012;21(5):363–9.10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00838.x22372432
]Search in Google Scholar
[
57. Burgess JO. Zirconia: The Material, Its Evolution, and Composition. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry. 2018;39(4):4–8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
58. Meirelles L. Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials: An Overview of Clinical Uses and Considerations. ADA professional product rewiev. 2017;12(1):1–9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
59. Campos F, Almeida C, Rippe M, de Melo R, Valandro L, Bottino M. Resin Bonding to a Hybrid Ceramic: Effects of Surface Treatments and Aging. Operative Dentistry. 2015;40(6):1–8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
60. Ceren N, Turp V, Emir F, Akgungor G, Ayyildiz S, Şen D. Nanoceramics and hybrid
]Search in Google Scholar
[
61. materials used in CAD/CAM systems. Aydın Dental Journal. 2016;55–61.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
62. Dirxen C, Blunck U, Preissner S. Clinical Performance of a New Biomimetic Double Network Material. The Open Dentistry Journal. 2013;7:118–22.10.2174/1874210620130904003380758224167534
]Search in Google Scholar
[
63. Wang H, Cui B, Li J, et al. Mechanical properties and biocompatibility of polymer infiltrated sodium aluminum silicate restorative composites. J Adv Ceram. 2017;6(1):73–9.10.1007/s40145-016-0214-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
64. Della Bona A, Corazza PH, Zhang Y. Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material. Dental Materials. 2014;30(5):564–9.10.1016/j.dental.2014.02.019465162324656471
]Search in Google Scholar
[
65. Bao YW, Gong J, Tian. Testing and Evaluation of Inorganic Materials I. Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications Ltd; 2011. P.300.
]Search in Google Scholar
