Iniciar sesión
Registrarse
Restablecer contraseña
Publicar y Distribuir
Soluciones de Publicación
Soluciones de Distribución
Temas
Arquitectura y diseño
Artes
Ciencias Sociales
Ciencias de la Información y Bibliotecas, Estudios del Libro
Ciencias de la vida
Ciencias de los materiales
Deporte y tiempo libre
Estudios clásicos y del Cercano Oriente antiguo
Estudios culturales
Estudios judíos
Farmacia
Filosofía
Física
Geociencias
Historia
Informática
Ingeniería
Interés general
Ley
Lingüística y semiótica
Literatura
Matemáticas
Medicina
Música
Negocios y Economía
Química
Química industrial
Teología y religión
Publicaciones
Revistas
Libros
Actas
Editoriales
Blog
Contacto
Buscar
EUR
USD
GBP
Español
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Carrito
Home
Revistas
Artificial Satellites
Volumen 58 (2023): Edición s1 (December 2023)
Acceso abierto
Application of the Kuka Kube Test-Bed for the Hardware-in-the-Loop Validation of the Space Manipulator Control System
Mateusz Wojtunik
Mateusz Wojtunik
,
Piotr Łuczak
Piotr Łuczak
,
Tomasz Rybus
Tomasz Rybus
y
Grzegorz Granosik
Grzegorz Granosik
| 29 dic 2023
Artificial Satellites
Volumen 58 (2023): Edición s1 (December 2023)
Acerca de este artículo
Artículo anterior
Artículo siguiente
Resumen
Artículo
Figuras y tablas
Referencias
Autores
Artículos en este número
Vista previa
PDF
Cite
Compartir
Publicado en línea:
29 dic 2023
Páginas:
230 - 248
Recibido:
14 dic 2022
Aceptado:
17 ago 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/arsa-2023-0025
Palabras clave
space manipulator
,
hardware-in-the-loop
,
experimental validation
,
control systems
,
orbital robotics
,
KUKA industrial robot
© 2023 Mateusz Wojtunik et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
Schematic view of the n-DoF space manipulator
Figure 2.
KUKA KUBE test-bed
Figure 3.
Communication diagram for KUKA KUBE test-bed hardware-in-the-loop experiments. Blue rectangles with continuous borders represent hardware components. Green, inner rectangles with dashed borders represent software components that were created or modified to perform the experiment. Brackets around parameters are added to improve subscript readability
Figure 4.
Logical diagram for KUKA KUBE test-bed hardware-in-the-loop experiments
Figure 5.
Schematic representation of the performed experiment
Figure 6.
Diagrammatic description of a single control loop iteration
Figure 7.
Frames captured by the camera mounted inside the KUKA KUBE test-bed that show the KUKA manipulator during experiments.From left to right: t = 0 (initial configuration), t = 6.6s, t = 13.3 s, t = 20 s (final configuration)
Figure 8.
Manipulator joint angular positions measured in the experiment and signal approximation for the comparison simulation
Figure 9.
The approximation error for joint angular positions measured in the experiment
Figure 10.
Manipulator end-effector position and orientation with respect to the simulated inertial frame Πine – comparison with the simulation results
Figure 11.
Difference in manipulator end-effector position and orientation with respect to the simulated inertial frame Πine between the experimental and simulation results
Figure 12.
Satellite position and attitude with respect to the simulated inertial frame Πine – comparison with the simulation results
Figure 13.
Difference in satellite position and attitude with respect to the simulated inertial frame Πine between experimental and simulation results
Figure 14.
Time of evaluation for each iteration of the MATLAB loop
Figure 15.
The net torque acting on the second manipulator joint – comparison with the simulation
Figure 16.
The net torque acting on each manipulator joint – comparison with the simulation
Figure 17.
The difference in net torque acting on each manipulator joint between the experimental and simulation results
KUKA LBR iiwa 14 R820 DH table
i
α
i
[deg]
θ
m
i
[deg]
a
i
[m]
d
i
[m]
1
90
θ
m
1
0
0.360
2
−90
θ
m
2
0
0
3
−90
θ
m
3
0
0.420
4
90
θ
m
4
0
0
5
90
θ
m
5
0
0.400
6
−90
θ
m
6
0
0
7
0
θ
m
7
+ 180
0
0.126
Vista previa