[
Barthelmes F. (2013) Definition of Functional of the Geopotential and Their Calculation from Spherical Harmonic Models, Scientific Technical Report STR09/02: Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences. https://doi.org/10.2312/GFZ.b103-0902-26
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barthelmes F. (2014) Global models. In: Grafarend E. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Geodesy. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02370-043-1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bhattacharyya B. K. (1978) Computer modeling in gravity and magnetic interpretation. Geophysics, Vol. 43, No. 5, 912-929.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Birbiraw D. (2015) Evaluation of Accuracy of Earth Gravity Model 2008 (EGM2008) using GPS and Levelling at central and western part of Ethiopia, Unpublished Master thesis, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bolkas D., Fotopoulos G., and Braun A. (2016) On the impact of airborne gravity data to fused gravity field models, Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 90, No. 6, 561-571.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bruinsma S., Förste C., Abrikosov O., Lemoine J., Marty J., Mulet S., Rio M., and Bonvalot S. (2014) ESA’s satellite-only gravity field model via the direct approach based on all GOCE data; Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 41, No. 21, 7508-7514, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062045.10.1002/2014GL062045
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ermias W. (2015) Evaluation of Accuracy of Earth Gravity Model 2008 (EGM2008) using GPS and Levelling at DebreBirhan city, Unpublished Master thesis, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Floberghagen R., Fehringer M., Lamarre D., Muzi D., Frommknecht B., Steiger C.H., Pineiro J., and da Costa A. (2011) Mission design, operation and exploitation of the gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation explorer mission. Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 85, No. 11, 749-758.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Förste C., Abrykosov O., Bruinsma S., Dahle C., König R., and Lemoine J. (2019) ESA’s Release 6 GOCE gravity field model by means of the direct approach based on improved filtering of the reprocessed gradients of the entire mission (GO_CONS_GCF_2_DIR_R6). GFZ Data Services. https://doi.org/10.5880/ICGEM.2019.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Förste C., Bruinsma S. L., Abrikosov O., Lemoine J.-M., Marty J. C., Flechtner F., Balmino G., Barthelmes F., and Biancale R. (2014) EIGEN-6C4: The latest combined global gravity field model including GOCE data up to degree and order 2190 of GFZ Potsdam and GRGS Toulouse. GFZ Data Services. https://doi.org/10.5880/icgem.2015.1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gerard A. and Debeglia N. (1975) Automatic three dimensional modeling for the interpretation of gravity or magnetic anomalies. Geophysics, Vol.40, No. 6, 1014-1034.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Godah W., Szelachowska M., and Krynski J. (2017) On the analysis of temporal geoid height variations obtained from GRACE-based GGMs over the area of Poland. ActaGeophysica, Vol. 65, 713-725.10.1007/s11600-017-0064-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hackney R.I., Featherstone W.E. (2003) Geodetic versus geophysical perspectives of the ‘gravity anomaly’, Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 154, Issue 1, 35–43, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01941.x10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01941.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hammond J.O.S., Kendall J.M., Stuart G.W., Keir D., Ebinger C., Ayele A., and Belachew M. (2011) The nature of the crust beneath the afar triple junction: Evidence from receiver functions, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems,, Vol. 12, Q12004, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GC003738.10.1029/2011GC003738
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heiskanen W. A., and Moritz H. (1967) Physical geodesy: W.H. Freeman and Company.10.1007/BF02525647
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hildenbrand T.G., Briesacher A., Flanagan G., Hinze W.J., Hittelman A.M., Keller G.R., Kucks R.P., Plouff D., Roest W., Seeley J., Smith D.A., and Webring M. (2002) Rationale and Operational Plan to Upgrade the U.S Gravity Database. USGS Open-File Report 02-463.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ince E.S., Barthelmes F., Reißland S., Elger K., Förste C., Flechtner F., Schuh H. (2019) ICGEM – 15 years of successful collection and distribution of global gravitational models, associated services and future plans. - Earth System Science Data, 11, pp. 647-674, http://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-647-2019.10.5194/essd-11-647-2019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kivior I. and Boyd D. (1998) Interpretation of the aeromagnetic experimental survey in the Eromanga/Cooper basin. Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysics, Vol. 34, No. 1 and 2, 58-66.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lavayssière A., Rychert C., Harmon N., Keir D., Hammond J.O., Kendall J.M., Doubre C., Leroy S. (2018) Imaging Lithospheric Discontinuities beneath the Northern East African Rift Using S-to-P Receiver Functions. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, Vol. 19, No. 10, 4048-4062. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018gc00746310.1029/2018GC007463
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Novák P., 2010. Direct modeling of the gravitational field using harmonic series. ActaGeodynamica et Geomaterialia, Vol. 7, No. 1, 35-47.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oliveira Jr., Vanderlei C., Uieda L, Hallam K., Barbosa A.T., and Valéria C.F. (2018) Code and data for “Should geophysicists use the gravity disturbance or the anomaly?” https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1255306
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pavlis N.K., Holmes S. A., Kenyon S. C., and Factor J. K. (2012) The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008). Journal of geophysical research: solid earth, 117(B4)10.1029/2011JB008916
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Philippe N.N., Eliezer M.D., Théophile N.M. and Tabod C.T. (2006) Spectral analysis and gravity modelling in the Yagoua, Cameroon, sedimentary basin, GeofísicaInternacional, Vol. 45, No. 210.22201/igeof.00167169p.2006.45.3.206
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reigber C., Lühr H., and Schwintzer P. (2002) CHAMP mission status. Advances in Space Research, Vol. 30, No. 2, 129-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(02)00276-410.1016/S0273-1177(02)00276-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rummel R., Balmino G., Johannessen J., Visser P., and Woodworth P. (2002) Dedicated gravity field missions-principles and aims, Journal of Geodynamics, Vol. 33, 3-20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spector A. and Grant F.S. (1970) Statistical models for interpreting aeromagnetic data. Geophysics, Vol.35,293-302. 10.1190/1.1440092
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tapley B.D., Bettadpur S., Watkins M., and Reigber C. (2004) The gravity recovery and climate experiment: mission overview and early results. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 31, L09607. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019920 10.1029/2004GL019920
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yilmaz M., Turgut B., Gullu M., and Yilmaz I. (2017) The evaluation of high-degree geopotential models for regional geoid determination in Turkey, AKU Journal of Science and Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 1, 147-153.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yilmaz M., Turgut B., Gullu M., and Yilmaz I. (2016) Evaluation of recent global geopotential models by GNSS/Levelling data: Internal Aegean region. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, Vol. 1, No. 1, 15-19. https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.285221 10.26833/ijeg.285221
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zerihun G. (2017) Evaluation of Gravity Field Models: EIGEN-6C4 and GOCO03S combined with EGM08 using GNSS-Levelling, Unpublished Master thesis, Adama Science and Technology University, Adama, Ethiopia
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zingerle P., Pail R., Gruber T., and Oikonomidou X. (2019) The experimental gravity field model XGM2019e. GFZ Data Services. https://doi.org/10.5880/ICGEM.2019.007
]Search in Google Scholar
