This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod 1971;60:111-27.Search in Google Scholar
Midgård J, Björk G, Linder-Aronson S. Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks and errors of measurements of cephalometric cranial distances. Angle Orthod 1974;44:56-61.Search in Google Scholar
Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 1983;83:382-90.Search in Google Scholar
Houston WJ, Maher RE, McElroy D, Sherriff M. Sources of error in measurements from cephalometric radiographs. Eur J Orthod 1986;8:149-51.Search in Google Scholar
Onkosuwito EM, Katsaros C, van’t Hof MA, Bodegom JC, Kuipers-Jagtman AM. The reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of analogue and digital methods. Eur J Orthod 2002;24:655-65.Search in Google Scholar
Liu JK, Chen YT, Cheng KS. Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2000;118:535–540.Search in Google Scholar
Cevidanes LH, Styner MA, Proffit WR. Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006;129:611-18.Search in Google Scholar
Halazonetis DJ. From 2-dimensional cephalograms to 3-dimensional computed tomography scans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:627-37.Search in Google Scholar
Hatcher DC, Aboudara CL. Diagnosis goes digital. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:512-15.Search in Google Scholar
Mah J, Hatcher DC. Three-dimensional craniofacial imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:308-9.Search in Google Scholar
Ghoneima A, Abdel-Fattah E, Eraso F, Fardo D, Kula K, Hartsfield J. Skeletal and dental changes after rapid maxillary expansion: a computed tomography study. Aust Orthod J 2010;26:141-8.Search in Google Scholar
Ghoneima A, Abdel-Fattah E, Hartsfield J, El-Bedwehi A, Kamel A, Kula K. Effects of rapid maxillary expansion on the cranial and circummaxillary sutures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:510-19.Search in Google Scholar
Richardson A. A comparison of traditional and computerized methods of cephalometric analysis. Eur J Orthod 1981;3:15-20.Search in Google Scholar
Sandler PJ. Reproducibility of cephalometric measurements. Br J Orthod 1988;15:105-10.Search in Google Scholar
Gravely JF, Benzies PM. The clinical significance of tracing error in cephalometry. Br J Orthod 1974;1:95-101.Search in Google Scholar
Chen YJ, Chen SK, Yao JC, Chang HF. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry. Angle Orthod 2004;74:155-161.Search in Google Scholar
Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 2. Conventional angular and linear measures. Am J Orthod 1971;60:505-17.Search in Google Scholar
Kamoen A, Dermaut L, Verbeeck R. The clinical significance of error measurement in the interpretation of treatment results. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:569-78.Search in Google Scholar
Stabrun AE, Danielsen K. Precision in cephalometric landmark identification. Eur J Orthod 1982;4:185-96.Search in Google Scholar
Perillo MA, Beideman RW, Shofer FS, Jacobsson-Hunt U, Higgins-Barber K, Laster LL, Ghafari JG. Effect of landmark identification on cephalometric measurements: guidelines for cephalometric analyses. Clin Orthod 2000;3:29-36.Search in Google Scholar
Broch J, Slagsvold O, Rosler M. Error in landmark identification in lateral radiographic headplates. Eur J Orthod 1981;3:9-13.Search in Google Scholar
Major PW, Johnson DE, Hesse KL, Glover KE. Effect of head orientation on posterior anterior cephalometric landmark identification. Angle Orthod 1996;66:51-60.Search in Google Scholar
Kazandjian S, Kiliaridis S, Mavropoulos A. Validity and reliability of a new edge-based computerized method for identification of cephalometric landmarks. Angle Orthod 2006;76:619-24.Search in Google Scholar
Macri V, Wenzel A. Reliability of landmark recording on film and digital lateral cephalograms. Eur J Orthod 1993;15:137-48.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen AM, Linney AD. A low cost system for computer-based cephalometric analysis. Br J Orthod 1986;13:105-8.Search in Google Scholar
Cevidanes LHS Franco AA, Gerig G, Proffit WR, Slice DE, Enlow DH, et al. Comparison of relative mandibular growth vectors using high resolution 3-dimensional imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2005;128:27-34.Search in Google Scholar
Chen YJ, Chen SK, Chang HF, Chen KC. Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry. Angle Orthod 2000;70:387-92.Search in Google Scholar
Bruntz LQ, Palomo JM, Baden S, Hans MG. A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006;130:340-8.Search in Google Scholar
Sekiguchi T, Savara BS. Variability of cephalometric landmarks used for face growth studies. Am J Orthod 1972;61:603-18.Search in Google Scholar
Swennen GR, Barth EL, Schutyser F, De Groeve P, Lemaitre A. Three-dimensional (3-D) cephalometry. The basics for virtual planning. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg 2004;32:(Suppl 1)135.Search in Google Scholar
Swennen GR, Schutyser F, Barth EL, De Groeve P, De Mey A. A new method of 3-D cephalometry. Part I: the anatomic cartesian 3-D reference system. J Craniofac Surg 2006;17:314-25.Search in Google Scholar
Cavalcanti MG, Hailer JW, Vannier MW. Three-dimensional computed tomography landmark measurement in craniofacial surgical planning: experimental validation in vitro. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57:690-4.Search in Google Scholar
Kumar V, Ludlow J, Cevidanes LH, Mol A. In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Angle Orthod 2008;78:873-9.Search in Google Scholar
Olmez H, Gorgulu S,Akin E, Bengi AO, Tekdemir I, Ors F. Measurement accuracy of a computer-assisted three-dimensional analysis and a conventional two-dimensional method. Angle Orthod 2011;81:375-82.Search in Google Scholar
