This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Bolton WA. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to analysis and treatment of malocclusions. Angle Orthod 1958; 28: 113-130.Search in Google Scholar
Bolton WA. The clinical application of a tooth size analysis. Am J Orthod 1962; 48: 504-529.Search in Google Scholar
Ho CTC and Freer TJ. The Graphical analysis of tooth width discrepancy. Aust Orthod J 1994; 13: 64-70.Search in Google Scholar
Angle EH. Treatment of Malocclusion of the Teeth. 7th edition. Philidelphia, The SS White Manufacturing Co 1907:1-22.Search in Google Scholar
Hawley CH. Determination of the Normal arch, and its application in Orthodontia. Dental Cosmos 1905; XLVH: 541-552.Search in Google Scholar
Bonwill WGA. Geometrical and Mechanical Laws of Articulation. Trans Odont Soc Penn 1884-1885: 119-133.Search in Google Scholar
Bonwill WGA. The scientific articulation of the human teeth as founded on geometrical, mathematical and mechanical laws. Items of Dental Interest 1889; XXI: 617-643.Search in Google Scholar
Neff CW. The size relationship between the maxillary and mandibular anterior segments of the dental arch. Angle Orthod 1957; 27: 138-147.Search in Google Scholar
Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod 1972; 63: 296-309.Search in Google Scholar
Tweed CH. Clinical Orthodontics. The C V Mosby Company, St. Louis 1966: 84-93.Search in Google Scholar
Hayashi T. A mathematical analysis of the curve of the dental arch. Bulletin of Tokyo Medical and Dental Univ. 1956 3: 177-218.Search in Google Scholar
Brader AC. Dental arch form related with intraoral forces: PR=C. Am J Orthod 1972; 61: 541-552.Search in Google Scholar
