[
Al Edris A, Al Jabr A, Cooley RL et al. SEM evaluation of etch patterns by three etchants on three porcelains. J Pros Dent 1990; 64: 734-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beech DR. Adhesion to teeth: principles and mechanisms. In: Smith DC, Williams DF, eds. Biocompatibility of dental materials, Vol II. Boca Raton, Florida, CRC Press, Inc. 1982:87-100.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surface. J Dent Res 1955; 34: 849-53.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Calamia JR, Vaidyanathan J, Vaidyanathan TK et al. Shear bond strengths of etched porcelain. J Dent Res 1985; 64: 296 (Abst 1096).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carty G, Tyas MJ. Shear bond strength of a mechanically retained ceramic bracket. Aust Orth J 1993; (accepted for publication).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheung WS, Pulver F, Smith DC. Custom-made veneers for permanent anterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1982; 105: 1015-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christensen GJ. Veneering of teeth, state of the art. Dent Clin N Amer 1985; 29: 373-91.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clyde JS, Gilmour A. Porcelain veneers: a preliminary review. Br Dent J 1988; 164: 9-14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eustaquio R, Garner LD, Moore BK. Comparative tensile strengths of brackets bonded to porcelain with orthodontic adhesive and porcelain repair systems. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988;94:421-5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Faunce FR, Myers DR. Laminate veneer restoration of permanent incisors. J Am Dent Assoc 1976; 93: 790-2.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ghassemi-Tary B. Direct bonding to porcelain: an in vitro study. Amer J Orthod 1979; 76: 80-3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greggs T. Historical perspectives. In: Garber DA, Goldestein RE, Feinman RA. eds. Porcelain laminate veneers, Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc. Illinois, 1988: 11-3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grossman DG. Cast glass ceramics. Dent Clin N Amer 1985; 29: 725-39.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Horn HR. A new lamination: porcelain bonded to enamel. NY State Dent J 1983a; 49: 401-3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Horn HR. Porcelain laminate veneers bonded to etched enamel. Dent Clin N Amer 1983b; 27: 671-84.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
International Organization for Standardization, Technical Committee 106 (Dentistry), Sub-Committee 1, Working Group 14. Draft Technical Report No. 11: Adhesion Test Methods.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kao EC, Boltz KC, Johnston WM. Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets to porcelain veneer laminates. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988; 94: 458-68.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kao EC, Johnston WM. Fracture incidence on debonding of orthodontic brackets from porcelain veneer laminates. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 631-7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keizer S, ten Cate JM, Arends J. Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod 1976; 69: 318-27.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lacy AM, LaLuz J, Watanabe LG et al. Effect of porcelain surface treatment on the bond to composite. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60: 288-91.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Legler LR, Retief DH, Bradley EL et al. Effects of phosphoric acid concentration and etch duration on the shear bond strength of an orthodontic bonding resin to enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989; 96: 485-92.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lopez JI. Retentive shear strengths of various bonding attachment bases. Am J Orthod 1980; 77: 669-78.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nathanson D. Dental Porcelain Technology. In: Garber DA, Goldstein RE, Feinman RA. eds. Porcelain laminate veneers. Chicago, Illinois: Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc. 1988; 24-35.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Newman SM, Dressier KB, Grenadier MR. Direct bonding of orthodontic brackets to esthetic restorative materials using a silane. Am J Orthod 1984; 86: 503-6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Odegaard J, Segner D. The use of visible light-curing composites in bonding ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990; 97: 188-93.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Phillips RW. Skinner’s science of dental materials 9th Edn., Philadelphia: W B Saunders Company 1991.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Brit J Orthod 1975;2: 717-8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rubinstein MN. Use of bonded porcelain veneer in oral reconstruction. Dental Digest 1967; 73: 17-23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rucker LM, Richter W, MacEntee M et al. Porcelain and resin veneers clinically evaluated: 2-year results. J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 121: 594-6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sheth J, Jensen M, Tolliver D. Effect of surface treatment on etched porcelain bond strength to enamel. Dent Mater 1988; 4: 328-37.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith GA, McInnes-Ledoux P, Ledoux WR et al. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain - bond strength and refinishing. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988; 94: 245-52.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ, Torres TJ et al. Shear bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1991; 4: 17-23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stokes AN, Hood JAA, Tidmarsh BG. Surface preparation for bonding to porcelain and gold. Aust Orth J 1986; 9: 321-3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wei SHY and Tang E. Laminate Veneers for the aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth. Ann Roy Aust Coll Dent Surg 1989; 10: 148-59.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wenzel R. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem 1936; 28: 988.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wood DP, Jordan RE, Way DC et al. Bonding to porcelain and gold. Am J Orthod 1986; 89: 194-205.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wright WL, Powers JM. In vitro tensile bond strength of reconditioned brackets. Am J Orthod 1985; 87: 247-52.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wunderlich RC, Yaman P. In vitro effect of topical fluorides on dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55: 385-8.
]Search in Google Scholar
