[
1. Bos LT, Tijms J. The incidence of prematurity or low birth weight for gestational age among children with dyslexia. Acta Paediatrica. 2012;101(11):e526-8. doi:http://dx.doi.org.am.enformation.ro/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02806.x.10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02806.x22882207
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Fernandes M, Silva Melo M, dos Santos AG, Santiago AKC. Prognosis of newborns in neonatal intensive care units: An integrative review. Revista De Pesquisa, Cuidado é Fundamental Online. 2019;11(3):748-755. doi:http://dx.doi.org.am.enformation.ro/10.9789/2175-5361.2019.v11i3.748-755.10.9789/2175-5361.2019.v11i3.748-755
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Ciobanu A, Khan N, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Routine ultrasound at 32 0RW1S34RfeSDcfkexd09rT2vs1RW1S34RfeSDcfkexd09r T2 36 weeks’ gestation: Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2019;53(6):761-768. doi:http://dx.doi.org.am.enformation.ro/10.1002/uog.20258.10.1002/uog.20258
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Dunbar J, Sheeder J, Lezotte D, Dabelea D, Stevens-Simon C. Age at menarche and first pregnancy among psychosocially at-risk adolescents. American Journal of Public Health. 2008;98(10):1822-4.10.2105/AJPH.2007.120444263647918703451
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Lean SC, Heazell AL, Mills TA, Boscolo-Ryan J, Peacock, L, Jones RL. PP.08 Manchester advanced maternal age study (MAMAS) - does an ageing maternal environment and altered placental function explain higher risk of poor pregnancy out come in advanced maternal age? Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 2013;98 doi:http://dx.doi.org.am.enformation.ro/10.1136/archdischild-2013-303966.289.10.1136/archdischild-2013-303966.289
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Nouri K, Ott J, Stoegbauer L, Pietrowski D, Frantal S, Walch K. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in IVF versus ICSI-conceived pregnancies at a tertiary care center - a pilot study. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2013;11:84. doi:http://dx.doi.org.am.enformation.ro/10.1186/1477-7827-11-84.10.1186/1477-7827-11-84384441624004836
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Suzuki S, Miyake H. Perinatal outcomes of elderly primiparous dichorionic twin pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization compared with those conceived spontaneously. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2010;281(1):87-90. doi:http://dx.doi.org.am.enformation.ro/10.1007/s00404-009-1083-3.10.1007/s00404-009-1083-319381666
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Dadhwal V, Sharma AK, Deka D, Chawla L, Agarwal N. Selective fetal reduction in monochorionic twins: Preliminary experience. Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association. 2019;20(2):79-83. doi:http://dx.doi.org.am.enformation.ro/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2018.2018.0052.10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2018.2018.0052655835330299263
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Yıldırım E. Spontaneous triplet pregnancy and trap sequence, case report. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2019;19.doi:http://dx.doi.org.am.enformation.ro/10.1186/s12884-019-2484-3.10.1186/s12884-019-2484-3672898531488101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Saugstad OD, Kwinta P, Wollen EJ, Bik-Multanowski M, Madetko-Talowska A, Jaga M, Pietrzyk JJ. Impact of antenatal glucocorticosteroids on whole-genome expression in preterm babies. Acta Paediatrica. 2013;102(4):349-55. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.12166.10.1111/apa.1216623347050
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Regaieg I, Amel BH, Charfi M, Regaieg C, Bouraoui A, Hmida N, Gargouri A. P635 Impact of antenatal corticosteroid therapy on the neonatal prognosis of preterm infants born before 33 weeks of amenorrhea. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2019;104 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2019-epa.966.10.1136/archdischild-2019-epa.966
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Boulet SL, Schieve LA, Nannini A, Ferre C, Devine O, Cohen B, Macaluso M. Perinatal outcomes of twin births conceived using assisted reproduction technology: A population-based study[sup]. Human Reproduction. 2008;23(8):1941-8. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den169.10.1093/humrep/den169
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Luke B, Stern JE, Hornstein MD, Kotelchuck M, Diop H, Cabral H, Declercq ER. Is the wrong question being asked in infertility research? Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2016;33(1):3-8. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0610-3.10.1007/s10815-015-0610-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Slattery MM, Morrison JJ. Preterm delivery. The Lancet. 2002;360(9344):1489-1497. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11476-0.10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11476-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Carreno CA, Chauhan SP. Caesarean section is the safest mode of delivery for extremely preterm breech singleton infants: FOR: Caesarean delivery of extremely preterm breech singletons: An international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. Bjog. 2018;125(6):665. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15037.10.1111/1471-0528.1503729700998
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Caughey AB. Elective cesarean delivery: When is it justified? Journal of Perinatology. 2006;26(1):1-2. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211421.10.1038/sj.jp.721142116355102
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Ebner F, Friedl TWP, Leinert E, Schramm A, Reister F, Lato K, DeGregorio N. Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: A single centre experience. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2016;293(4):749-755. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3902-z.10.1007/s00404-015-3902-z26437955
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Benjamin B, Ishaque U, Chrusciel J, Bonneau S, Gabriel, R, Graesslin O. Influence of the external cephalic version attempt on the cesarean section rate: Experience of a type 3 maternity hospital in France. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2021;303(2):443-454. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05765-2.10.1007/s00404-020-05765-232895742
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Kenny LC, Lavender T, McNamee R, Sinéad M O’Neill, Mills T, Khashan AS. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: Evidence from a large contemporary cohort. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056583.10.1371/journal.pone.0056583357784923437176
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Epstein FH, Parry S, Jerome FMD. Premature rupture of the fetal membranes. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1998;338(10):663-670. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/premature-rupture-fetal-membranes/docview/223949696/se-2?accountid=136549.10.1056/NEJM1998030533810069486996
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Tajik P, Ham DP, Zafarmand MH, Hof M, Morris J, Franssen M, Mol B. Using vaginal group B Streptococcus colonisation in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes to guide the decision for immediate delivery: A secondary analysis of the PPROMEXIL trials: An international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. Bjog. 2004;121(10):1263-1272. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12889.10.1111/1471-0528.1288924862166
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Suzuki Y, Horie K, Yada Y, Kono Y, Hirashima C, Usui, R, Ohkuchi A. Vaginal ureaplasma species increase chorioamnionitis in very preterm infants with preterm premature rupture of the membranes at < 28 weeks of gestation. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2018;37(12):2371-2380. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-3385-5.10.1007/s10096-018-3385-530244363
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Soliman SR, Burrows RF. Cesarean section: Analysis of the experience before and after the national consensus conference on aspects of cesarean birth: CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association. Journal. 1993;148(8):1315-20. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/cesarean-section-analysis-experience-before-after/docview/204963950/se-2?accountid=136549.
]Search in Google Scholar
