Acceso abierto

Quality of Life in Patients Rehabilitated with Implant-Supported Prostheses – A Systematic Review


Cite

1. de Liz Pocztaruk R, da Fontoura Frasca LC, Rivaldo EG, Castro Mattia PR, Vidal RA, Fernandes E, Duarte Gavião MB. Satisfaction level and masticatory capacity in edentulous patients with conventional dentures and implant-retained overdentures. Braz J Oral Sci. October-December. 2006;5:19. Search in Google Scholar

2. Rodrigues JJ, Borrego CC, Ruivo P, Sobreiro P, Catela DR, Amendoeira J, Matos R. Conceptual Framework for the Research on Quality of Life. June 2020. Sustainability. 2020;12(12):4911.10.3390/su12124911 Search in Google Scholar

3. Strassburger C, Kerschbaum T, Heydecke G. Influence of prosthetic and implant therapy on satisfaction and quality of life: a systematic literature review. Part 1: Characteristics of the studies. Int J Prosthodont. Jan-Feb 2004;17(1):83-93. Search in Google Scholar

4. Strassburger C, Kerschbaum T, Heydecke G. Influence of implant and conventional prostheses on satisfaction and quality of life: A literature review. Part 2: Qualitative analysis and evaluation of the studies. Int J Prosthodont. 2006 Jul-Aug;19(4):339-48. Search in Google Scholar

5. Emami E, Heydecke G, Rompré PH, Grandmont P, Feine JS. Impact of implant support for mandibular dentures on satisfaction, oral and general health-related quality of life: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jun;20(6):533-44.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01693.x19515032 Search in Google Scholar

6. Egido Moreno S, Ayuso Montero R, Schemel Suárez M, Roca-Umbert JV, Izquierdo Gómez K, López J. Evaluation of the quality of life and satisfaction in patients using complete dentures versus mandibular overdentures. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research. 2020;7(10).10.1002/cre2.347801977033205918 Search in Google Scholar

7. Neshandar Asli H, Hemmati YB, Ghaffari ME, Falahchai M. Satisfaction of patients with mandibular implant supported overdentures using a generalized estimating equation model: A prospective study. Journal of Osseointegration. June 2021;13(2). Search in Google Scholar

8. Jacquot J. Trust in the Dentist-Patient Relationship: A Review. UCLA. Journal of Young Investigators. June 1, 2005. Search in Google Scholar

9. Ustrell-Torrent JM, Buxarrais-Estrada MR, Ustrell-Torrent P. Ethical relationship in the dentist-patient interaction. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Jan;13(1): e61–e66.10.4317/jced.57597778121633425233 Search in Google Scholar

10. Oncescu Moraru AM, Preoteasa CT, Wagner A, Murariu-Măgureanu C, Meghea D, Preoteasa E. Instruments for measuring quality of life, in relation to masticatory performance, elderly patients with removable dentures. Romanian Journal of Stomatology. 2019;65(1):5-910.37897/RJS.2019.1.1 Search in Google Scholar

11. Bahat O, Sullivan RM. Parameters for successful implant integration revisited part I: immediate loading considered in light of the original prerequisites for osseointegration. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 May;12 Suppl 1:e2-12.10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00279.x20455902 Search in Google Scholar

12. Gross MD. Occlusion in implant dentistry. A review of the literature of prosthetic determinants and current concepts. Australian Dental JournaL; 2008.10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00043.x18498587 Search in Google Scholar

13. Melas F, Marcenes W, Wright P S. Oral health impact on daily performance in patients with implant-stabilized overdentures and patients with conventional complete dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. Sep-Oct 2001;16(5):700-12. Search in Google Scholar

14. Awad MA, Lund JP, Shapiro SH, Locker D, Klemetti E, Chehade A, Savard A, Feine JS. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population. Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Jul-Aug; 16(4):390-6. Search in Google Scholar

15. Awad MA, Lund JP, Dufresne E, Feine JS. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment. Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Mar-Apr;16(2):117-22. Search in Google Scholar

16. Abu Hantash R.O., Al-Omiri M.K., Al-Wahadni A.M. Psychological impact on implant patients’ oral health-related quality of life. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(2):116-123. Search in Google Scholar

17. Torres BL, Costa FO, Modena CM, Cota LO, Côrtes MI, Seraidarian PI. Association between personality traits and quality of life in patients treated with conventional mandibular dentures or implant-supported overdentures. J Oral Rehabil. 2011 Jun; 38(6):454-61.10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02165.x21039749 Search in Google Scholar

18. Al-Omiri MK, Hammad OA, Lynch E, Lamey PJ, Clifford TJ. Impacts of implant treatment on daily living. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4):877-86. Search in Google Scholar

19. Al-Omiri MK, Abu Hantash RO, Abu Yunis M, Lynch E. Relationship between personality and impacts of implant treatment on daily living. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 May;14 Suppl 1:e2-10.10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00331.x21414136 Search in Google Scholar

20. Sargozaie N, Moeintaghavi A, Shojaie H. Comparing the Quality of Life of Patients Requesting Dental Implants Before and After Implant. Open Dentistry Journal. 2017 Aug 21;11:485-49.10.2174/1874210601711010485564601929114333 Search in Google Scholar

21. Cardoso RG, Melo LA, Barbosa GA, Calderon PD, Germano AR, Mestriner W Junior, Carreiro AD. Impact of mandibular conventional denture and overdenture on quality of life and masticatory efficiency. Braz Oral Res. 2016 Oct 10;30(1):e102.10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.010227737356 Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2285-7079
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
4 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Medicine, Assistive Professions, Nursing, Basic Medical Science, other, Clinical Medicine