Cite

[1] Manning, C. D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J. R., Bethard, S. and McClosky, D. (2014), The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit, Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, (ACL 2014), pp. 55-60.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Socher, R., Perelygin, A., Wu, J., Chuang, J., Manning, C., Ng, A. and Potts, C. (2013), Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality Over a Sentiment Treebank, Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2013), vol. 1631, pp. 1631-1642.Search in Google Scholar

[3] High, R. (2012), The Era of Cognitive Systems: An Inside Look at IBM Watson and How it Works, Redbooks and IBM Corporation, vol. 1.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Ferrucci, D. (2012), Introduction to “This is Watson”, IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 56, pp. 1-15.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Kushwanth, R., Sachin, A., Shambhavi, B. and Shobha, G. (2014), Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Data, International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering and Technology (IJARCET 2014), vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 4337-4342.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Pak, A. and Paroubek, P. (2010), Twitter as a Corpus for Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining, Proceedings of the 7th Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10), vol. 10, pp. 1320-1326.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Dalmia, A., Gupta, M. and Varma, V. (2015), Twitter Sentiment Analysis. The good, the bad and the neutral!, Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015), pp. 520-526.10.18653/v1/S15-2087Search in Google Scholar

[8] Agarwal, A., Xie, B., Vovsha, I., Rambow, O. and Passonneau, R. (2011), Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Data, Proceedings of the Workshop on Languages in Social Media (LSM’11), pp. 30-38.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kouloumpis, E., Wilson, T. and Moore, J. (2011), Twitter Sentiment Analysis: The Good, the Bad and the Omg!, Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 538-541.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Younggue, B. and Hongchul, L. (2012), Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Audiences: Measuring the positive or negative in influence of popular twitterers, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 2521-2535.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Colianni, S., Rosales, S. C. and Signorotti, M. (2015), Algorithmic Trading of Cryptocurrency Based on Twitter Sentiment Analysis, CS229 Project, pp. 1-5.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Kim, Y. B., Kim, J. G., Kim, W., Im, J. H., Kim, T. H., Kang, S. J. and Kim, C. H. (2016), Predicting Fluctuations in Cryptocurrency Transactions Based on User Comments and Replies, PLoS One, 11(8), e0161197.10.1371/journal.pone.0161197498863927533113Search in Google Scholar

[13] Stanford CoreNLP (2018) [Online]. Available: https://stanfordnlp.github.io/CoreNLP/Search in Google Scholar

[14] Stanford Sentiment Analysis (2018) [Online]. Available: https://nlp.stanford.edu/sentiment/Search in Google Scholar

[15] Natural Language Understanding (2018) [Online]. Available: https://www.ibm.com/watson/developercloud/natural-language-understanding/api/v1/Search in Google Scholar

[16] Search Tweets (2018) [Online]. Available: https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/tweets/searchSearch in Google Scholar

[17] Reddit Api (2018) [Online]. Available: https://www.reddit.com/dev/apiSearch in Google Scholar

[18] CoinMarketCap (2018) [Online]. Available: https://coinmarketcap.comSearch in Google Scholar

[19] BitInfoCharts (2018) [Online]. Available: https://bitinfocharts.comSearch in Google Scholar