A study on the measurement and standardized assessment model of student learning outcomes in vocational institutions

[1]Gan, W., Sun, Y., & Sun, Y. (2022). Knowledge interaction enhanced sequential modeling for interpretable learner knowledge diagnosis in intelligent tutoring systems. Neurocomputing, 488, 36-53.Search in Google Scholar

[2]Lamb, R. L., Annetta, L., Firestone, J., et al. (2018). A meta-analysis with examination of moderators of student cognition, affect, and learning outcomes while using serious educational games, serious games, and simulations. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 158-167.Search in Google Scholar

[3]Martinez, Abad, F., Chaparro Caso López, A. A. (2017). Data-mining techniques in detecting factors linked to academic achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(1), 39-55.Search in Google Scholar

[4]Hartikainen, S., Rintala, H., Pylväs, L., et al. (2019). The concept of active learning and the measurement of learning outcomes: A review of research in engineering higher education. Education Sciences, 9(4), 276.Search in Google Scholar

[5]Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., Sharma, D. (2018). Online learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome—A review of literature. International Journal of Information Management, 43: 1-14.Search in Google Scholar

[6]Moore, V. D. G., Cortes, K., Dries, D., Kanipes, M., Kennelly, P., & Loertscher, J., et al. (2021). An inclusive workshop centered on assessment of biochemistry and molecular biology student learning outcomes. The FASEB Journal, 35(S1), -Search in Google Scholar

[7]Chen, S. M., Li, T. K. (2019). Evaluating students’ learning achievement based on fuzzy rules with fuzzy reasoning capability. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 4368-4381.Search in Google Scholar

[8]Chrysafiadi, K., Virvou, M. (2012). Evaluating the integration of fuzzy logic into the student model of a web-based learning environment. Expert systems with applications, 39(18), 13127-13134.Search in Google Scholar

[9]Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., et al. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87-122.Search in Google Scholar

[10]Pedro, M. O. Z. S., Baker, R. S. J. D., Bowers, A. J., et al. (2011). Predicting college enrollment from student interaction with an intelligent tutoring system in middle school.Langmuir the Acs Journal of Surfaces & Colloids, 27 (11), 6897-6904.Search in Google Scholar

[11]Müller, C., Mildenberger, T. (2021). Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with anonline learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education. Educational Research Review, 34, 100394.Search in Google Scholar

[12]Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74-98.Search in Google Scholar

[13]Gokmen, G., Akinci, T. Ç., Tektaş, M., et al. (2017). Evaluation of student performance in laboratory applications using fuzzy logic. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 902-909.Search in Google Scholar

[14]Wang, W., Ma, H., Zhao, Y., Li, Z., & He, X. (2022). Tracking knowledge proficiency of students with calibrated q-matrix. Expert Systems with Applications, 192, 116454-.Search in Google Scholar

[15]Bai, S. M., Chen, S. M. (2018). Evaluating students’ learning achievement using fuzzy membership functions and fuzzy rules. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 399-410.Search in Google Scholar

[16]Svensäter, G., Rohlin, M. (2023). Assessment model blending formative and summative assessments using the SOLO taxonomy. European Journal of Dental Education, 27(1), 149-157.Search in Google Scholar

[17]Junker, B. W., Sijtsma, K. (2018). Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25(3), 258-272.Search in Google Scholar