Variable | Measurement indicator |
---|---|
Network centrality | The connected object has a high degree of information exchange through the company. |
Network scale | The number of companies in the network. |
Network strength | The company has frequent contact with connected objects. |
Social capital | There are abundant subjects in the IUR cooperation network. |
Innovation performance | The company spends more on technology development than its competitors. |
Independent variable | Innovation performance | ||
---|---|---|---|
t-value | Sig. | ||
Network scale | 0.055 | 1.142 | 0.306 |
Network centrality | 0.139 | 4.736 | 0.000 |
Network strength | 0.418 | 7.203 | 0.000 |
F | 115.82 |
||
R2 | 0.383 | ||
Adjusted R-Squared | 0.381 |
Variable | Network scale | Network centrality | Network strength | Communality |
---|---|---|---|---|
The extent to which connected objects exchange information through the company | 0.714 | 0.612 | ||
The degree of using relationship Bridge | 0.809 | 0.795 | ||
Robustness of the relationship with the connected object | 0.792 | 0.529 | ||
Number of companies in the network | 0.809 | 0.770 | ||
Number of research institutions in the network | 0.716 | 0.729 | ||
Number of universities in the network | 0.854 | 0.763 | ||
Number of governments in the network | 0.796 | 0.718 | ||
Duration of contact | 0.824 | 0.605 | ||
Emotional intensity | 0.817 | 0.741 | ||
KMO test value = 0.894 =0.870; Bartlett's sphericity test X2=1158.237; df = 15; sig = 0.000; Cumulative variance contribution rate =68.714% |
Network scale | Network centrality | Network strength | Social capital | Innovation performance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Network scale | 1 | ||||
Network centrality | 0.793 |
1 | |||
Network strength | 0.814 |
0.761 |
1 | ||
Social capital | 0.803 |
0.774 |
0.907 |
1 | |
Innovation performance | 0.911 |
0.821 |
0.845 |
0.822 |
1 |
Independent variable | Innovation performance | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
t-value | Sig. | |||
Network centrality | 0.119 | 3.237 |
0.023 | 4.736>3.237, Significant, partially mediating effect |
Network strength | 0.162 | 4.148 |
0.001 | 7.203>4.148, Significant, partially mediating effect |
Social capital | 0.471 | 9.213 |
0.000 | |
F | 57.131 |
|||
R2 | 0.533 | |||
Adjusted R-Squared | 0.529 |
Measurement indicator | Social capital factor | Innovation performance factor | Communality | |
---|---|---|---|---|
There are abundant subjects in the IUR cooperation network | 0.813 | 0.729 | ||
The company and the connected object provide additional help to each other | 0.874 | 0.681 | ||
The company has the same value orientation as the connected object | 0.702 | 0.653 | ||
KMO test value = 0.894; Bartlett's sphericity test X2 = 535.122; df = 13; sig = 0.000; Cumulative variance contribution rate = 66.917% | ||||
Total technology development funds | 0.716 | 0.704 | ||
Number of patents granted | 0.861 | 0.693 | ||
Speed of new product development | 0.836 | 0.668 | ||
Number of technical innovation personnel | 0.782 | 0.773 | ||
KMO test value = 0.894=0.861; Bartlett's sphericity test X2=481.207; df = 10; sig = 0.000; Cumulative variance contribution rate =74.331% |
Independent variable | Innovation performance | ||
---|---|---|---|
t-value | Sig. | ||
Social capital | 0.517 | 15.282 | 0.000 |
F | 136.06 |
||
R2 | 0.363 | ||
Adjusted R-Squared | 0.361 |
Variable | KMO value | Significance | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Characteristics of IUR cooperation network | Network centrality | 0.859 | 0.901 | 0.753 | 0.914 | 0.000 |
Network scale | 0.860 | 0.648 | ||||
Network strength | 0.798 | 0.792 | ||||
Social capital | 0.877 | 0.894 | 0.000 | |||
Innovation performance | 0.803 | 0.861 | 0.000 |
Independent variable | Social capital | ||
---|---|---|---|
t-value | Sig. | ||
Network scale | 0.034 | 1.305 | 0.498 |
Network centrality | 0.397 | 3.417 | 0.000 |
Network strength | 0.524 | 5.007 | 0.000 |
F | 76.62 |
||
R2 | 0.219 | ||
Adjusted R-Squared | 0.214 |