Acceso abierto

Practice and Effectiveness Evaluation of Community Policing Informatization in Social Management

  
25 sept 2025

Cite
Descargar portada

Figure 1.

Functional structure of community policing platform
Functional structure of community policing platform

Figure 2.

Mining process of traditional association rule algorithm
Mining process of traditional association rule algorithm

Figure 3.

Perceptions of community residents on community policing work
Perceptions of community residents on community policing work

Figure 4.

Theft decision tree
Theft decision tree

Figure 5.

Satisfaction of community residents
Satisfaction of community residents

Theft association rules(part)

Support Probability Rule
1.000 1.000 Location=Residential area, Native place=Hebei Province, Sex=Male⇒Illegal act=Steal
1.000 1.000 Location=Commercial district, Native place=Hebei Province, Sex=Female⇒Illegal act=Pickpocket
1.000 1.000 Time of crime=Night, Sex=Male, Crime point=Solo crime⇒Lost items=Cash and luxury goods
1.000 1.000 Time of crime=Night, Native place=Hebei Province, Crime point=Gang crime, Tools of crime = knives⇒Illegal act=Intentional wounding
1.000 1.000 Native place=Hebei Province, Sex=Male, Age =“30-40”, Crime point=Solo crime⇒Illegal act=Steal
1.000 1.000 Native place=Jiangxi Province, Sex=Male, Age =“40-50”, Lost items=Electronic product⇒Illegal act=Steal
1.000 1.000 Time of crime=Night, Native place=Jiangxi Province, Tools of crime = knives⇒Illegal act=Intentional wounding
1.000 1.000 Native place=Jiangxi Province, Location=Residential area, Age =“30-40”, Crime point=Solo crime⇒Illegal act=Steal
1.000 1.000 Native place=Jiangxi Province, Age =“40-50”, Sex=Female⇒Illegal act=Pickpocket
... ... ...

Detailed evaluation of community residents

Very good Normal Poor
Evaluation aspect Number of people Proportion Number of people Proportion Number of people Proportion
Community security situation 348 72.96% 106 22.22% 23 4.82%
Law enforcement status 372 77.99% 93 19.50% 12 2.51%
Efficiency of service 327 68.55% 125 26.21% 25 5.24%
Attitude of service 477 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
Transparency of information 452 94.76% 25 5.24% 0 0.00%

Status of community residents’ participation in community policing

Question Option Number of people Proportion
Q6 Wechat and other online channels 109 25.23%
Face-to-face and other offline channels 62 14.35%
Both online and offline 39 9.03%
Have not participated 222 51.39%
Q7 Fire promotion and training 264 61.11%
Community patrol 39 9.03%
Civil dispute mediation 95 21.99%
Other 34 7.87%
Q8 Insufficient police force 88 20.37%
The trajectory of people, vehicles and objects cannot be fully controlled 35 8.10%
Slow information collection 233 53.94%
Prediction and elimination of fire and other hidden dangers 54 12.50%
Other 22 5.09%